Paper · 1996 · Crop Science

Leaf Rust Resistance Gene Lr9 and Winter Wheat Yield Reduction: I. Yield and Yield Components

Silvano Ortelli; Hans Winzeler; Michael Winzeler; et al.

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
35
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Leaf rust ( Puccinia recondita Rob. ex Desm. f. sp. tritici ) resistant near isogenic lines (NIL) of wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) have generally lower yields than the susceptible recurrent parent under disease free conditions. Analysis of growth and yield should increase our understanding of the reduced yielding ability of NIL. In a 3‐yr field study, the yield components of the leaf rust susceptible cultivar Arina were compared with six resistant NIL carrying the resistance gene Lr9 introduced from Aegilops umbellulata . The NIL were derived from two independently developed backcross populations with Arina as the recurrent parent. The NIL were phenotypicaily very similar to Arina. At anthesis and at mediumilk stage, the total aboveground dry matter was similar for the NIL and Arina. Differences in the dry matter accumulation appeared only after the medium milk stage. At maturity, the NIL had a 12% lower grain yield than Arina (5.88 ha −1 ) with a range from 5 to 14%. The lower grain yield resulted from a 3 to 11% reduction in grain number per square meter and a 2 to 7% reduction in mean grain weight. The smaller grain number per square meter was the result of a 6% smaller tiller number per plant and a 2% smaller grain number per ear. Artificially reducing grain number per ear suggested that both a reduced supply of assimilates and a diminished capacity to incorporate assimilates in the grain caused the reduced grain yield of the NIL. Deleterious effects of alien genes linked with the Lr9 gene from Aegilops umbellulata cannot be ruled out. However, the small differences within and between the NIL of the two Lr9 populations for the parameters tested suggest a direct relation between the yield depression and the leaf rust resistance conferred by the Lr9 gene.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The Lr9 near isogenic lines were phenotypically very similar to Arina.

Material
NILe0
Outcome
phenotypicaily very similare0
Comparator
Arinae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The NIL were phenotypicaily very similar to Arina.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 640–690 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–46 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aboveground dry matter was similar for the near isogenic lines and Arina at anthesis and medium milk stage.

Material
NILe0
Organ / stage
anthesis and at mediumilk stagee0
Outcome
total aboveground dry mattere0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
Arinae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At anthesis and at mediumilk stage, the total aboveground dry matter was similar for the NIL and Arina.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 691–794 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–46 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry matter accumulation diverged only after the medium milk stage.

Outcome
dry matter accumulatione0
Direction
Differencese0
Qualifier
only after the medium milk stagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Differences in the dry matter accumulation appeared only after the medium milk stage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 795–880 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–46 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At maturity, the near isogenic lines yielded 12% less grain than Arina, with a 5 to 14% range.

Material
NILe0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
lowere0
Value
12%e0
Qualifier
range from 5 to 14%e0
Comparator
Arinae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At maturity, the NIL had a 12% lower grain yield than Arina (5.88 ha −1 ) with a range from 5 to 14%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 881–982 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–46 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The near isogenic lines had 3 to 11% fewer grains per square meter.

Outcome
grain number per square metere0
Direction
reductione0
Value
3 to 11%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The lower grain yield resulted from a 3 to 11% reduction in grain number per square meter and a 2 to 7% reduction in mean grain weight.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 983–1118 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–46 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The near isogenic lines had 2 to 7% lower mean grain weight.

Outcome
mean grain weighte0
Direction
reductione0
Value
2 to 7%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The lower grain yield resulted from a 3 to 11% reduction in grain number per square meter and a 2 to 7% reduction in mean grain weight.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 983–1118 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–46 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The smaller grain number was associated with 6% fewer tillers per plant.

Outcome
tiller number per plante0
Direction
smallere0
Value
6%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The smaller grain number per square meter was the result of a 6% smaller tiller number per plant and a 2% smaller grain number per ear.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1119–1254 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–46 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The smaller grain number was associated with 2% fewer grains per ear.

Outcome
grain number per eare0
Direction
smallere0
Value
2%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The smaller grain number per square meter was the result of a 6% smaller tiller number per plant and a 2% smaller grain number per ear.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1119–1254 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–46 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reducing grains per ear suggested that reduced assimilate supply contributes to lower yield in the near isogenic lines.

Treatment
Artificially reducing grain number per eare0
Outcome
reduced grain yielde0
Qualifier
reduced supply of assimilatese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Artificially reducing grain number per ear suggested that both a reduced supply of assimilates and a diminished capacity to incorporate assimilates in the grain caused the reduced grain yield of the NIL.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1255–1458 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–46 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reducing grains per ear suggested that diminished capacity to incorporate assimilates in grain contributes to lower yield.

Treatment
Artificially reducing grain number per eare0
Outcome
reduced grain yielde0
Qualifier
diminished capacity to incorporate assimilates in the graine0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Artificially reducing grain number per ear suggested that both a reduced supply of assimilates and a diminished capacity to incorporate assimilates in the grain caused the reduced grain yield of the NIL.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1255–1458 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–46 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Small differences among Lr9 lines suggested a direct relationship between yield depression and Lr9 resistance.

Material
NILe0
Gene
Lr9 genee0
Outcome
yield depressione0
Qualifier
suggest a direct relatione0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the small differences within and between the NIL of the two Lr9 populations for the parameters tested suggest a direct relation between the yield depression and the leaf rust resistance conferred by the Lr9 gene.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1575–1787 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–46 · show in text ↑