Paper · 2014 · Tropical Plant Pathology

Supression of seed borne Cladosporium herbarum on common bean seed by Trichoderma harzianum and promotion of seedling development

G. R. Guimarães; Faber S. Pereira; Fabio S. Matos; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
10
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

Trichoderma harzianum isolates have been broadly used for biocontrol of plant diseases caused by fungi. Cladosporium herbarum is a common saprophyte and seed borne fungus, which is easy to manipulate under controlled conditions. It was chosen as a model to test the effectivity of seed treatments with T. harzianum. Common bean seeds (cv. Pérola) contaminated with C. herbarum were treated with conidial suspension (CS) and autoclaved filtrate (AF) of five isolates of T. harzianum and subsequently submitted to health and germination tests. The proportion of normal seedlings formed, the length of roots, hypocotyls and leaves, and total plantlet length, total plantlet biomass, root mass ratio (RMR), stem mass ratio (SMR), leaf mass ratio (LMR), aerial part/root system ratio (AP/RS) and leaf area were also evaluated. Isolates CEN289 and CEN290 (CS and AF) provided 66 to 77% of supression of C. herbarum on seeds and a higher number of normal seedlings as compared with control. It also yielded a higher total biomass of plantlets. Moreover treatment with isolates CEN289 and CEN290 increased root and stem length in the experiments with CS. Such results indicate the potential of T. harzianum for seed treatment and suggest that it should be further tested as control for seed borne fungal diseases and as a plant growth promoter. The better performance found for CEN289 and CEN290 confirms the variability in terms of biocontrol activity among strains of T. harzianum.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CEN289 suppressed seedborne C. herbarum by 66 to 77%.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Material
CEN289e0
Treatment
CS and AFe0
Interactor
C. herbarumCladosporium herbarume0pathogen
Outcome
supression of C. herbarum on seedse0
Direction
supressione0
Value
66 to 77%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Isolates CEN289 and CEN290 (CS and AF) provided 66 to 77% of supression of C. herbarum on seeds and a higher number of normal seedlings as compared with control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 822–983 · show in text ↑
t0

“common bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CEN290 suppressed seedborne C. herbarum by 66 to 77%.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Material
CEN290e0
Treatment
CS and AFe0
Interactor
C. herbarumCladosporium herbarume0pathogen
Outcome
supression of C. herbarum on seedse0
Direction
supressione0
Value
66 to 77%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Isolates CEN289 and CEN290 (CS and AF) provided 66 to 77% of supression of C. herbarum on seeds and a higher number of normal seedlings as compared with control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 822–983 · show in text ↑
t0

“common bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CEN289 and CEN290 treatments produced more normal seedlings than control.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
Isolates CEN289 and CEN290 (CS and AF)e0
Outcome
number of normal seedlingse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Isolates CEN289 and CEN290 (CS and AF) provided 66 to 77% of supression of C. herbarum on seeds and a higher number of normal seedlings as compared with control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 822–983 · show in text ↑
t0

“common bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The treatments increased plantlet total biomass.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
Trichoderma harzianumt0
Outcome
total biomass of plantletse0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It also yielded a higher total biomass of plantlets.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 984–1036 · show in text ↑
t0

“Supression of seed borne Cladosporium herbarum on common bean seed by Trichoderma harzianum and promotion of seedling development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–129 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CEN289 and CEN290 conidial suspension treatments increased root and stem length.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
isolates CEN289 and CEN290e0
Outcome
root and stem lengthe0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
experiments with CSe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Moreover treatment with isolates CEN289 and CEN290 increased root and stem length in the experiments with CS.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1037–1146 · show in text ↑
t0

“common bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–61 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biocontrol activity varied among T. harzianum strains.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Outcome
variability in terms of biocontrol activity among strains of T. harzianume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The better performance found for CEN289 and CEN290 confirms the variability in terms of biocontrol activity among strains of T. harzianum.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1337–1475 · show in text ↑
t0

“common bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–61 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend further testing T. harzianum seed treatments for disease control and growth promotion.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Outcome
control for seed borne fungal diseases and as a plant growth promotere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it should be further tested as control for seed borne fungal diseases and as a plant growth promoter.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1235–1336 · show in text ↑
t0

“common bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–61 · show in text ↑

Trichoderma harzianum · growth · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 17 positive, 1 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.