Paper · 1967 · Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry

Factors effecting the establishment of spring-sown Phalaris tuberosa

RJ Hutchings

9
claims
26
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

When Phalaris tuberosa L. is sown in spring on short fallow, regenerating plants from the previous sward and invading annuals may compete with and restrict the phalaris. On light textured soils of low fertility at Ginninderra, A.C.T., fallows were prepared by either mouldboard or chisel ploughing with or without rolling after sowing. The effect on yields and density of sown phalaris, of clover oversown in the following autumn, and of competing species was measured. After twelve months the treatments had the following effects : On the unrolled seedbeds yield of Phalaris was 140 per cent higher after mouldboard ploughing than after chisel ploughing ; the yield of competing species was 16 per cent after mouldboard ploughing, and 59 per cent after chisel ploughing. Total yield was higher (+ 18 per cent) on the chisel ploughed seedbed. Rolling decreased yield of Phalaris by 10 per cent after mouldboard ploughing, but increased yield by 76 per cent after chisel ploughing. After three years the yields of Phalaris were still higher and those of competing species lower on the mouldboard ploughed seedbeds. Total yields were the same on both types of seedbed.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After one year, mouldboard ploughing raised unrolled Phalaris yield 140 per cent relative to chisel ploughing.

Taxon
Phalaris tuberosa L.Phalaris aquaticae1
Treatment
mouldboard ploughinge0
Outcome
yield of Phalarise0
Direction
highere0
Value
140 per cente0
Comparator
chisel ploughinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phalaris aquatica
Phalaris aquatica · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“On the unrolled seedbeds yield of Phalaris was 140 per cent higher after mouldboard ploughing than after chisel ploughing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 533–654 · show in text ↑
e1

“Phalaris tuberosa L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 5–25 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Competing-species yield was 16 per cent after mouldboard ploughing.

Taxon
Phalaris tuberosa L.Phalaris aquaticae1
Treatment
mouldboard ploughinge0
Outcome
yield of competing speciese0
Value
16 per cente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phalaris aquatica
Phalaris aquatica · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the yield of competing species was 16 per cent after mouldboard ploughing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 657–730 · show in text ↑
e1

“Phalaris tuberosa L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 5–25 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Competing-species yield was 59 per cent after chisel ploughing.

Taxon
Phalaris tuberosa L.Phalaris aquaticae2
Treatment
chisel ploughinge0
Outcome
yield of competing speciese1
Value
59 per cente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phalaris aquatica
Phalaris aquatica · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“59 per cent after chisel ploughing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 736–770 · show in text ↑
e1

“the yield of competing species was 16 per cent after mouldboard ploughing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 657–730 · show in text ↑
e2

“Phalaris tuberosa L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 5–25 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total yield was 18 per cent higher on chisel-ploughed seedbeds.

Taxon
Phalaris tuberosa L.Phalaris aquaticae2
Treatment
chisel ploughed seedbede0
Outcome
Total yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
18 per cente0
Comparator
mouldboarde1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phalaris aquatica
Phalaris aquatica · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Total yield was higher (+ 18 per cent) on the chisel ploughed seedbed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 772–842 · show in text ↑
e1

“either mouldboard or chisel ploughing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 260–297 · show in text ↑
e2

“Phalaris tuberosa L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 5–25 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rolling lowered Phalaris yield by 10 per cent following mouldboard ploughing.

Taxon
Phalaris tuberosa L.Phalaris aquaticae2
Treatment
Rollinge0
Outcome
yield of Phalarise0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
10 per cente0
Qualifier
after mouldboard ploughinge0
Comparator
without rollinge1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phalaris aquatica
Phalaris aquatica · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rolling decreased yield of Phalaris by 10 per cent after mouldboard ploughing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 843–920 · show in text ↑
e1

“with or without rolling after sowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 298–334 · show in text ↑
e2

“Phalaris tuberosa L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 5–25 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rolling raised Phalaris yield by 76 per cent following chisel ploughing.

Taxon
Phalaris tuberosa L.Phalaris aquaticae3
Treatment
Rollinge1
Outcome
yield of Phalarise1
Direction
increasede0
Value
76 per cente0
Qualifier
after chisel ploughinge0
Comparator
without rollinge2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phalaris aquatica
Phalaris aquatica · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased yield by 76 per cent after chisel ploughing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 926–979 · show in text ↑
e1

“Rolling decreased yield of Phalaris”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 843–878 · show in text ↑
e2

“with or without rolling after sowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 298–334 · show in text ↑
e3

“Phalaris tuberosa L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 5–25 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After three years, Phalaris yield remained higher on mouldboard-ploughed seedbeds.

Taxon
Phalaris tuberosa L.Phalaris aquaticae2
Treatment
mouldboard ploughed seedbedse0
Outcome
yields of Phalarise0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
After three yearse0
Comparator
chisel ploughinge1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phalaris aquatica
Phalaris aquatica · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“After three years the yields of Phalaris were still higher and those of competing species lower on the mouldboard ploughed seedbeds.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 981–1113 · show in text ↑
e1

“either mouldboard or chisel ploughing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 260–297 · show in text ↑
e2

“Phalaris tuberosa L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 5–25 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After three years, competing-species yield was lower on mouldboard-ploughed seedbeds.

Taxon
Phalaris tuberosa L.Phalaris aquaticae2
Treatment
mouldboard ploughed seedbedse0
Outcome
those of competing speciese0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
chisel ploughinge1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phalaris aquatica
Phalaris aquatica · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“After three years the yields of Phalaris were still higher and those of competing species lower on the mouldboard ploughed seedbeds.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 981–1113 · show in text ↑
e1

“either mouldboard or chisel ploughing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 260–297 · show in text ↑
e2

“Phalaris tuberosa L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 5–25 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After three years, total yields were the same under both seedbed types.

Taxon
Phalaris tuberosa L.Phalaris aquaticae2
Treatment
mouldboarde1
Outcome
Total yieldse0
Direction
the samee0
Comparator
chisel ploughinge1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phalaris aquatica
Phalaris aquatica · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Total yields were the same on both types of seedbed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1114–1166 · show in text ↑
e1

“either mouldboard or chisel ploughing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 260–297 · show in text ↑
e2

“Phalaris tuberosa L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 5–25 · show in text ↑

tillage · yield · Phalaris aquatica (canary grass)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.