Paper · 2011 · Fire Ecology

Post-Fire Growth Strategies of Resprouting Florida Scrub Vegetation

Andrea J. Maguire; Eric S. Menges

6
claims
10
verbatim quotes
35
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Although resprouting is recognized as a key post-disturbance response for plants, few studies have closely examined post-fire growth responses of resprouting species. Following a prescribed burn in Florida scrub, we compared intraspecific and interspecific growth patterns of 16 resprouting shrub species. We then examined how resprouting growth is related to species life history strategies to understand how the resprouting response could contribute to niche differentiation and species coexistence. We defined growth by calculating relative growth rates based on height, crown area, and crown volume of resprouts. In addition, we measured the number, diameter, and height of all resprouting stems. The number and diameter of all stems present before fire were also estimated. The number of resprouting stems after the fire was higher than the number of stems present before the fire for all species. As expected, species varied significantly in their post-fire growth rates, especially between those with differing recovery modes. Resprouting shrubs that are also post-fire seeders had the lowest growth rates compared to those that resprout and grow clonally, those that only resprout, and palmettos. We also found differences in post-fire growth among species with different growth forms, with palmettos having the fastest growth, followed by shrubs, and then by sub-shrubs. Within species, tradeoffs were found between height and the density of new stems, but not between height and diameter of re-sprouting stems. Overall, Florida scrub species exhibit a continuum of post-fire growth rates, suggesting the coexistence of a number of successful strategies for post-fire re-sprouting rather than a single optimal recovery strategy.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stem counts after fire exceeded prefire counts for all species.

Taxon
Florida Scrub Vegetationt0
Outcome
number of resprouting stemse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
number of stems present before the firee0

Verbatim

e0

“The number of resprouting stems after the fire was higher than the number of stems present before the fire for all species.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 779–902 · show in text ↑
t0

“Florida Scrub Vegetation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–67 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Species differed significantly in post-fire growth rates.

Taxon
Florida Scrub Vegetationt0
Outcome
post-fire growth ratese0
Direction
variede0
Qualifier
differing recovery modese0

Verbatim

e0

“species varied significantly in their post-fire growth rates, especially between those with differing recovery modes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 916–1033 · show in text ↑
t0

“Florida Scrub Vegetation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–67 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Resprouting shrubs that also seed had the lowest growth rates.

Taxon
Resprouting shrubse0
Outcome
growth ratese0
Direction
loweste0
Comparator
those that resprout and grow clonally, those that only resprout, and palmettose0

Verbatim

e0

“Resprouting shrubs that are also post-fire seeders had the lowest growth rates compared to those that resprout and grow clonally, those that only resprout, and palmettos.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1034–1204 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Palmettos grew fastest, followed by shrubs then sub-shrubs.

Taxon
palmettosSabale0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
fasteste0
Comparator
shrubs, and then by sub-shrubse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sabal
Sabal · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)William Bumgarner (en.wp:Zsinj) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“palmettos having the fastest growth, followed by shrubs, and then by sub-shrubs.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1299–1379 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Within species, stem height traded off with new-stem density.

Taxon
Florida Scrub Vegetationt0
Organ / stage
stemse0
Outcome
height and the density of new stemse0
Direction
tradeoffse0

Verbatim

e0

“Within species, tradeoffs were found between height and the density of new stems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1380–1460 · show in text ↑
t0

“Florida Scrub Vegetation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–67 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Within species, height did not trade off with resprouting stem diameter.

Taxon
Florida Scrub Vegetationt0
Organ / stage
stemse0
Outcome
height and diameter of re-sprouting stemse0
Direction
note0

Verbatim

e0

“but not between height and diameter of re-sprouting stems.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1462–1520 · show in text ↑
t0

“Florida Scrub Vegetation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–67 · show in text ↑