Paper · 2015 · American Journal of Plant Sciences

Effect of Water Stress on the Growth and Yield of Cotton Crop (Gossypium hirsutum L.)

Arbab Sahito; Zulfiqar Ali Baloch; Amanullah Mahar; et al.

11
claims
11
verbatim quotes
33
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Cotton is one of the most important fibre crops playing a key role in economic and social affairs of the world. Water is a critical factor which influences on growth and yield of the cotton crop. Scarcity of water has put tremendous pressure on scientists to introduce drought tolerant cotton varieties. This study was aimed to determine water stress effects on the growth and yield of cotton. The present study was carried out to examine the effect of number of irrigations on the growth and yield of cotton during 2014. The field trial was conducted at the Experimental Fields of Agronomy Section, Agriculture Research Institute, Tandojam, Pakistan. A three replicated Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) was employed to layout the experiment having plot size of 2.5 m × 5 m (12.5 m2). Four cotton varieties i.e. NIAB-78, Shahbaz-95, Sindh-1 and TH-224/87 were chosen for this study based on their frequent farmer usage. All the agronomic practices were performed according to standard procedures. Results showed that all the growth and yield components of cotton were significantly (P 0.05) affected by irrigation frequencies. The cotton crop irrigated six times at 21 days interval showed better results with 138.16 cm plant height, 1.45 monopodial branches per plant, 21.83 sympodial branches per plant, 44.58 bolls per plant, 33.86% G.O.T., and 26.97 mm staple length, 149.84 g seed cotton yield per plant and 2271.16 kg·ha-1 seed cotton yield. This study concluded that variety NIAB-78 showed superiority over Shahbaz-95, Sindh-1 and TH-224/87 in almost all the characters of economic importance, and the cotton crop received 6 irrigations at 21 days interval resulted in significantly economical overall performance as compared with 5 irrigations or 4 irrigations with higher seed cotton yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation frequency significantly affected cotton growth and yield components.

Treatment
irrigation frequenciese0
Outcome
growth and yield componentse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“all the growth and yield components of cotton were significantly (P 0.05) affected by irrigation frequencies”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1024–1132 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Six irrigations at 21-day intervals gave 138.16 cm plant height.

Treatment
irrigated six times at 21 days intervale0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
bettere0
Value
138.16 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The cotton crop irrigated six times at 21 days interval showed better results with 138.16 cm plant height”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1134–1239 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Six irrigations gave 1.45 monopodial branches per plant.

Treatment
irrigated six times at 21 days intervale0
Outcome
monopodial branches per plante0
Direction
bettere0
Value
1.45 monopodial branches per plante0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The cotton crop irrigated six times at 21 days interval showed better results with 138.16 cm plant height, 1.45 monopodial branches per plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1134–1275 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Six irrigations gave 21.83 sympodial branches per plant.

Treatment
irrigated six times at 21 days intervale0
Outcome
sympodial branches per plante0
Direction
bettere0
Value
21.83 sympodial branches per plante0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The cotton crop irrigated six times at 21 days interval showed better results with 138.16 cm plant height, 1.45 monopodial branches per plant, 21.83 sympodial branches per plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1134–1311 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Six irrigations gave 44.58 bolls per plant.

Treatment
irrigated six times at 21 days intervale0
Outcome
bolls per plante0
Direction
bettere0
Value
44.58 bolls per plante0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The cotton crop irrigated six times at 21 days interval showed better results with 138.16 cm plant height, 1.45 monopodial branches per plant, 21.83 sympodial branches per plant, 44.58 bolls per plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1134–1334 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Six irrigations gave 33.86% G.O.T.

Treatment
irrigated six times at 21 days intervale0
Outcome
G.O.T.e0
Direction
bettere0
Value
33.86%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The cotton crop irrigated six times at 21 days interval showed better results with 138.16 cm plant height, 1.45 monopodial branches per plant, 21.83 sympodial branches per plant, 44.58 bolls per plant, 33.86% G.O.T.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1134–1349 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Six irrigations gave 26.97 mm staple length.

Treatment
irrigated six times at 21 days intervale0
Outcome
staple lengthe0
Direction
bettere0
Value
26.97 mme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The cotton crop irrigated six times at 21 days interval showed better results with 138.16 cm plant height, 1.45 monopodial branches per plant, 21.83 sympodial branches per plant, 44.58 bolls per plant, 33.86% G.O.T., and 26.97 mm staple length”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1134–1377 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Six irrigations gave 149.84 g seed cotton yield per plant.

Treatment
irrigated six times at 21 days intervale0
Outcome
seed cotton yield per plante0
Direction
bettere0
Value
149.84 ge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The cotton crop irrigated six times at 21 days interval showed better results with 138.16 cm plant height, 1.45 monopodial branches per plant, 21.83 sympodial branches per plant, 44.58 bolls per plant, 33.86% G.O.T., and 26.97 mm staple length, 149.84 g seed cotton yield per plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1134–1415 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Six irrigations gave 2271.16 kg·ha-1 seed cotton yield.

Treatment
irrigated six times at 21 days intervale0
Outcome
seed cotton yielde0
Direction
bettere0
Value
2271.16 kg·ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The cotton crop irrigated six times at 21 days interval showed better results with 138.16 cm plant height, 1.45 monopodial branches per plant, 21.83 sympodial branches per plant, 44.58 bolls per plant, 33.86% G.O.T., and 26.97 mm staple length, 149.84 g seed cotton yield per plant and 2271.16 kg·ha-1 seed cotton yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1134–1453 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NIAB-78 surpassed the other three varieties in nearly all economic traits.

Material
NIAB-78e0
Outcome
characters of economic importancee0
Direction
superioritye0
Comparator
Shahbaz-95, Sindh-1 and TH-224/87e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“variety NIAB-78 showed superiority over Shahbaz-95, Sindh-1 and TH-224/87 in almost all the characters of economic importance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1481–1606 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Six irrigations at 21-day intervals gave better economic performance and seed cotton yield than four or five irrigations.

Treatment
6 irrigations at 21 days intervale0
Outcome
seed cotton yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
5 irrigations or 4 irrigationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the cotton crop received 6 irrigations at 21 days interval resulted in significantly economical overall performance as compared with 5 irrigations or 4 irrigations with higher seed cotton yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1612–1805 · show in text ↑

irrigation · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

144 papers: 101 positive, 43 negative or no effect

100 papers in the same direction as this paper · 40 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

140 papers more in this group

See all 144 papers →

irrigation · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

399 papers: 304 positive, 95 negative or no effect

303 papers in the same direction as this paper · 86 in the opposite direction · 9 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

395 papers more in this group

See all 399 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.