Paper · 2005 · International Journal of Fruit Science

An Evaluation of Blueberry Cultivars Grown in Plastic Tunnels in Douglas County, Oregon

Steve Renquist

5
claims
8
verbatim quotes
10
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Abstract Growing fruits and vegetables in plastic tunnels is known to accelerate maturity and protect quality. There are several studies on highbush blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum) that demonstrate the ability of row covers to advance or delay crop maturity depending on how they are manipulated. Accelerating or delaying harvest time can prove to be very lucrative for producers. However, before producers start putting plastic tunnels over their crops it is important to know how blueberry cultivars will behave when grown under plastic. Six cultivars of southern highbush blueberry and eight cultivars of northern highbush blueberry were grown in a high hoop plastic tunnel for two seasons. Blueberry plants were grown under plastic from February 1 until their harvest was completed each year. After harvest, the plastic covering over the hoops was removed to help the blueberry plants develop fruit buds and meet winter chill requirements. On February 1 the plastic covering was returned to the high hoop tunnel after chilling requirements were met. As expected, fruit maturity dates were 1-3 weeks earlier for all the highbush blueberries grown inside the tunnel versus the same cultivars grown outside. The difference in maturity dates between cultivars grown under plastic and outside did change from one year to the next because of variation in the weather. Despite potential for poor pollination of blueberries in plastic tunnels, yields were significantly enhanced for four cultivars when grown under plastic tunnels. ‘Toro’, ‘Nui’, ‘Legacy’, and ‘Misty’ showed yield gains ranging from 1 to 4 times when grown under a plastic tunnel. Seed numbers per fruit were not significantly impacted by growing plants inside our tunnel.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

As expected, fruit maturity dates were 1-3 weeks earlier for all the highbush blueberries grown inside the tunnel versus the same cultivars grown outside.

Taxon
highbush blueberriesVaccinium corymbosume0
Treatment
inside the tunnele0
Outcome
fruit maturity datese0
Direction
earliere0
Value
1-3 weekse0
Comparator
grown outsidee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vaccinium corymbosum
Vaccinium corymbosum · TaxonThe original Uploader was Oven Fresh at English Wikipedia · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“As expected, fruit maturity dates were 1-3 weeks earlier for all the highbush blueberries grown inside the tunnel versus the same cultivars grown outside.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1055–1209 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The difference in maturity dates between cultivars grown under plastic and outside did change from one year to the next because of variation in the weather.

Taxon
blueberryt0
Treatment
grown under plastice0
Outcome
difference in maturity datese0
Direction
did changee0
Comparator
outsidee0

Verbatim

e0

“The difference in maturity dates between cultivars grown under plastic and outside did change from one year to the next because of variation in the weather.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1210–1366 · show in text ↑
t0

“Blueberry Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Despite potential for poor pollination of blueberries in plastic tunnels, yields were significantly enhanced for four cultivars when grown under plastic tunnels.

Taxon
blueberriese0
Treatment
plastic tunnelse0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Despite potential for poor pollination of blueberries in plastic tunnels, yields were significantly enhanced for four cultivars when grown under plastic tunnels.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1367–1528 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

‘Toro’, ‘Nui’, ‘Legacy’, and ‘Misty’ showed yield gains ranging from 1 to 4 times when grown under a plastic tunnel.

Taxon
Blueberryt0
Material
‘Toro’, ‘Nui’, ‘Legacy’, and ‘Misty’e0
Treatment
plastic tunnele0
Outcome
yield gainse0
Direction
gainse0
Value
1 to 4 timese0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“‘Toro’, ‘Nui’, ‘Legacy’, and ‘Misty’ showed yield gains ranging from 1 to 4 times when grown under a plastic tunnel.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1529–1645 · show in text ↑
t0

“Blueberry Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed numbers per fruit were not significantly impacted by growing plants inside our tunnel.

Taxon
Blueberryt0
Treatment
inside our tunnele0
Outcome
Seed numbers per fruite0
Direction
not significantly impactede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Seed numbers per fruit were not significantly impacted by growing plants inside our tunnel.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1646–1737 · show in text ↑
t0

“Blueberry Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–36 · show in text ↑

protected cultivation · yield · VacciniumResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.