Paper · 1970 · Nepal Journal of Science and Technology

Plant Growth Promotional Effect of Azotobacter chroococcum, Piriformospora indica and Vermicompost on Rice Plant

Kamil Prajapati; K. D. Yami; A. Singh

3
claims
7
verbatim quotes
47
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

The activities of rhizospheric organisms have been well recognized in non-leguminous plants such as tropical grasses, rice and maize. Such activities include nitrogen fixation, phosphate solubilization and mineralization that are beneficial for the overall growth and development of the plant. An experiment was carried out to study the growth promotion of rice (Oryza sativa L.) due to dual inoculation of Azotobacter chroococcum and Piriformospora indica along with vermicompost. The effects on shoot length, root length, fresh shoot and root weight, dry shoot and root weight, and panicle number on 45th day and 90th day were investigated. In both the stages these parameters of all the treated plants were significantly (P<0.05) greater than the uninoculated control. Dual inoculated plants in presence of vermicompost gave better positive effects on both 45th day and 90th day, in comparison to single inoculation of A. chroococcum, P. indica and vermicompost. However, A. chroococcum treated plants showed significant decrease in dry root weight as compared to control plants on 90th day observation. This suggested that dual inoculation of A. chroococcum and P. indica had beneficiary response on growth of rice plant. Key words: rice; Azotobacter chroococcum; Piriformospora indica; vermicompost; mycorrhizae nitrogen fixation DOI: 10.3126/njst.v9i0.3170 Nepal Journal of Science and Technology 9 (2008) 85-90

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Treated rice plants had significantly greater shoot and root length, fresh and dry weights, and panicle numbers than uninoculated controls at both stages.

Treatment
all the treated plantse0
Outcome
shoot length, root length, fresh shoot and root weighte0
Direction
greatere0
Qualifier
45th day and 90th daye0
Comparator
uninoculated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effects on shoot length, root length, fresh shoot and root weight, dry shoot and root weight, and panicle number on 45th day and 90th day were investigated. In both the stages these parameters of all the treated plants were significantly (P<0.05) greater than the uninoculated control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 482–771 · show in text ↑
e1

“rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 357–379 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dual inoculation with vermicompost had better growth effects than single inoculations or vermicompost at days 45 and 90.

Treatment
Dual inoculated plants in presence of vermicomposte0
Outcome
better positive effectse0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
single inoculation of A. chroococcum, P. indica and vermicomposte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dual inoculated plants in presence of vermicompost gave better positive effects on both 45th day and 90th day, in comparison to single inoculation of A. chroococcum, P. indica and vermicompost.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 772–965 · show in text ↑
e1

“rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 357–379 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Azotobacter treatment significantly reduced dry root weight versus controls on day 90.

Treatment
A. chroococcum treated plantse0
Interactor
A. chroococcumAzotobacter chroococcume0symbiont
Outcome
dry root weighte0
Direction
decreasee0
Comparator
control plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A. chroococcum treated plants showed significant decrease in dry root weight as compared to control plants on 90th day observation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 975–1106 · show in text ↑
e1

“rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 357–379 · show in text ↑
e2

“Azotobacter chroococcum and Piriformospora indica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 407–456 · show in text ↑

Azotobacter chroococcum · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.