Paper · 2004 · Agricultural and Forest Entomology

Susceptibility of strawberry cultivars to the vine weevil Otiorhynchus sulcatus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae)

Richard S. Cowles

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
11
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Abstract 1 The feeding preference of vine weevil, Otiorhynchus sulcatus (Fabricius), adults for foliage from 21 commercial cultivars of strawberries is investigated using binary choice tests with leaf disks, using ‘Honeoye’ as a standard against which all other cultivars are compared. ‘Delmarvel’, ‘Idea’, ‘Lester’, ‘Primetime’ and ‘Seneca’ are not preferred. 2 Variation in leaf nitrogen content is correlated with feeding preference, but does not explain all the variation, because outliers exist for both preferred and nonpreferred cultivars. 3 Removal of leaf hairs with adhesive tape permits their role in deterrence to be evaluated. Eight of the 21 cultivars have deterrent leaf hairs. Paradoxically, some highly preferred cultivars (e.g. ‘Latestar’ and ‘Tristar’) have deterrent leaf hairs, and four of the five nonpreferred cultivars lack significantly deterrent leaf hairs. 4 The 21 tested cultivars do not differ in their suitability for vine weevil larval development. 5 Differences in cultivar susceptibility to vine weevil in the field may involve interactions between the palatability and nutritional value of foliage, which influence fecundity and egg placement, and the tolerance of strawberry plants to larval feeding, determined by root biomass. The nonpreference traits found in the foliage of commercial cultivars of strawberry are present by chance. Accordingly, further selective breeding to enhance strawberry varietal tolerance to vine weevils may be possible.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Delmarvel, Idea, Lester, Primetime and Seneca strawberry cultivars are not preferred by vine weevil adults.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Material
‘Delmarvel’, ‘Idea’, ‘Lester’, ‘Primetime’ and ‘Seneca’e1
Interactor
Otiorhynchus sulcatusOtiorhynchus sulcatuse2pest
Outcome
not preferrede1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Otiorhynchus sulcatus
Otiorhynchus sulcatus · InteractorOpuntia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Susceptibility of strawberry cultivars to the vine weevil Otiorhynchus sulcatus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–79 · show in text ↑
e1

“‘Delmarvel’, ‘Idea’, ‘Lester’, ‘Primetime’ and ‘Seneca’ are not preferred”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 286–359 · show in text ↑
e2

“vine weevil, Otiorhynchus sulcatus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 37–71 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf nitrogen content is correlated with feeding preference of vine weevil but does not explain all the variation.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Compound
nitrogene1
Outcome
feeding preferencee1
Qualifier
does not explain all the variatione1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Susceptibility of strawberry cultivars to the vine weevil Otiorhynchus sulcatus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–79 · show in text ↑
e1

“Variation in leaf nitrogen content is correlated with feeding preference, but does not explain all the variation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 363–475 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Eight of the 21 strawberry cultivars have deterrent leaf hairs.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Outcome
deterrent leaf hairse3
Value
Eight of the 21e3

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Susceptibility of strawberry cultivars to the vine weevil Otiorhynchus sulcatus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–79 · show in text ↑
e3

“Eight of the 21 cultivars have deterrent leaf hairs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 640–691 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Some highly preferred cultivars, Latestar and Tristar, have deterrent leaf hairs.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Material
‘Latestar’ and ‘Tristar’e4
Outcome
deterrent leaf hairse4

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Susceptibility of strawberry cultivars to the vine weevil Otiorhynchus sulcatus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–79 · show in text ↑
e4

“Paradoxically, some highly preferred cultivars (e.g. ‘Latestar’ and ‘Tristar’) have deterrent leaf hairs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 693–797 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Four of the five nonpreferred cultivars lack significantly deterrent leaf hairs.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Outcome
deterrent leaf hairse5
Value
four of the fivee5
Qualifier
lack significantlye5

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Susceptibility of strawberry cultivars to the vine weevil Otiorhynchus sulcatus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–79 · show in text ↑
e5

“four of the five nonpreferred cultivars lack significantly deterrent leaf hairs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 803–882 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 21 tested strawberry cultivars do not differ in their suitability for vine weevil larval development.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Interactor
vine weevile6pest
Outcome
suitability for vine weevil larval developmente6
Direction
do not differe6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Susceptibility of strawberry cultivars to the vine weevil Otiorhynchus sulcatus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–79 · show in text ↑
e6

“The 21 tested cultivars do not differ in their suitability for vine weevil larval development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 886–979 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Differences in cultivar susceptibility to vine weevil in the field may involve interactions between palatability and nutritional value of foliage and larval tolerance set by root biomass.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Interactor
vine weevile7pest
Outcome
cultivar susceptibility to vine weevil in the fielde7
Qualifier
interactions between the palatability and nutritional value of foliagee7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Susceptibility of strawberry cultivars to the vine weevil Otiorhynchus sulcatus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–79 · show in text ↑
e7

“Differences in cultivar susceptibility to vine weevil in the field may involve interactions between the palatability and nutritional value of foliage, which influence fecundity and egg placement, and the tolerance of strawberry plants to larval feeding, determined by root biomass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 983–1263 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The nonpreference traits in the foliage of commercial strawberry cultivars are present by chance.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Outcome
nonpreference traitse1
Qualifier
present by chancee1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Susceptibility of strawberry cultivars to the vine weevil Otiorhynchus sulcatus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–79 · show in text ↑
e1

“The nonpreference traits found in the foliage of commercial cultivars of strawberry are present by chance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1265–1370 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Further selective breeding to enhance strawberry varietal tolerance to vine weevils may be possible.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae1
Outcome
varietal tolerance to vine weevilse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“further selective breeding to enhance strawberry varietal tolerance to vine weevils may be possible”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1385–1484 · show in text ↑