Paper · 2007 · Plant Disease

First Report of Powdery Mildew on Greenhouse Tomatoes Caused by Oidium neolycopersici in Michoacan, Mexico

G. Rodríguez-Alvarado; J. García-López; R. Rodríguez-Fernández; et al.

4
claims
10
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

During June and July of 2007, powdery mildew-infected tomato (Lycopersicum esculentum Mill. cv. Reserve) plants were observed in a commercial greenhouse with an open hydroponic system in Morelia County. Disease incidence increased from 0.5% to more than 90% in 1 month. Infected plants showed leaves with irregular areas of dense, white mycelium covering most of the upper surface. Microscopic analysis showed hyaline, septate hyphae with lobed appressoria. Conidia were ellipsoid to ovoid and 30 to 45 (38) μm × 15 to 20 (16) μm. Conidiophores were erect, 80 to 120 (103) μm, consisted of a foot cell 42 to 67 (56) μm, and two to three short cells. Conidia were produced singly. On the basis of the observed morphological characteristics, the fungus was identified as Oidium neolycopersici L. Kiss (1). Pathogenicity tests were conducted on fourth true-leaf tomato seedlings cv. Reserve under greenhouse conditions (22 ± 5°C). Inoculation was performed by transferring conidia from infected leaves to the leaves of uninfected tomato seedlings with a single-edged razor blade. Powdery mildew symptoms began to develop 7 days after inoculation. Symptoms and morphological characteristics were similar to those observed in the commercial greenhouse. Noninoculated plants remained healthy throughout the experiments. To our knowledge, this is the first report of O. neolycopersici causing powdery mildew on tomato in Michoacan, Mexico. This disease has been reported from Canada, Europe, Japan, the United States (2), and Venezuela (3) on greenhouse and field tomato crops. The observed high incidence and severe infection indicates that this disease may become an important problem in greenhouse tomatoes in Mexico. References: (1) L. Kiss et al. Mycol. Res. 105:684, 2001. (2) L. Kiss et al. Plant Dis. 89:491, 2005. (3) J. O. Montilla et al. Plant Dis. 91:910, 2007.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Powdery mildew incidence on greenhouse tomato rose from 0.5% to more than 90% within a month.

Interactor
Oidium neolycopersiciErysiphe neolycopersicit0pathogen
Outcome
Disease incidencee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
more than 90%e0
Qualifier
0.5%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Disease incidence increased from 0.5% to more than 90% in 1 month.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 203–269 · show in text ↑
e1

“tomato (Lycopersicum esculentum Mill. cv. Reserve)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 54–104 · show in text ↑
t0

“Oidium neolycopersici”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–85 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The powdery mildew fungus on tomato was identified as Oidium neolycopersici from morphology.

Interactor
Oidium neolycopersiciErysiphe neolycopersicie0pathogen
Outcome
identified as Oidium neolycopersicie0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the fungus was identified as Oidium neolycopersici L. Kiss”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 740–798 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculated tomato seedlings developed powdery mildew symptoms after 7 days, whereas noninoculated plants stayed healthy.

Treatment
inoculatione0
Interactor
Oidium neolycopersiciErysiphe neolycopersicit0pathogen
Outcome
Powdery mildew symptomse0
Value
7 dayse0
Comparator
Noninoculated plantse2

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Powdery mildew symptoms began to develop 7 days after inoculation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1077–1143 · show in text ↑
e1

“tomato seedlings cv. Reserve”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 859–887 · show in text ↑
e2

“Noninoculated plants remained healthy throughout the experiments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1248–1313 · show in text ↑
t0

“Oidium neolycopersici”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–85 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

This is the first reported O. neolycopersici powdery mildew on tomato in Michoacan, Mexico.

Interactor
O. neolycopersiciErysiphe neolycopersicie0pathogen
Outcome
powdery mildewe0
Setting
Michoacan, Mexicoe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“this is the first report of O. neolycopersici causing powdery mildew on tomato in Michoacan, Mexico.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1332–1432 · show in text ↑

inoculation · Erysiphe neolycopersici · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.