Paper · 2005 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

Alternate Use of Good and Saline Irrigation Water (1:1) on the Performance of Tomato Cultivar

E. A. Elamin; N. S. Al-Wehaibi

8
claims
17
verbatim quotes
10
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract A pot experiment was set in a completely randomized design with factorial arrangement using tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum cv “Tatto”) to examine the effect of cyclic irrigation with good and saline waters and mineral fertilization on yield and mineral constituents. The experiment consisted of two irrigation practices (W1 and W2) and two levels of phosphorus (P1 and P2) equivalent to 350 and 470 kg superphosphate/ha, respectively, added at the beginning of the experiment. The nitrogen (N) levels were 0, 800, and 1600 kg urea/ha, respectively, split into six doses. A basal dose of potassium (K) was added at the rate of 350 kg K2SO4/ha. One healthy seedling of tomato was transplanted three weeks after germination to each pot (0.07 m2) filled with soil classified as Torrifluvents. The treatments were replicated thrice and the pots were put in an open area at the Rumais Research Station facility. The quantity of irrigation water applied was approximated according to the data available at Rumais station. Similar quantities of good and saline waters were applied alternately to all treatments. The water-stress treatment (cyclic irrigation) started 15 d from transplanting. Yield, total soluble solids (TSS), and mineral constituents were determined. The results indicated that alternate irrigation reduced yield, but the differences between the water treatments were not significant. Nitrogen application showed a significant linear response in tomato fruit yield, and the interaction between treatments was not significant. It was also revealed that the differences between the P treatments were significant, with P2 (470 kg/ha) giving lower yields. Cyclic irrigation and mineral fertilization increased significantly the TSS. Nitrogen application at the rate of 800 kg/ha (N2) gave the highest TSS in the two water treatments at a P application rate of 470 kg/ha (P2). On the other hand, increasing the nitrogen (N) application rate to 1600 kg/ha (N4) reduced the total soluble solids in the presence of P in the two water treatments. Keywords: Tattocyclicsalinetotal soluble solids (TSS)Torrifluvents

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Alternate irrigation reduced tomato yield, but the water-treatment difference was not significant.

Material
Tattoe0
Treatment
alternate irrigatione1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
reducede1
Comparator
water treatmentse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“using tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum cv “Tatto”)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 95–144 · show in text ↑
e1

“alternate irrigation reduced yield, but the differences between the water treatments were not significant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1298–1404 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen application produced a significant linear response in tomato fruit yield.

Treatment
Nitrogen applicatione1
Outcome
tomato fruit yielde1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tomato fruit yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1466–1484 · show in text ↑
e1

“Nitrogen application showed a significant linear response in tomato fruit yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1405–1484 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The interaction between treatments did not significantly affect tomato yield.

Treatment
interaction between treatmentse1
Outcome
tomato fruit yielde2

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“using tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum cv “Tatto”)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 95–144 · show in text ↑
e1

“the interaction between treatments was not significant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1490–1545 · show in text ↑
e2

“tomato fruit yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1466–1484 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The higher phosphorus treatment, P2 at 470 kg/ha, gave significantly lower tomato yields.

Treatment
P2 (470 kg/ha)e1
Outcome
yieldse1
Direction
lowere1
Comparator
P treatmentse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum cv “Tatto”)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 101–144 · show in text ↑
e1

“differences between the P treatments were significant, with P2 (470 kg/ha) giving lower yields.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1576–1671 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cyclic irrigation significantly increased tomato total soluble solids.

Treatment
Cyclic irrigatione1
Outcome
TSSe1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum cv “Tatto”)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 101–144 · show in text ↑
e1

“Cyclic irrigation and mineral fertilization increased significantly the TSS.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1672–1748 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mineral fertilization significantly increased tomato total soluble solids.

Treatment
mineral fertilizatione1
Outcome
TSSe1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum cv “Tatto”)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 101–144 · show in text ↑
e1

“Cyclic irrigation and mineral fertilization increased significantly the TSS.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1672–1748 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 470 kg/ha phosphorus, 800 kg/ha nitrogen gave the highest tomato TSS under both water treatments.

Treatment
800 kg/ha (N2)e1
Outcome
TSSe1
Direction
higheste1
Qualifier
two water treatments at a P application rate of 470 kg/ha (P2)e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum cv “Tatto”)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 101–144 · show in text ↑
e1

“Nitrogen application at the rate of 800 kg/ha (N2) gave the highest TSS in the two water treatments at a P application rate of 470 kg/ha (P2).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1749–1891 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing nitrogen application to 1600 kg/ha reduced tomato TSS with phosphorus in both water treatments.

Treatment
nitrogen (N) application rate to 1600 kg/ha (N4)e1
Outcome
total soluble solidse1
Direction
reducede1
Qualifier
in the presence of P in the two water treatmentse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum cv “Tatto”)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 101–144 · show in text ↑
e1

“increasing the nitrogen (N) application rate to 1600 kg/ha (N4) reduced the total soluble solids in the presence of P in the two water treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1911–2057 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · quality: sugar starch · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

31 papers: 24 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 24 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

irrigation · quality: sugar starch · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

63 papers: 46 positive, 17 negative or no effect

45 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

59 papers more in this group

See all 63 papers →

fertilization · quality: sugar starch · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

144 papers: 129 positive, 15 negative or no effect

128 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

140 papers more in this group

See all 144 papers →

irrigation · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

344 papers: 239 positive, 105 negative or no effect

104 papers in the same direction as this paper · 239 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

340 papers more in this group

See all 344 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.