Paper · 2011 · 2011 International Symposium on Water Resource and Environmental Protection

Test study on water saving and environmental effects of rain-catching and controlled irrigation of rice

Guo Xiang-ping; Deng Fang-fang; Chen Zhu-ye

8
claims
21
verbatim quotes
2
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The following parameters were investigated in a two-year farm experiments with materials of hybrid rice cultivar “Kyou 818”, which were Rainfall use efficiency(RUE), irrigation and drainage quota, loss load of nitrogen and phosphorus, grain yield and irrigation water production efficiency(IWPE) under rain-catching and controlled irrigation(RCCI), continuous flooding irrigation (CFI) and shallow frequent irrigation(SFI). Comparative analysis results of different irrigation models were presented to study the water saving, labor saving and environmental effects of RCCI. Results showed that comparing with CFI and SFI without reduction of grain yield, RCCI increased RUE by 3%–12% while it reduced irrigation quota and drainage quota by 15%–32% and 13%–68% respectively. RCCI decreased both irrigation times and drainage frequency by 1-3times. In addition, the loss load of nitrogen and phosphorus from surface drainage water declined 24%–78% and 40%–80%, respectively. However, if the rain-catching depth was excessively high under RCCI, it would cause a small cut of grain yield by about 3%–6%. The results above indicated that RCCI had advantages of water-saving, labor-saving and environment—protecting and it was suitable for rainy regions in South China.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RCCI increased rainfall use efficiency of rice by 3%-12% compared with CFI and SFI without reducing grain yield.

Material
Kyou 818e0
Treatment
RCCIe2
Outcome
RUEe2
Direction
increasede2
Value
3%–12%e2
Qualifier
without reduction of grain yielde2
Comparator
CFI and SFIe2
Setting
two-year farm experimentse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“materials of hybrid rice cultivar “Kyou 818””

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 79–123 · show in text ↑
e1

“two-year farm experiments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 48–73 · show in text ↑
e2

“comparing with CFI and SFI without reduction of grain yield, RCCI increased RUE by 3%–12%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 594–683 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RCCI reduced irrigation quota of rice by 15%-32% compared with CFI and SFI.

Treatment
RCCIe2
Outcome
irrigation quotae1
Direction
reducede1
Value
15%–32%e1
Comparator
CFI and SFIe2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“materials of hybrid rice cultivar “Kyou 818””

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 79–123 · show in text ↑
e1

“it reduced irrigation quota and drainage quota by 15%–32% and 13%–68% respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 690–772 · show in text ↑
e2

“comparing with CFI and SFI without reduction of grain yield, RCCI increased RUE by 3%–12%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 594–683 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RCCI reduced drainage quota of rice by 13%-68% compared with CFI and SFI.

Treatment
RCCIe2
Outcome
drainage quotae1
Direction
reducede1
Value
13%–68%e1
Comparator
CFI and SFIe2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“materials of hybrid rice cultivar “Kyou 818””

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 79–123 · show in text ↑
e1

“it reduced irrigation quota and drainage quota by 15%–32% and 13%–68% respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 690–772 · show in text ↑
e2

“comparing with CFI and SFI without reduction of grain yield, RCCI increased RUE by 3%–12%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 594–683 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RCCI decreased irrigation times and drainage frequency of rice by 1-3 times.

Treatment
RCCIe1
Outcome
irrigation times and drainage frequencye1
Direction
decreasede1
Value
1-3timese1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“materials of hybrid rice cultivar “Kyou 818””

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 79–123 · show in text ↑
e1

“RCCI decreased both irrigation times and drainage frequency by 1-3times”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 774–845 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RCCI reduced the loss load of nitrogen from surface drainage water of rice by 24%-78%.

Treatment
RCCIe1
Outcome
loss load of nitrogene2
Direction
declinede2
Value
24%–78%e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“materials of hybrid rice cultivar “Kyou 818””

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 79–123 · show in text ↑
e1

“RCCI decreased both irrigation times and drainage frequency by 1-3times”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 774–845 · show in text ↑
e2

“the loss load of nitrogen and phosphorus from surface drainage water declined 24%–78% and 40%–80%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 860–971 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RCCI reduced the loss load of phosphorus from surface drainage water of rice by 40%-80%.

Treatment
RCCIe1
Outcome
loss load of nitrogen and phosphoruse2
Direction
declinede2
Value
40%–80%e2
Qualifier
phosphoruse2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“materials of hybrid rice cultivar “Kyou 818””

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 79–123 · show in text ↑
e1

“RCCI decreased both irrigation times and drainage frequency by 1-3times”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 774–845 · show in text ↑
e2

“the loss load of nitrogen and phosphorus from surface drainage water declined 24%–78% and 40%–80%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 860–971 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Excessively high rain-catching depth under RCCI cut rice grain yield by about 3%-6%.

Treatment
the rain-catching depth was excessively high under RCCIe1
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
cute1
Value
3%–6%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“materials of hybrid rice cultivar “Kyou 818””

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 79–123 · show in text ↑
e1

“if the rain-catching depth was excessively high under RCCI, it would cause a small cut of grain yield by about 3%–6%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 982–1098 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

RCCI is suitable for rainy regions in South China, with advantages of water saving, labor saving and environmental protection for rice.

Outcome
suitable for rainy regions in South Chinae1
Qualifier
water-saving, labor-saving and environment—protectinge1
Setting
rainy regions in South Chinae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“materials of hybrid rice cultivar “Kyou 818””

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 79–123 · show in text ↑
e1

“RCCI had advantages of water-saving, labor-saving and environment—protecting and it was suitable for rainy regions in South China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1133–1262 · show in text ↑

rainfall · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

26 papers: 15 positive, 11 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

rainfall · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

51 papers: 29 positive, 22 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 29 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

47 papers more in this group

See all 51 papers →

irrigation · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

291 papers: 222 positive, 69 negative or no effect

221 papers in the same direction as this paper · 62 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

287 papers more in this group

See all 291 papers →

irrigation · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

1,171 papers: 906 positive, 265 negative or no effect

264 papers in the same direction as this paper · 906 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1,167 papers more in this group

See all 1,171 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.