Abstract
An isolate of Trichoderma harzianum capable of lysing mycelia of Sclerotium rolfsii and Rhizoctonia solani was isolated from a soil naturally infested with those pathogens. In culture, T. harzianum grew better than S. rolfsii and invaded its mycelium under growth conditions adverse to the pathogen; eg, high pentachloronitrobenzene concentrations, high pH levels, or low temperatures. Under greenhouse conditions, incorporation of the wheat-bran inoculum preparation of T. harzianum in pathogen-infested soil significantly reduced bean diseases caused by S. rolfsii, R. solani, or both, but its biocontrol capacity was inversely correlated with temperature. The wheat bran preparation of T. harzianum increased growth of bean plants in a noninfested soil and it controlled S. rolfsii more efficiently than a conidial suspension of the same antagonist. An uninoculated wheat bran preparation increased disease incidence. In naturally infested soils, wheat bran preparations of T. harzianum inoculum significantly decreased diseases caused by S. rolfsii or R. solani in three field experiments with beans, cotton, or tomatoes, and they significantly increased the yield of beans.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 12
Claim · model-written summary
Trichoderma harzianum lysed mycelia of Sclerotium rolfsii and Rhizoctonia solani.
- Interactor
- Sclerotium rolfsii
Agroathelia rolfsiie0pathogen - Second interactor
- Trichoderma harzianum
Trichoderma harzianume0biocontrol_agent - Outcome
- lysing myceliae0
Not reportedTaxon
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.


Verbatim
e0“An isolate of Trichoderma harzianum capable of lysing mycelia of Sclerotium rolfsii and Rhizoctonia solani was isolated from a soil naturally infested with those pathogens.”
Claim · model-written summary
In culture, T. harzianum grew better than S. rolfsii under conditions adverse to the pathogen.
- Interactor
- S. rolfsii
Agroathelia rolfsiie0pathogen - Second interactor
- T. harzianum
Trichoderma harzianume0biocontrol_agent - Outcome
- grew bettere0
Not reportedTaxon
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.


Verbatim
e0“In culture, T. harzianum grew better than S. rolfsii and invaded its mycelium under growth conditions adverse to the pathogen; eg, high pentachloronitrobenzene concentrations, high pH levels, or low temperatures.”
Claim · model-written summary
T. harzianum invaded S. rolfsii mycelium under adverse pathogen growth conditions.
- Interactor
- S. rolfsii
Agroathelia rolfsiie0pathogen - Second interactor
- T. harzianum
Trichoderma harzianume0biocontrol_agent - Outcome
- invaded its myceliume0
Not reportedTaxon
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.


Verbatim
e0“In culture, T. harzianum grew better than S. rolfsii and invaded its mycelium under growth conditions adverse to the pathogen; eg, high pentachloronitrobenzene concentrations, high pH levels, or low temperatures.”
Claim · model-written summary
T. harzianum wheat-bran inoculum significantly reduced S. rolfsii disease of greenhouse beans.
- Taxon
- beane0
- Treatment
- wheat-bran inoculum preparation of T. harzianume0
- Interactor
- S. rolfsii
Agroathelia rolfsiie0pathogen - Second interactor
- T. harzianum
Trichoderma harzianume0biocontrol_agent - Outcome
- bean diseases caused by S. rolfsiie0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Setting
- greenhousee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.


Verbatim
e0“Under greenhouse conditions, incorporation of the wheat-bran inoculum preparation of T. harzianum in pathogen-infested soil significantly reduced bean diseases caused by S. rolfsii, R. solani, or both”
Claim · model-written summary
T. harzianum wheat-bran inoculum significantly reduced R. solani disease of greenhouse beans.
- Taxon
- beane0
- Treatment
- wheat-bran inoculum preparation of T. harzianume0
- Interactor
- R. solani
Rhizoctonia solanie0pathogen - Second interactor
- T. harzianum
Trichoderma harzianume0biocontrol_agent - Outcome
- bean diseasese0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Setting
- greenhousee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.


Verbatim
e0“Under greenhouse conditions, incorporation of the wheat-bran inoculum preparation of T. harzianum in pathogen-infested soil significantly reduced bean diseases caused by S. rolfsii, R. solani, or both”
Claim · model-written summary
T. harzianum biocontrol capacity was inversely correlated with temperature.
Not reportedTaxonInteractorSetting
Verbatim
e0“its biocontrol capacity was inversely correlated with temperature.”
Claim · model-written summary
T. harzianum wheat-bran preparation increased bean growth in noninfested soil.
- Taxon
- beane0
- Treatment
- wheat bran preparation of T. harzianume0
- Interactor
- T. harzianum
Trichoderma harzianume0biocontrol_agent - Outcome
- growthe0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The wheat bran preparation of T. harzianum increased growth of bean plants in a noninfested soil”
Claim · model-written summary
Wheat-bran T. harzianum controlled S. rolfsii more efficiently than a conidial suspension.
- Interactor
- S. rolfsii
Agroathelia rolfsiie0pathogen - Outcome
- controlled S. rolfsiie0
- Direction
- more efficientlye0
- Comparator
- a conidial suspensione0
Not reportedTaxonTreatment
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“it controlled S. rolfsii more efficiently than a conidial suspension of the same antagonist.”
Claim · model-written summary
Uninoculated wheat bran increased disease incidence.
Not reportedTaxonComparator
Verbatim
e0“An uninoculated wheat bran preparation increased disease incidence.”
Claim · model-written summary
T. harzianum wheat-bran inoculum significantly decreased S. rolfsii diseases in naturally infested field soils.
- Taxon
- beans, cotton, or tomatoese0
- Treatment
- wheat bran preparations of T. harzianum inoculume0
- Interactor
- S. rolfsii
Agroathelia rolfsiie0pathogen - Second interactor
- T. harzianum
Trichoderma harzianume0biocontrol_agent - Outcome
- diseases caused by S. rolfsiie0
- Direction
- decreasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.


Verbatim
e0“In naturally infested soils, wheat bran preparations of T. harzianum inoculum significantly decreased diseases caused by S. rolfsii or R. solani in three field experiments with beans, cotton, or tomatoes”
Claim · model-written summary
T. harzianum wheat-bran inoculum significantly decreased R. solani diseases in naturally infested field soils.
- Taxon
- beans, cotton, or tomatoese0
- Treatment
- wheat bran preparations of T. harzianum inoculume0
- Interactor
- R. solani
Rhizoctonia solanie0pathogen - Second interactor
- T. harzianum
Trichoderma harzianume0biocontrol_agent - Outcome
- diseasese0
- Direction
- decreasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.


Verbatim
e0“In naturally infested soils, wheat bran preparations of T. harzianum inoculum significantly decreased diseases caused by S. rolfsii or R. solani in three field experiments with beans, cotton, or tomatoes”
Claim · model-written summary
T. harzianum wheat-bran inoculum significantly increased bean yield in field experiments.
Not reportedTreatmentComparator
Verbatim
e0“they significantly increased the yield of beans.”
The same questions in other papers
Triticum aestivum · growth · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →Trichoderma harzianum · growth · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results
16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
14 papers more in this group
See all 18 papers →Trichoderma harzianum · Agroathelia rolfsii · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
Trichoderma harzianum · Rhizoctonia solani · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results agree
10 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
7 papers more in this group
See all 11 papers →Trichoderma harzianum · Rhizoctonia solani · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree
12 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
9 papers more in this group
See all 13 papers →inoculation · Agroathelia rolfsii · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results
1 in the opposite direction
- negative
inoculation · Rhizoctonia solani · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →inoculation · Agroathelia rolfsii · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
8 of 10 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.