Paper · 2008 · Phytopathology

Trichoderma harzianum: A Biocontrol Agent Effective Against Sclerotium rolfsii and Rhizoctonia solani

Y. Elad; I. Chet; J. Katan

12
claims
12
verbatim quotes
340
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

An isolate of Trichoderma harzianum capable of lysing mycelia of Sclerotium rolfsii and Rhizoctonia solani was isolated from a soil naturally infested with those pathogens. In culture, T. harzianum grew better than S. rolfsii and invaded its mycelium under growth conditions adverse to the pathogen; eg, high pentachloronitrobenzene concentrations, high pH levels, or low temperatures. Under greenhouse conditions, incorporation of the wheat-bran inoculum preparation of T. harzianum in pathogen-infested soil significantly reduced bean diseases caused by S. rolfsii, R. solani, or both, but its biocontrol capacity was inversely correlated with temperature. The wheat bran preparation of T. harzianum increased growth of bean plants in a noninfested soil and it controlled S. rolfsii more efficiently than a conidial suspension of the same antagonist. An uninoculated wheat bran preparation increased disease incidence. In naturally infested soils, wheat bran preparations of T. harzianum inoculum significantly decreased diseases caused by S. rolfsii or R. solani in three field experiments with beans, cotton, or tomatoes, and they significantly increased the yield of beans.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trichoderma harzianum lysed mycelia of Sclerotium rolfsii and Rhizoctonia solani.

Interactor
Sclerotium rolfsiiAgroathelia rolfsiie0pathogen
Second interactor
Trichoderma harzianumTrichoderma harzianume0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
lysing myceliae0

Not reportedTaxon

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agroathelia rolfsii
Agroathelia rolfsii · InteractorEdward L. Barnard - Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma harzianum
Trichoderma harzianum · Second interactorUS Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Systematic Botany and Mycology Laboratory, [1] · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“An isolate of Trichoderma harzianum capable of lysing mycelia of Sclerotium rolfsii and Rhizoctonia solani was isolated from a soil naturally infested with those pathogens.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–172 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In culture, T. harzianum grew better than S. rolfsii under conditions adverse to the pathogen.

Interactor
S. rolfsiiAgroathelia rolfsiie0pathogen
Second interactor
T. harzianumTrichoderma harzianume0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
grew bettere0

Not reportedTaxon

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agroathelia rolfsii
Agroathelia rolfsii · InteractorEdward L. Barnard - Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma harzianum
Trichoderma harzianum · Second interactorUS Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Systematic Botany and Mycology Laboratory, [1] · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In culture, T. harzianum grew better than S. rolfsii and invaded its mycelium under growth conditions adverse to the pathogen; eg, high pentachloronitrobenzene concentrations, high pH levels, or low temperatures.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 173–385 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T. harzianum invaded S. rolfsii mycelium under adverse pathogen growth conditions.

Interactor
S. rolfsiiAgroathelia rolfsiie0pathogen
Second interactor
T. harzianumTrichoderma harzianume0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
invaded its myceliume0

Not reportedTaxon

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agroathelia rolfsii
Agroathelia rolfsii · InteractorEdward L. Barnard - Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma harzianum
Trichoderma harzianum · Second interactorUS Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Systematic Botany and Mycology Laboratory, [1] · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In culture, T. harzianum grew better than S. rolfsii and invaded its mycelium under growth conditions adverse to the pathogen; eg, high pentachloronitrobenzene concentrations, high pH levels, or low temperatures.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 173–385 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T. harzianum wheat-bran inoculum significantly reduced S. rolfsii disease of greenhouse beans.

Taxon
beane0
Treatment
wheat-bran inoculum preparation of T. harzianume0
Interactor
S. rolfsiiAgroathelia rolfsiie0pathogen
Second interactor
T. harzianumTrichoderma harzianume0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
bean diseases caused by S. rolfsiie0
Direction
reducede0
Setting
greenhousee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agroathelia rolfsii
Agroathelia rolfsii · InteractorEdward L. Barnard - Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma harzianum
Trichoderma harzianum · Second interactorUS Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Systematic Botany and Mycology Laboratory, [1] · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under greenhouse conditions, incorporation of the wheat-bran inoculum preparation of T. harzianum in pathogen-infested soil significantly reduced bean diseases caused by S. rolfsii, R. solani, or both”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 386–586 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T. harzianum wheat-bran inoculum significantly reduced R. solani disease of greenhouse beans.

Taxon
beane0
Treatment
wheat-bran inoculum preparation of T. harzianume0
Interactor
R. solaniRhizoctonia solanie0pathogen
Second interactor
T. harzianumTrichoderma harzianume0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
bean diseasese0
Direction
reducede0
Setting
greenhousee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Trichoderma harzianum
Trichoderma harzianum · Second interactorUS Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Systematic Botany and Mycology Laboratory, [1] · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under greenhouse conditions, incorporation of the wheat-bran inoculum preparation of T. harzianum in pathogen-infested soil significantly reduced bean diseases caused by S. rolfsii, R. solani, or both”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 386–586 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T. harzianum biocontrol capacity was inversely correlated with temperature.

Outcome
biocontrol capacitye0
Direction
inversely correlatede0

Not reportedTaxonInteractorSetting

Verbatim

e0

“its biocontrol capacity was inversely correlated with temperature.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 592–658 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T. harzianum wheat-bran preparation increased bean growth in noninfested soil.

Taxon
beane0
Treatment
wheat bran preparation of T. harzianume0
Interactor
T. harzianumTrichoderma harzianume0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trichoderma harzianum
Trichoderma harzianum · InteractorUS Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Systematic Botany and Mycology Laboratory, [1] · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The wheat bran preparation of T. harzianum increased growth of bean plants in a noninfested soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 659–755 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat-bran T. harzianum controlled S. rolfsii more efficiently than a conidial suspension.

Interactor
S. rolfsiiAgroathelia rolfsiie0pathogen
Outcome
controlled S. rolfsiie0
Direction
more efficientlye0
Comparator
a conidial suspensione0

Not reportedTaxonTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agroathelia rolfsii
Agroathelia rolfsii · InteractorEdward L. Barnard - Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it controlled S. rolfsii more efficiently than a conidial suspension of the same antagonist.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 760–852 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Uninoculated wheat bran increased disease incidence.

Treatment
uninoculated wheat bran preparatione0
Outcome
disease incidencee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“An uninoculated wheat bran preparation increased disease incidence.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 853–920 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T. harzianum wheat-bran inoculum significantly decreased S. rolfsii diseases in naturally infested field soils.

Taxon
beans, cotton, or tomatoese0
Treatment
wheat bran preparations of T. harzianum inoculume0
Interactor
S. rolfsiiAgroathelia rolfsiie0pathogen
Second interactor
T. harzianumTrichoderma harzianume0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
diseases caused by S. rolfsiie0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agroathelia rolfsii
Agroathelia rolfsii · InteractorEdward L. Barnard - Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma harzianum
Trichoderma harzianum · Second interactorUS Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Systematic Botany and Mycology Laboratory, [1] · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In naturally infested soils, wheat bran preparations of T. harzianum inoculum significantly decreased diseases caused by S. rolfsii or R. solani in three field experiments with beans, cotton, or tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 921–1124 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T. harzianum wheat-bran inoculum significantly decreased R. solani diseases in naturally infested field soils.

Taxon
beans, cotton, or tomatoese0
Treatment
wheat bran preparations of T. harzianum inoculume0
Interactor
R. solaniRhizoctonia solanie0pathogen
Second interactor
T. harzianumTrichoderma harzianume0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
diseasese0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Trichoderma harzianum
Trichoderma harzianum · Second interactorUS Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Systematic Botany and Mycology Laboratory, [1] · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In naturally infested soils, wheat bran preparations of T. harzianum inoculum significantly decreased diseases caused by S. rolfsii or R. solani in three field experiments with beans, cotton, or tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 921–1124 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T. harzianum wheat-bran inoculum significantly increased bean yield in field experiments.

Taxon
beanse0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“they significantly increased the yield of beans.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1130–1178 · show in text ↑

Triticum aestivum · growth · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Trichoderma harzianum · growth · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 17 positive, 1 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

Trichoderma harzianum · Agroathelia rolfsii · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Trichoderma harzianum · Rhizoctonia solani · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results agree

11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Trichoderma harzianum · Rhizoctonia solani · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

13 papers: 13 positive, 0 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

inoculation · Agroathelia rolfsii · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

inoculation · Rhizoctonia solani · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 5 positive, 3 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

inoculation · Agroathelia rolfsii · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

8 of 10 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.