Paper · 2003 · Agronomy Journal

Spatial Yield Response of Two Corn Hybrids at Two Nitrogen Levels

Tawainga W. Katsvairo; William J. Cox; Harold M. Van Es; et al.

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
35
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The challenge for variable N rate management is to identify specific field areas that respond to specific N levels. We evaluated two corn ( Zea mays L.) hybrids at two N rates (110–130 vs. 165–185 kg ha −1 at three sites and manure vs. manure + 55 kg ha −1 at two sites) to determine if corn responded differently to N and hybrids within fields. Spatial yield variability existed at all sites in dry years (1999 and 2001) but at only two sites in a wet year (2000). Spatial yield difference variability in response to N existed at only two of 13 site–year comparisons. Although late‐spring soil NO 3 –N concentrations in the upper 30 cm were <25 mg kg −1 on 15 to 25% of the manured fields in the wet year, spatial yield difference variability in response to N did not exist. At a nonmanured site, spatial yield difference variability in response to N existed with temporal yield stability across dry years ( r = 0.96). Surprisingly, corn responded to the higher N rate on 25% of this field where yields were least, but not where yields were greatest. Apparently, variable N rate management of corn requires more information than soil NO 3 –N concentrations and yield maps. Spatial yield difference variability between hybrids existed at only four of 15 site–year comparisons, despite hybrid interactions with sites. Adoption of variable hybrid selection is unlikely if hybrids that show interactions with sites do not show spatial yield difference variability within sites.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spatial yield variability existed at all sites in dry years (1999 and 2001).

Outcome
spatial yield variabilitye1
Qualifier
at all sites in dry years (1999 and 2001)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“We evaluated two corn ( Zea mays L.) hybrids at two N rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 116–175 · show in text ↑
e1

“Spatial yield variability existed at all sites in dry years (1999 and 2001) but at only two sites in a wet year (2000)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 346–464 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spatial yield variability existed at only two sites in a wet year (2000).

Outcome
spatial yield variabilitye1
Value
only two sitese1
Qualifier
in a wet year (2000)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“We evaluated two corn ( Zea mays L.) hybrids at two N rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 116–175 · show in text ↑
e1

“Spatial yield variability existed at all sites in dry years (1999 and 2001) but at only two sites in a wet year (2000)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 346–464 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spatial yield difference variability in response to N existed at two of 13 site–year comparisons.

Outcome
spatial yield difference variability in response to Ne2
Value
two of 13 site–year comparisonse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“We evaluated two corn ( Zea mays L.) hybrids at two N rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 116–175 · show in text ↑
e2

“Spatial yield difference variability in response to N existed at only two of 13 site–year comparisons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 466–567 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At a nonmanured site, temporal yield stability across dry years was associated with spatial yield difference variability in response to N (r = 0.96).

Outcome
temporal yield stability across dry yearse4
Value
r = 0.96e4
Qualifier
At a nonmanured sitee4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“We evaluated two corn ( Zea mays L.) hybrids at two N rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 116–175 · show in text ↑
e4

“At a nonmanured site, spatial yield difference variability in response to N existed with temporal yield stability across dry years ( r = 0.96)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 776–918 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn responded to the higher N rate on 25% of a field where yields were least, but not where yields were greatest.

Treatment
higher N ratee5
Outcome
responded to the higher N ratee5
Value
25%e5
Qualifier
where yields were leaste5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“We evaluated two corn ( Zea mays L.) hybrids at two N rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 116–175 · show in text ↑
e5

“Surprisingly, corn responded to the higher N rate on 25% of this field where yields were least, but not where yields were greatest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 920–1050 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spatial yield difference variability between hybrids existed at four of 15 site–year comparisons.

Outcome
spatial yield difference variability between hybridse6
Value
four of 15 site–year comparisonse6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“We evaluated two corn ( Zea mays L.) hybrids at two N rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 116–175 · show in text ↑
e6

“Spatial yield difference variability between hybrids existed at only four of 15 site–year comparisons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1174–1275 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spatial yield difference variability in response to N did not exist in the wet year on manured fields.

Outcome
spatial yield difference variability in response to Ne3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“We evaluated two corn ( Zea mays L.) hybrids at two N rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 116–175 · show in text ↑
e3

“spatial yield difference variability in response to N did not exist”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 707–774 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil NO3-N concentrations in the upper 30 cm were below 25 mg/kg on some manured fields in the wet year.

Outcome
soil NO 3 –N concentrationse7
Value
<25 mg kg −1e7
Qualifier
in the wet yeare7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“We evaluated two corn ( Zea mays L.) hybrids at two N rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 116–175 · show in text ↑
e7

“soil NO 3 –N concentrations in the upper 30 cm were <25 mg kg −1 on 15 to 25% of the manured fields in the wet year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 590–705 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Variable N rate management of corn requires more information than soil NO3-N concentrations and yield maps.

Outcome
variable N rate managemente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“We evaluated two corn ( Zea mays L.) hybrids at two N rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 116–175 · show in text ↑
e1

“Apparently, variable N rate management of corn requires more information than soil NO 3 –N concentrations and yield maps”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1052–1172 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Adoption of variable hybrid selection is unlikely when hybrids interact with sites but show no spatial yield difference variability within sites.

Outcome
variable hybrid selectione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“We evaluated two corn ( Zea mays L.) hybrids at two N rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 116–175 · show in text ↑
e1

“Adoption of variable hybrid selection is unlikely if hybrids that show interactions with sites do not show spatial yield difference variability within sites”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1317–1473 · show in text ↑