Paper · 1957 · Agronomy Journal

Field Plot Technique With Hybrid Corn Under Alabama Conditions1

A. A. Fleming; T. Hayden Rogers; T. A. Bancroft

5
claims
8
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Synopsis Based on uniformity trial data from double‐cross corn in Alabama, plots 1 to 3 rows wide and 10 to 15 hills long (1 plant per hill) were the most efficient, disregarding relative costs. A plot 2 rows wide and 10 to 15 hills long was considered the optimum size for general use. A basic unit of more than 5 plants may be advantageous in future experiments with corn uniformity data. There was only a small decrease in L.S.D. by increasing the replications from 5 to 6. The small gain in precision did not justify the use of the simple lattice instead of the randomized blocks design with 16, 25, or 36 entries.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plots one to three rows wide and 10 to 15 hills long were most efficient.

Outcome
most efficiente0
Value
1 to 3 rows wide and 10 to 15 hills longe0
Setting
Alabamae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Based on uniformity trial data from double‐cross corn in Alabama, plots 1 to 3 rows wide and 10 to 15 hills long (1 plant per hill) were the most efficient, disregarding relative costs.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–194 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Two-row plots 10 to 15 hills long were considered optimal for general use.

Outcome
optimum size for general usee0
Value
2 rows wide and 10 to 15 hills longe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A plot 2 rows wide and 10 to 15 hills long was considered the optimum size for general use.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 195–286 · show in text ↑
t0

“Hybrid Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–37 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

A basic unit larger than five plants may be advantageous.

Outcome
more than 5 plants may be advantageouse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A basic unit of more than 5 plants may be advantageous in future experiments with corn uniformity data.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 287–390 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing replications from five to six gave only a small decrease in L.S.D.

Outcome
L.S.D.e0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
5 to 6e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was only a small decrease in L.S.D. by increasing the replications from 5 to 6.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 391–476 · show in text ↑
t0

“Hybrid Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–37 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The precision gain did not justify using simple lattice over randomized blocks.

Outcome
did not justify the use of the simple latticee0
Comparator
randomized blocks designe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The small gain in precision did not justify the use of the simple lattice instead of the randomized blocks design with 16, 25, or 36 entries.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 477–618 · show in text ↑
t0

“Hybrid Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–37 · show in text ↑