Paper · 2000 · Crop Science

Repeatability of Large‐Scale Germplasm Evaluation Results in Durum Wheat

Paolo Annicchiarico; Luciano Pecetti; Gaetano Boggini; et al.

9
claims
22
verbatim quotes
23
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Large‐scale trait evaluation may enhance the utilization of germplasm collections by breeders. However, there is concern that this information may not be repeatable outside the area of testing because of large genotype × location interaction. Our objective was to assess the repeatability of large‐scale evaluation results for durum wheat [ Triticum turgidum (L.) Thell. ssp. turgidum conv. durum (Desf.) MacKey] across two areas of the Mediterranean region. A subset of 600 entries from a world collection was evaluated for six agronomic traits at one site in northern Syria and one in Sicily. Pearson's and Spearman's rank correlations of entry values between locations indicated that the repeatability as measured by both coefficients was high for heading time ( r ≥ 0.73), moderately high for kernel weight and plant height (0.48 ≤ r ≤ 0.57), relatively low for grain yield and kernels per spike (0.18 ≤ r ≤ 0.30), and non‐significant for early vigor score. Comparison between phenotypic and genetic correlations suggested that not only genotype × location interactions but also experimental errors contributed substantially to departures from complete repeatability. When each location alternated as the selection site and the other as the test site, at least 50% of the advantage shown by the top 10% entries over the remaining accessions at the selection site could be maintained at the test location for early or late heading, high kernel weight, and short or tall stature, for which 30 to 57% of selected entries were common to both sites. At least 20% of the selection advantage was maintained for high kernels per spike and grain yield. The results support the potential usefulness of large‐scale germplasm evaluation trials for crop improvement.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Repeatability of entry values between the two locations was high for heading time (r ≥ 0.73).

Outcome
repeatabilitye1
Direction
highe1
Value
r ≥ 0.73e1
Qualifier
for heading timee1
Setting
one site in northern Syria and one in Sicilye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Durum Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–72 · show in text ↑
e1

“the repeatability as measured by both coefficients was high for heading time ( r ≥ 0.73), moderately high for kernel weight and plant height (0.48 ≤ r ≤ 0.57), relatively low for grain yield and kernels per spike (0.18 ≤ r ≤ 0.30), and non‐significant for early vigor score”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 687–960 · show in text ↑
e0

“A subset of 600 entries from a world collection was evaluated for six agronomic traits at one site in northern Syria and one in Sicily”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 459–593 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Repeatability of entry values between the two locations was moderately high for kernel weight and plant height (0.48 ≤ r ≤ 0.57).

Outcome
repeatabilitye1
Direction
moderately highe1
Value
0.48 ≤ r ≤ 0.57e1
Qualifier
for kernel weight and plant heighte1
Setting
one site in northern Syria and one in Sicilye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Durum Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–72 · show in text ↑
e1

“the repeatability as measured by both coefficients was high for heading time ( r ≥ 0.73), moderately high for kernel weight and plant height (0.48 ≤ r ≤ 0.57), relatively low for grain yield and kernels per spike (0.18 ≤ r ≤ 0.30), and non‐significant for early vigor score”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 687–960 · show in text ↑
e0

“A subset of 600 entries from a world collection was evaluated for six agronomic traits at one site in northern Syria and one in Sicily”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 459–593 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Repeatability of entry values between the two locations was relatively low for grain yield and kernels per spike (0.18 ≤ r ≤ 0.30).

Outcome
repeatabilitye1
Direction
relatively lowe1
Value
0.18 ≤ r ≤ 0.30e1
Qualifier
for grain yield and kernels per spikee1
Setting
one site in northern Syria and one in Sicilye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Durum Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–72 · show in text ↑
e1

“the repeatability as measured by both coefficients was high for heading time ( r ≥ 0.73), moderately high for kernel weight and plant height (0.48 ≤ r ≤ 0.57), relatively low for grain yield and kernels per spike (0.18 ≤ r ≤ 0.30), and non‐significant for early vigor score”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 687–960 · show in text ↑
e0

“A subset of 600 entries from a world collection was evaluated for six agronomic traits at one site in northern Syria and one in Sicily”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 459–593 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Repeatability of entry values between the two locations for early vigor score was not significant.

Outcome
repeatabilitye1
Qualifier
for early vigor scoree1
Setting
one site in northern Syria and one in Sicilye0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Durum Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–72 · show in text ↑
e1

“the repeatability as measured by both coefficients was high for heading time ( r ≥ 0.73), moderately high for kernel weight and plant height (0.48 ≤ r ≤ 0.57), relatively low for grain yield and kernels per spike (0.18 ≤ r ≤ 0.30), and non‐significant for early vigor score”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 687–960 · show in text ↑
e0

“A subset of 600 entries from a world collection was evaluated for six agronomic traits at one site in northern Syria and one in Sicily”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 459–593 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Comparison of phenotypic and genetic correlations suggests that genotype × location interaction and experimental error both contribute substantially to departures from complete repeatability.

Outcome
departures from complete repeatabilitye5
Qualifier
not only genotype × location interactions but also experimental errorse5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Durum Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–72 · show in text ↑
e5

“Comparison between phenotypic and genetic correlations suggested that not only genotype × location interactions but also experimental errors contributed substantially to departures from complete repeatability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 962–1170 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

When each location served as selection site and the other as test site, at least 50% of the selection advantage of the top 10% entries was maintained at the test location for early or late heading, high kernel weight, and short or tall stature.

Outcome
the advantage shown by the top 10% entriese6
Value
at least 50%e6
Qualifier
for early or late heading, high kernel weight, and short or tall staturee6
Comparator
remaining accessionse6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Durum Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–72 · show in text ↑
e6

“at least 50% of the advantage shown by the top 10% entries over the remaining accessions at the selection site could be maintained at the test location for early or late heading, high kernel weight, and short or tall stature”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1256–1480 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

For early or late heading, high kernel weight, and short or tall stature, 30 to 57% of selected entries were common to both sites.

Outcome
selected entriese7
Value
30 to 57%e7
Qualifier
for early or late heading, high kernel weight, and short or tall staturee7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Durum Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–72 · show in text ↑
e7

“for early or late heading, high kernel weight, and short or tall stature, for which 30 to 57% of selected entries were common to both sites”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1408–1547 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At least 20% of the selection advantage was maintained at the test location for high kernels per spike and grain yield.

Outcome
selection advantagee1
Value
At least 20%e1
Qualifier
for high kernels per spike and grain yielde1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Durum Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–72 · show in text ↑
e1

“At least 20% of the selection advantage was maintained for high kernels per spike and grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1549–1646 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The results support the potential usefulness of large-scale germplasm evaluation trials for crop improvement.

Outcome
potential usefulnesse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Durum Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–72 · show in text ↑
e1

“The results support the potential usefulness of large‐scale germplasm evaluation trials for crop improvement”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1648–1756 · show in text ↑