Paper · 2014 · Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis

Effects of Soil Management Practices on Key Soil Quality Indicators and Indices in Pearl Millet (Pennisetum americanum(L.) Leeke)–Based System in Hot Semi-arid Inceptisols

K. L. Sharma; J. Kusuma Grace; M. Suma Chandrika; et al.

20
claims
52
verbatim quotes
11
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Rainfed Inceptisol soils, despite their agricultural potential, pose serious problems, including soil erosion, low fertility, nutrient imbalance, and low soil organic matter, and ultimately lead to poor soil quality. To address these constraints, two long-term experiments were initiated to study conservation agricultural practices, comprising conventional and low tillage as well as conjunctive use of organic and inorganic sources of nutrients in Inceptisol soils of Agra center of the All-India Coordinated Research Project for Dryland Agriculture (AICRPDA). The first experiment included tillage and nutrient-management practices, whereas the second studied only conjunctive nutrient-management practices. Both used pearl millet (Pennisetum americanum (L.) Linn) as test crop. These experiments were adopted for soil quality assessment studies at 4 and 8 years after their completion, respectively, at the Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture (CRIDA), Hyderabad, India. Soil quality assessment was done by identifying the key indicators using principal component analysis (PCA), linear scoring technique (LST), soil quality indices (SQI), and relative soil quality indices (RSQI). Results revealed that most of the soil quality parameters were significantly influenced by the management treatments in both the experiments. In experiment 1, soil quality indices varied from 0.86 to 1.08 across the treatments. Tillage as well as the nutrient-management treatments played a significant role in influencing the SQI. Among the tillage practices, low tillage with one interculture + weedicide application resulted in a greater soil quality index (0.98) followed by conventional tillage + one interculture (0.94), which was at par with low tillage + one interculture (0.93). Among the nutrient-management treatments, application of 100% organic sources of nutrients gave the greatest SQI of 1.05, whereas the other two practices of 50% nitrogen (N) (organic) + 50% (inorganic source) (0.92) and 100% N (inorganic source) (0.88) were statistically at par with each other. The various parameters that emerged as key soil quality indicators along with their percentage contributions toward SQI were organic carbon (17%), exchangeable calcium (Ca) (10%), available zinc (Zn) (9%), available copper (Cu) (6%), dehydrogenase assay (6%), microbial biomass carbon (25%) and mean weight diameter of soil aggregates (27%). In experiment 2, SQI varied from 2.33 to 3.47, and 50% urea + 50% farmyard manure (FYM) showed the greatest SQI of 3.47, which was at par with 100% RDF + 25 kg zinc sulfate (ZnSO4) (3.20). Under this set of treatments, the key soil quality indicators and their contributions to SQI were organic carbon (19%), available N (20%), exchangeable Ca (3%), available Zn (4%) and Cu (17%), labile carbon (20%), and mean weight diameter of soil aggregates (17%). The quantitative relationship established in this study between mean pearl millet yields (Y) and RSQI irrespective of the management treatments for both the experiments together could be quite useful to predict the yield quantitatively with respect to a given change in soil quality for these rainfed Inceptisols. The methodology used in this study is not only useful to these Inceptisols but can also be used for varying soil types, climate, and associated conditions elsewhere in the world.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil quality parameters were significantly influenced by management treatments in both experiments.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanuse1
Treatment
management treatmentse0
Outcome
soil quality parameterse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“most of the soil quality parameters were significantly influenced by the management treatments in both the experiments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1222–1340 · show in text ↑
e1

“Both used pearl millet (Pennisetum americanum (L.) Linn) as test crop.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–781 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The soil quality index ranged from 0.86 to 1.08 in experiment 1.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanuse1
Outcome
soil quality indicese0
Value
0.86 to 1.08e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In experiment 1, soil quality indices varied from 0.86 to 1.08 across the treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1342–1427 · show in text ↑
e1

“Both used pearl millet (Pennisetum americanum (L.) Linn) as test crop.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–781 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low tillage plus interculture and weedicide gave a greater soil quality index of 0.98.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanuse1
Treatment
low tillage with one interculture + weedicide applicatione0
Outcome
soil quality indexe0
Direction
greatere0
Value
0.98e0
Qualifier
0.94e0
Comparator
conventional tillage + one interculturee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“low tillage with one interculture + weedicide application resulted in a greater soil quality index (0.98) followed by conventional tillage + one interculture (0.94)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1561–1725 · show in text ↑
e1

“Both used pearl millet (Pennisetum americanum (L.) Linn) as test crop.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–781 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional tillage plus interculture had an SQI of 0.94, at par with low tillage plus interculture at 0.93.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanuse1
Treatment
conventional tillage + one interculturee0
Outcome
soil quality indexe2
Direction
at pare0
Value
0.94e0
Qualifier
0.93e0
Comparator
low tillage + one interculturee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“conventional tillage + one interculture (0.94), which was at par with low tillage + one interculture (0.93)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1679–1786 · show in text ↑
e1

“Both used pearl millet (Pennisetum americanum (L.) Linn) as test crop.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–781 · show in text ↑
e2

“low tillage with one interculture + weedicide application resulted in a greater soil quality index (0.98) followed by conventional tillage + one interculture (0.94)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1561–1725 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 100% organic nutrient source treatment gave the greatest SQI of 1.05.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanuse1
Treatment
100% organic sources of nutrientse0
Outcome
SQIe0
Direction
greateste0
Value
1.05e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of 100% organic sources of nutrients gave the greatest SQI of 1.05”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1830–1908 · show in text ↑
e1

“Both used pearl millet (Pennisetum americanum (L.) Linn) as test crop.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–781 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

A half organic and half inorganic nitrogen treatment had SQI 0.92, statistically at par with fully inorganic nitrogen at 0.88.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanuse1
Treatment
50% nitrogen (N) (organic) + 50% (inorganic source)e0
Outcome
SQIe2
Direction
at pare0
Value
0.92e0
Qualifier
0.88e0
Comparator
100% N (inorganic source)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“50% nitrogen (N) (organic) + 50% (inorganic source) (0.92) and 100% N (inorganic source) (0.88) were statistically at par with each other”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1945–2082 · show in text ↑
e1

“Both used pearl millet (Pennisetum americanum (L.) Linn) as test crop.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–781 · show in text ↑
e2

“application of 100% organic sources of nutrients gave the greatest SQI of 1.05”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1830–1908 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In experiment 1 organic carbon contributed 17% to SQI.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanuse2
Compound
organic carbone0
Outcome
percentage contributions toward SQIe1
Value
17%e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“organic carbon (17%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2209–2229 · show in text ↑
e1

“key soil quality indicators along with their percentage contributions toward SQI were”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2123–2208 · show in text ↑
e2

“Both used pearl millet (Pennisetum americanum (L.) Linn) as test crop.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–781 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In experiment 1 exchangeable calcium contributed 10% to SQI.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanuse2
Compound
exchangeable calcium (Ca)e0
Outcome
percentage contributions toward SQIe1
Value
10%e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“exchangeable calcium (Ca) (10%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2231–2262 · show in text ↑
e1

“percentage contributions toward SQI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2168–2203 · show in text ↑
e2

“Both used pearl millet (Pennisetum americanum (L.) Linn) as test crop.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–781 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In experiment 1 available zinc contributed 9% to SQI.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanuse2
Compound
available zinc (Zn)e0
Outcome
percentage contributions toward SQIe1
Value
9%e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“available zinc (Zn) (9%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2264–2288 · show in text ↑
e1

“percentage contributions toward SQI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2168–2203 · show in text ↑
e2

“Both used pearl millet (Pennisetum americanum (L.) Linn) as test crop.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–781 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In experiment 1 available copper contributed 6% to SQI.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanuse2
Compound
available copper (Cu)e0
Outcome
percentage contributions toward SQIe1
Value
6%e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“available copper (Cu) (6%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2290–2316 · show in text ↑
e1

“percentage contributions toward SQI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2168–2203 · show in text ↑
e2

“Both used pearl millet (Pennisetum americanum (L.) Linn) as test crop.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–781 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In experiment 1 dehydrogenase assay contributed 6% to SQI.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanuse2
Gene
dehydrogenasee0
Outcome
percentage contributions toward SQIe1
Value
6%e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“dehydrogenase assay (6%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2318–2342 · show in text ↑
e1

“percentage contributions toward SQI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2168–2203 · show in text ↑
e2

“Both used pearl millet (Pennisetum americanum (L.) Linn) as test crop.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–781 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In experiment 1 microbial biomass carbon contributed 25% to SQI.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanuse2
Compound
microbial biomass carbone0
Outcome
percentage contributions toward SQIe1
Value
25%e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“microbial biomass carbon (25%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2344–2374 · show in text ↑
e1

“percentage contributions toward SQI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2168–2203 · show in text ↑
e2

“Both used pearl millet (Pennisetum americanum (L.) Linn) as test crop.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–781 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In experiment 1 mean weight diameter of soil aggregates contributed 27% to SQI.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanuse2
Outcome
percentage contributions toward SQIe1
Value
27%e0
Qualifier
mean weight diameter of soil aggregatese0
Setting
Inceptisol soilse3

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mean weight diameter of soil aggregates (27%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2379–2424 · show in text ↑
e1

“percentage contributions toward SQI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2168–2203 · show in text ↑
e2

“Both used pearl millet (Pennisetum americanum (L.) Linn) as test crop.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–781 · show in text ↑
e3

“Inceptisol soils of Agra center”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 450–481 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Experiment 2 SQI ranged from 2.33 to 3.47.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanuse1
Outcome
SQIe0
Value
2.33 to 3.47e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In experiment 2, SQI varied from 2.33 to 3.47”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2426–2471 · show in text ↑
e1

“Both used pearl millet (Pennisetum americanum (L.) Linn) as test crop.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–781 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Half urea and half farmyard manure gave greatest SQI 3.47.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanuse1
Treatment
50% urea + 50% farmyard manure (FYM)e0
Outcome
SQIe0
Direction
greateste0
Value
3.47e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“50% urea + 50% farmyard manure (FYM) showed the greatest SQI of 3.47”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2477–2545 · show in text ↑
e1

“Both used pearl millet (Pennisetum americanum (L.) Linn) as test crop.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–781 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The half urea and half manure treatment was at par with RDF plus zinc sulfate SQI 3.20.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanuse1
Treatment
50% urea + 50% farmyard manure (FYM)e0
Outcome
SQIe0
Direction
at pare0
Value
3.47e0
Qualifier
3.20e0
Comparator
100% RDF + 25 kg zinc sulfate (ZnSO4)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“50% urea + 50% farmyard manure (FYM) showed the greatest SQI of 3.47, which was at par with 100% RDF + 25 kg zinc sulfate (ZnSO4) (3.20)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2477–2613 · show in text ↑
e1

“Both used pearl millet (Pennisetum americanum (L.) Linn) as test crop.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–781 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In experiment 2 organic carbon, available nitrogen, and exchangeable calcium contributed 19%, 20%, and 3% to SQI, respectively.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanuse2
Compound
organic carbone0
Outcome
contributions to SQIe1
Value
19%e0
Qualifier
available N (20%), exchangeable Ca (3%)e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“organic carbon (19%), available N (20%), exchangeable Ca (3%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2713–2774 · show in text ↑
e1

“their contributions to SQI were”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2681–2712 · show in text ↑
e2

“Both used pearl millet (Pennisetum americanum (L.) Linn) as test crop.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–781 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In experiment 2 zinc and copper contributed 4% and 17% to SQI.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanuse2
Compound
available Zne0
Outcome
contributions to SQIe1
Value
4%e0
Qualifier
Cu (17%)e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“available Zn (4%) and Cu (17%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2776–2806 · show in text ↑
e1

“their contributions to SQI were”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2681–2712 · show in text ↑
e2

“Both used pearl millet (Pennisetum americanum (L.) Linn) as test crop.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–781 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In experiment 2 labile carbon and aggregate mean weight diameter each contributed 20% and 17% to SQI.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanuse2
Compound
labile carbone0
Outcome
contributions to SQIe1
Value
20%e0
Qualifier
mean weight diameter of soil aggregates (17%)e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“labile carbon (20%), and mean weight diameter of soil aggregates (17%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2808–2878 · show in text ↑
e1

“their contributions to SQI were”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2681–2712 · show in text ↑
e2

“Both used pearl millet (Pennisetum americanum (L.) Linn) as test crop.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–781 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The relation of mean pearl millet yield to relative soil quality index may permit quantitative yield prediction from soil quality change.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanuse0
Outcome
mean pearl millet yields (Y)e0
Qualifier
RSQIe0
Setting
rainfed Inceptisolse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The quantitative relationship established in this study between mean pearl millet yields (Y) and RSQI irrespective of the management treatments for both the experiments together could be quite useful to predict the yield quantitatively with respect to a given change in soil quality for these rainfed Inceptisols.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2880–3193 · show in text ↑

tillage · quality: general · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

fertilization · quality: general · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.