Paper · 2014 · Legume Research - An International Journal

Influence of intercropping, moisture conservation practice and P and S levels on growth, nodulation and yield of chickpea (Cicer arietinumL.) under rainfed condition

B. Lal; K.S. Rana; D.S. Rana; et al.

5
claims
9
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted to study the effect of intercropping system, moisture conservation practices and P and S levels on nodulation and productivity of chickpea under rainfed condition on a sandy loam soil at Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, during 2008–09 and 2009–10. The treatments comprised of 3 cropping systems (Ethiopian mustard sole, chickpea sole and Ethiopian mustard + Chickpea (1:4) and 2 moisture conservation practices including (control and FYM@ 5t/ha + organic mulch + kaolin 6% spray) as main plot and 5 fertility levels (control, 30 kgP2O5/ha, 30kgP2O5/ha+ 15kgS/ha, 60kgP2O5/ha and 60kgP2O5+ 30kgS/ha) as sub-plot replicated thrice in a split-plot design. Sole chickpea gave significantly higher yield however, yield attributes and quality parameters were not influenced by intercropping system. P and S application influenced significantly the growth attributes, nodulation, leghaemoglobin content, nitrogenase activity, yield components and seed yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sole chickpea had significantly higher yield than the intercropping system.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
Sole chickpeae0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
intercropping systeme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sole chickpea gave significantly higher yield however, yield attributes and quality parameters were not influenced by intercropping system.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 704–843 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping did not significantly influence chickpea yield attributes or quality parameters.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Treatment
intercropping systeme0
Outcome
yield attributes and quality parameterse0
Direction
not influencede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield attributes and quality parameters were not influenced by intercropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 759–842 · show in text ↑
e1

“Sole chickpea gave significantly higher yield however, yield attributes and quality parameters were not influenced by intercropping system.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 704–843 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

P and S application significantly influenced chickpea growth attributes and nodulation.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
P and S applicatione0
Outcome
growth attributes, nodulatione0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–121 · show in text ↑
e0

“P and S application influenced significantly the growth attributes, nodulation, leghaemoglobin content, nitrogenase activity, yield components and seed yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 844–1002 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

P and S application significantly influenced leghaemoglobin content and nitrogenase activity.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
P and S applicatione0
Outcome
leghaemoglobin content, nitrogenase activitye0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–121 · show in text ↑
e0

“P and S application influenced significantly the growth attributes, nodulation, leghaemoglobin content, nitrogenase activity, yield components and seed yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 844–1002 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

P and S application significantly influenced chickpea yield components and seed yield.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
P and S applicatione0
Outcome
yield components and seed yielde0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–121 · show in text ↑
e0

“P and S application influenced significantly the growth attributes, nodulation, leghaemoglobin content, nitrogenase activity, yield components and seed yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 844–1002 · show in text ↑