Paper · 1982 · Crop Science

Intergenotypic Competition and Competition with Associated Crops in Cassava1

Kazuo Kawano; Michael D. Thung

12
claims
19
verbatim quotes
34
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The competitive ability (defined as root yield in mixture/root yield in monoculture) of Cassava ( Manihot esculenta Crantz) genotypes in monoculture, mixed populations and in multiple cropping systems was studied in the field. Strong competitors produced more roots and stems in genotypic mixtures than in monoculture and did so at the expense of weak competitors. Competitive ability was positively correlated with spacing response and stem and leaf‐weight at harvest, but negatively correlated with harvest index (proportion of root weight to total plant weight) and root yield in monoculture. Because of the negative correlation of competitive ability with root yield in monoculture, improvement in the productivity of cassava cultivars will likely occur through improvements in plant efficiency and at the expense of competitive ability. It is therefore recommended that in selecting high yielding genotypes potentially adapted to productive environments, strong competitors should be eliminated from segregating populations. Modest yield reductions (9 to 13%) occured when cassava was planted in association with beans ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.) or soybeans [ Glycine max (L.) Merrill]. Beans, planted in association with cassava, had non‐significant reductions in yields whereas yields of soybeans were severely reduced. Yields of beans and soybeans were negatively correlated with vegetative vigor of the associated cassava genotype, but were not correlated with yield or intergenotypic competitive ability of the cassava genotype. Cassava can be planted in association with short‐duration crops without sacrificing much in the yields of either crop. High‐yielding cassava genotypes with low vegetative vigor would bring about high combined yields of cassava and the associated crop.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Associationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Strong cassava competitors produced more roots and stems in genotype mixtures than monoculture, at the expense of weak competitors.

Material
Strong competitorse0
Outcome
more roots and stemse0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
monoculturee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Strong competitors produced more roots and stems in genotypic mixtures than in monoculture and did so at the expense of weak competitors.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 227–364 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cassava”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–75 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Competitive ability correlated positively with spacing response and stem and leaf weight at harvest.

Outcome
Competitive abilitye0
Direction
positively correlatede0
Comparator
spacing response and stem and leaf‐weight at harveste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Competitive ability was positively correlated with spacing response and stem and leaf‐weight at harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 365–468 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cassava”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–75 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Competitive ability correlated negatively with harvest index and monoculture root yield.

Outcome
harvest index (proportion of root weight to total plant weight) and root yield in monoculturee0
Direction
negatively correlatede0
Comparator
harvest indexe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“negatively correlated with harvest index (proportion of root weight to total plant weight) and root yield in monoculture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 474–594 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cassava”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cassava yield declined modestly by 9 to 13% with bean association.

Treatment
planted in association with beanse0
Interactor
beanse0weed
Outcome
yield reductionse0
Direction
reductionse0
Value
9 to 13%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Modest yield reductions (9 to 13%) occured when cassava was planted in association with beans ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1030–1148 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cassava”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cassava yield declined modestly by 9 to 13% with soybean association.

Treatment
soybeanse0
Interactor
soybeansGlycine maxe0weed
Outcome
yield reductionse0
Direction
reductionse0
Value
9 to 13%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Glycine max
Glycine max · InteractorPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Modest yield reductions (9 to 13%) occured when cassava was planted in association with beans ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.) or soybeans [ Glycine max (L.) Merrill]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1030–1188 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cassava”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bean yield reductions with cassava were nonsignificant.

Taxon
Beanse0
Treatment
planted in association with cassavae0
Interactor
cassavaManihot esculentae0weed
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
reductionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Interactor葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Beans, planted in association with cassava, had non‐significant reductions in yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1190–1274 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soybean yields were severely reduced with cassava.

Taxon
soybeansGlycine maxe0
Treatment
association with cassavae0
Interactor
cassavaManihot esculentae0weed
Outcome
yields of soybeanse0
Direction
severely reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Interactor葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Beans, planted in association with cassava, had non‐significant reductions in yields whereas yields of soybeans were severely reduced.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1190–1324 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bean and soybean yields correlated negatively with vegetative vigor of associated cassava.

Taxon
beans and soybeanse0
Interactor
cassavaManihot esculentae0weed
Outcome
Yields of beans and soybeanse0
Direction
negatively correlatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Interactor葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yields of beans and soybeans were negatively correlated with vegetative vigor of the associated cassava genotype”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1325–1437 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bean and soybean yields did not correlate with cassava yield or intergenotypic competitive ability.

Taxon
beans and soybeanse1
Interactor
cassavaManihot esculentae0weed
Outcome
Yields of beans and soybeanse1
Direction
not correlatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Interactor葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“were not correlated with yield or intergenotypic competitive ability of the cassava genotype”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1443–1535 · show in text ↑
e1

“Yields of beans and soybeans were negatively correlated with vegetative vigor of the associated cassava genotype”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1325–1437 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors recommend eliminating strong competitors when selecting high yielding genotypes.

Outcome
strong competitors should be eliminated from segregating populationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in selecting high yielding genotypes potentially adapted to productive environments, strong competitors should be eliminated from segregating populations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 875–1028 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cassava”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–75 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors conclude cassava can be associated with short duration crops with little yield sacrifice.

Outcome
planted in association with short‐duration crops without sacrificing much in the yields of either crope0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cassava can be planted in association with short‐duration crops without sacrificing much in the yields of either crop.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1537–1655 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

High yielding cassava genotypes with low vegetative vigor are proposed to raise combined yields.

Outcome
high combined yields of cassava and the associated crope0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“High‐yielding cassava genotypes with low vegetative vigor would bring about high combined yields of cassava and the associated crop.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1656–1788 · show in text ↑

Manihot esculenta · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

Manihot esculenta · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
See all 3 papers →

Glycine max · yield · Manihot esculenta (cassava)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 5 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.