Abstract
This study examined whether zone tillage was a viable alternative to conventional tillage for carrot [Daucus carota L. var. sativus (Hoffm.) Arcang.] and onion (Allium cepa L.) production on muck soils. Total and marketable yields under zone tillage were e qual to (carrot) or greater than (onion) yields under conventional tillage. Carrot yields did not differ between raised and flat bed treatments. Key words: Reduced tillage, conventional tillage, Daucus carota L. var. sativus (Hoffm.) Arcang.); Allium cepa L.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 3
Claim · model-written summary
Carrot total and marketable yields under zone tillage equaled conventional tillage.
- Taxon
- carrot
Daucus carotae0 - Treatment
- zone tillagee0
- Outcome
- Total and marketable yieldse0
- Direction
- e qual toe0
- Comparator
- conventional tillagee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Total and marketable yields under zone tillage were e qual to (carrot) or greater than (onion) yields under conventional tillage”
Claim · model-written summary
Onion total and marketable yields were greater under zone tillage than conventional tillage.
- Taxon
- onion
Allium cepae0 - Treatment
- zone tillagee0
- Outcome
- Total and marketable yieldse0
- Direction
- greater thane0
- Comparator
- conventional tillagee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Total and marketable yields under zone tillage were e qual to (carrot) or greater than (onion) yields under conventional tillage”
Claim · model-written summary
Carrot yields did not differ between raised and flat beds.
- Taxon
- CarrotDaucus carotae0
- Treatment
- raisede0
- Outcome
- Carrot yieldse0
- Direction
- did not differe0
- Comparator
- flat bed treatmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Carrot yields did not differ between raised and flat bed treatments”
The same questions in other papers
tillage · quality: postharvest · Daucus carota (carrot)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- negative
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →tillage · quality: postharvest · Allium cepa (onion)Results agree
4 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.