Paper · 1977 · Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture

Evaluation of oat forage for finishing prime lambs on the Northern Tablelands, New South Wales

KA Archer; FG Swain

12
claims
28
verbatim quotes
3
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In 1967 at Armidale, New South Wales, oats (Avena sativa cv. Cooba) were grown with or without 180 kg N ha-I and rotationally grazed on a three paddock system from July 13 to November 16 with Border Leicester x Merino lambs. Stocking rates were 20,40 or 60 sheep ha-1 (experiment 1). In 1968 (experiment 2) oats were rotationally grazed on either a three or four paddock system at stocking rates of 20, 30 or 40 lambs ha-1. Grazing began on either June 6 or July 17 and terminated on November 20. The rotational grazing systems allowed for a grazing period of two weeks and regrowth periods of four or six weeks. Application of nitrogen increased the quantity of dry matter available prior to grazing in 1967 by 20 per cent but did not affect regrowth rates during winter and early spring. In 1968, approximately 33 per cent more forage was available prior to grazing in mid-July than in early June. There was little effect of grazing management on the rate of regrowth. In both years, regrowth rates were low during winter and carry over residue was required to provide a continuity of available forage. Liveweight gains of lambs during winter and early spring reached 170 to 200 g head-1 day-1 at stocking rates of 20 or 30 sheep ha-1 for the early and late commencement of grazing treatments respectively. Lower gains to 120 g head-1 day-1 were recorded for six to eight weeks at higher stocking rates but subsequent liveweight losses occurred; these being greater if grazing commenced early. Neither N nor grazing management system materially affected liveweight gains. Approximately 1.5 kg available dry matter head-1day-1 was required at the start of each fortnightly grazing period to ensure maximum liveweight gains

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen application increased dry matter available prior to grazing by 20 per cent in 1967 in oats.

Material
cv. Coobae2
Treatment
Application of nitrogene0
Outcome
dry matter available prior to grazinge0
Direction
increasede0
Value
20 per cente0
Comparator
without 180 kg N ha-Ie1
Setting
Armidale, New South Walese3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of nitrogen increased the quantity of dry matter available prior to grazing in 1967 by 20 per cent but did not affect regrowth rates during winter and early spring”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 613–788 · show in text ↑
e1

“grown with or without 180 kg N ha-I”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 73–108 · show in text ↑
e2

“oats (Avena sativa cv. Cooba) were grown”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 38–78 · show in text ↑
e3

“In 1967 at Armidale, New South Wales”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen application did not affect oat regrowth rates during winter and early spring.

Treatment
Application of nitrogene0
Outcome
regrowth rates during winter and early springe0
Direction
no_changeinferrede0
Comparator
without 180 kg N ha-Ie1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of nitrogen increased the quantity of dry matter available prior to grazing in 1967 by 20 per cent but did not affect regrowth rates during winter and early spring”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 613–788 · show in text ↑
e1

“grown with or without 180 kg N ha-I”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 73–108 · show in text ↑
e2

“oats (Avena sativa cv. Cooba) were grown”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 38–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grazing from mid-July gave about 33 per cent more forage available before grazing than grazing from early June in 1968.

Treatment
mid-Julye0
Outcome
forage was available prior to grazinge0
Direction
moree0
Value
33 per cente0
Comparator
early Junee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In 1968, approximately 33 per cent more forage was available prior to grazing in mid-July than in early June”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 790–898 · show in text ↑
e1

“In 1968 (experiment 2) oats were rotationally grazed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 284–336 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grazing management had little effect on the rate of oat regrowth.

Treatment
grazing managemente0
Outcome
rate of regrowthe0
Direction
no_changeinferrede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was little effect of grazing management on the rate of regrowth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 900–969 · show in text ↑
e1

“In 1968 (experiment 2) oats were rotationally grazed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 284–336 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lamb liveweight gains in winter and early spring reached 170 to 200 g head-1 day-1 at 20 or 30 sheep ha-1 on oats.

Treatment
stocking rates of 20 or 30 sheep ha-1e0
Outcome
Liveweight gains of lambse0
Value
170 to 200 g head-1 day-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Liveweight gains of lambs during winter and early spring reached 170 to 200 g head-1 day-1 at stocking rates of 20 or 30 sheep ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1105–1236 · show in text ↑
e1

“In 1968 (experiment 2) oats were rotationally grazed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 284–336 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher stocking rates lowered lamb liveweight gains to 120 g head-1 day-1 for six to eight weeks.

Treatment
higher stocking ratese0
Outcome
Liveweight gainse2
Direction
Lowere0
Value
120 g head-1 day-1e0
Qualifier
for six to eight weekse0
Comparator
stocking rates of 20 or 30 sheep ha-1e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lower gains to 120 g head-1 day-1 were recorded for six to eight weeks at higher stocking rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1309–1404 · show in text ↑
e1

“In 1968 (experiment 2) oats were rotationally grazed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 284–336 · show in text ↑
e2

“Liveweight gains of lambs during winter and early spring reached 170 to 200 g head-1 day-1 at stocking rates of 20 or 30 sheep ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1105–1236 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Subsequent liveweight losses in lambs were greater when grazing commenced early.

Treatment
grazing commenced earlye0
Outcome
liveweight lossese0
Direction
greatere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“subsequent liveweight losses occurred; these being greater if grazing commenced early”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1409–1494 · show in text ↑
e1

“In 1968 (experiment 2) oats were rotationally grazed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 284–336 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen did not materially affect lamb liveweight gains.

Treatment
Ne0
Outcome
liveweight gainse0
Direction
no_changeinferrede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Neither N nor grazing management system materially affected liveweight gains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1496–1572 · show in text ↑
e1

“In 1968 (experiment 2) oats were rotationally grazed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 284–336 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grazing management system did not materially affect lamb liveweight gains.

Treatment
grazing management systeme0
Outcome
liveweight gainse0
Direction
no_changeinferrede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Neither N nor grazing management system materially affected liveweight gains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1496–1572 · show in text ↑
e1

“In 1968 (experiment 2) oats were rotationally grazed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 284–336 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Oat regrowth rates were low during winter in both years.

Outcome
regrowth ratese0
Qualifier
low during wintere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In both years, regrowth rates were low during winter and carry over residue was required to provide a continuity of available forage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 971–1103 · show in text ↑
e1

“In 1968 (experiment 2) oats were rotationally grazed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 284–336 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Carry-over residue is required to give a continuous supply of available forage in oats grazing.

Treatment
carry over residuee0
Outcome
continuity of available foragee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“carry over residue was required to provide a continuity of available forage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1028–1103 · show in text ↑
e1

“In 1968 (experiment 2) oats were rotationally grazed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 284–336 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

About 1.5 kg available dry matter per head per day should be present at the start of each fortnightly grazing period to ensure maximum liveweight gains.

Outcome
available dry mattere0
Value
Approximately 1.5 kge0
Qualifier
at the start of each fortnightly grazing periode0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Approximately 1.5 kg available dry matter head-1day-1 was required at the start of each fortnightly grazing period to ensure maximum liveweight gains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1574–1723 · show in text ↑
e1

“In 1968 (experiment 2) oats were rotationally grazed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 284–336 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · growth · Avena sativa (oats)Positive and negative results

48 papers: 38 positive, 10 negative or no effect

37 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

44 papers more in this group

See all 48 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.