Paper · 2004 · International Journal of Pest Management

Field trials with plant products to protect stored cowpea against insect damage

Sara J Boeke; Dansou K Kossou; Arnold Van Huis; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
17
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Plant products were evaluated under field conditions for their efficacy as insecticides against the cowpea beetle, Callosobruchus maculatus, on stored cowpea. Seeds, mixed with finely ground clay and three volatile oils were stored in air-tight jerry-cans and canisters. Pods were treated with leaf powders of two plant species and stored in traditional palm-leaf huts. Beetle damage was evaluated before and after storage. The treatments did not prevent damage, but after treatment with oils, fewer beans showed beetle emergence holes; also, the percentage of uninfested beans and the weight of one litre of beans were each higher than for untreated beans. The percentage of germination of stored beans was highest after treatment with Ocimum basilicum oil. Leaf powder of Momordica charantia was effective against weight loss of stored seeds, whereas Ficus exasperata caused a decrease in both the percentage of infested beans and the number of emerged beetles, and more parasitoids emerged than from untreated beans. Laboratory tests on the effect of the oils on the development of the beetle and on bean germination did not reveal effects of the oils. We compare data obtained from the laboratory and with those obtained in the field.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant product treatments did not prevent stored cowpea damage.

Treatment
The treatmentse0
Outcome
damagee0
Direction
did not prevente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–57 · show in text ↑
e0

“The treatments did not prevent damage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 424–461 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Oil treatment reduced the number of beans with beetle emergence holes.

Treatment
oilse0
Interactor
beetlee0pest
Outcome
beans showed beetle emergence holese0
Direction
fewere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–57 · show in text ↑
e0

“after treatment with oils, fewer beans showed beetle emergence holes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 467–535 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Oil-treated stored cowpea had a higher percentage of uninfested beans and higher one-litre bean weight than untreated beans.

Outcome
percentage of uninfested beans and the weight of one litre of beanse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
untreated beanse0

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–57 · show in text ↑
e0

“the percentage of uninfested beans and the weight of one litre of beans were each higher than for untreated beans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 543–656 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ocimum basilicum oil gave the highest germination percentage of stored cowpea.

Treatment
Ocimum basilicum oile0
Outcome
percentage of germination of stored beanse0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–57 · show in text ↑
e0

“The percentage of germination of stored beans was highest after treatment with Ocimum basilicum oil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 658–757 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Momordica charantia leaf powder reduced stored seed weight loss.

Treatment
Leaf powder of Momordica charantiae0
Outcome
weight loss of stored seedse0
Direction
effective againste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–57 · show in text ↑
e0

“Leaf powder of Momordica charantia was effective against weight loss of stored seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 759–843 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ficus exasperata leaf powder decreased infestation percentage and emerged beetles.

Treatment
Ficus exasperatae0
Interactor
beetlesColeopterae0pest
Outcome
percentage of infested beans and the number of emerged beetlese0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–57 · show in text ↑
e0

“Ficus exasperata caused a decrease in both the percentage of infested beans and the number of emerged beetles”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 853–962 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ficus exasperata treatment yielded more parasitoid emergence than untreated beans.

Interactor
parasitoidse0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
parasitoids emergede0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
untreated beanse0

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–57 · show in text ↑
e0

“more parasitoids emerged than from untreated beans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 968–1018 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Laboratory tests found no oil effect on beetle development or bean germination.

Treatment
oilse0
Interactor
beetlee0pest
Outcome
development of the beetle and on bean germinatione0
Direction
did not reveal effectse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–57 · show in text ↑
e0

“Laboratory tests on the effect of the oils on the development of the beetle and on bean germination did not reveal effects of the oils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1020–1154 · show in text ↑

botanical · quality: postharvest · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 13 positive, 3 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.