Paper · 2001 · Annals of Applied Biology

Discrimination amongst Alliums using an electronic nose

L ABBEY; J AKED; D C JOYCE

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
35
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Summary Pyruvic acid content determination and, to lesser extents, thiosulphinates determination and organoleptic tests are used for assessing the eating characteristics of onions and other Allium spp. Each of these methods has inherent limitations, especially when large numbers of samples are to be evaluated. With a view to developing a more convenient quality evaluation method, an electronic nose was used to discriminate flavour and aroma characteristics amongst garlic, leek, shallot, bulb onion and spring onion. Differences in relative sensor response to headspace volatiles over macerated samples of these five different Allium types were recorded. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) showed some separation among the five types. PCA and Mahalanobis' D 2 statistic suggested similarities in headspace volatiles for shallot, spring and bulb onions and differences for leek and, especially, garlic. Multiple linear regression analyses (Y =α+β 1 X 1 +β 1 X 2 ; N (x, Y) =5) of the first two principal component values (PCA 1 [X 1 ] and PCA 2 [X 2 ]) accounted for not less than 90% of the total variation in pyruvic acid concentration (Y1), total soluble solids content (Y2) and percentage dry matter content (Y3) of the Allium types. These relationships suggest that electronic nose discrimination was on the basis of quality characteristics that relate to Allium flavour. This work has shown that the electronic nose has potential for flavour characteristic‐based discrimination amongst Allium types. Future work will explore this potential within a single Allium spp.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sensor responses to headspace volatiles differed among five Allium types.

Taxon
Allium typese0
Outcome
relative sensor response to headspace volatilese0
Direction
Differencese0

Verbatim

e0

“Differences in relative sensor response to headspace volatiles over macerated samples of these five different Allium types were recorded”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 521–657 · show in text ↑
t0

“Alliums”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–30 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PCA showed some separation among the five Allium types.

Taxon
AlliumsAlliumt0
Outcome
separation among the five typese0
Comparator
five typese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium
Allium · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Didier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Principal Component Analysis (PCA) showed some separation among the five types”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 659–737 · show in text ↑
t0

“Alliums”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–30 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PCA and Mahalanobis statistic suggested similar headspace volatiles for shallot, spring and bulb onions.

Taxon
shallot, spring and bulb onionse0
Outcome
similarities in headspace volatilese0
Comparator
shallot, spring and bulb onionse0

Verbatim

e0

“PCA and Mahalanobis' D 2 statistic suggested similarities in headspace volatiles for shallot, spring and bulb onions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 739–855 · show in text ↑
t0

“Alliums”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–30 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PCA and Mahalanobis statistic suggested different headspace volatiles for leek and garlic.

Taxon
leek and, especially, garlice0
Outcome
differencese0
Comparator
leek and, especially, garlice0

Verbatim

e0

“differences for leek and, especially, garlic”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 860–904 · show in text ↑
t0

“Alliums”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–30 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

First two principal components explained at least 90% of variation in pyruvic acid concentration.

Taxon
Allium typese0
Material
Allium typese0
Outcome
total variation in pyruvic acid concentratione0
Value
not less than 90%e0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“accounted for not less than 90% of the total variation in pyruvic acid concentration (Y1), total soluble solids content (Y2) and percentage dry matter content (Y3) of the Allium types”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1056–1239 · show in text ↑
t0

“Alliums”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–30 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

First two principal components explained at least 90% of variation in total soluble solids content.

Taxon
Allium typese0
Material
Allium typese0
Outcome
total soluble solids contente0
Value
not less than 90%e0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“accounted for not less than 90% of the total variation in pyruvic acid concentration (Y1), total soluble solids content (Y2) and percentage dry matter content (Y3) of the Allium types”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1056–1239 · show in text ↑
t0

“Alliums”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–30 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

First two principal components explained at least 90% of variation in dry matter percentage.

Taxon
Allium typese0
Material
Allium typese0
Outcome
percentage dry matter contente0
Value
not less than 90%e0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“accounted for not less than 90% of the total variation in pyruvic acid concentration (Y1), total soluble solids content (Y2) and percentage dry matter content (Y3) of the Allium types”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1056–1239 · show in text ↑
t0

“Alliums”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–30 · show in text ↑