Abstract
The objective of this work was to assess the cultivation of cassava and cowpea in different systems and arrangements of plants in Roraima’s savannah, Brazil. The experiment was performed at the experimental field of the Department of Soil and Climate at the UFRR, Boa Vista (Roraima). The experimental design adopted was in randomized blocks, with seven treatments and four replications. The treatments were: 1) a single row of cassava in monoculture; 2) a single row of cassava plus a row of cowpea; 3) a double row of cassava in monoculture; 4) a double row of cassava plus a row of cowpea; 5) a double row of cassava plus two rows of cowpea; 6) a double row of cassava plus three rows of cowpea; and 7) cowpea in monoculture. For the cassava were assessed the following variables: yield of roots, fresh weight of shoot, harvest index, number of roots per plant, roots length, roots diameter, root dry matter, starch content and index of area equivalence. For the cowpea were assessed: yield of the grains (kg ha-1), number of pods per plant, number of seeds per pod, weight of 1000 seeds, and index of area equivalence. The double rows cropping systems of cassava with two and three rows of cowpea allow obtaining equivalent yield to the monoculture of cassava in single rows. The intercropping, regardless of the arrangement, reduces grain yield of cowpea. All treatments in intercropping systems exhibit a satisfactory area equivalence index, with an average of 1.55.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 3
Claim · model-written summary
Double rows of cassava with two or three rows of cowpea give cassava root yield equivalent to single-row cassava monoculture.
- Taxon
- cassava
Manihot esculentae0 - Treatment
- double rows cropping systems of cassava with two and three rows of cowpeae0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- no_changeinferrede0
- Comparator
- monoculture of cassava in single rowse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The double rows cropping systems of cassava with two and three rows of cowpea allow obtaining equivalent yield to the monoculture of cassava in single rows”
Claim · model-written summary
Intercropping reduces grain yield of cowpea regardless of the arrangement.
- Taxon
- cowpea
Vigna unguiculatae1 - Treatment
- intercroppinge1
- Outcome
- grain yielde1
- Direction
- reducese1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e1“The intercropping, regardless of the arrangement, reduces grain yield of cowpea”
Claim · model-written summary
All intercropping treatments of cassava and cowpea show a satisfactory area equivalence index, averaging 1.55.
- Taxon
- cassava and cowpea
Vigna unguiculata
Manihot esculentae2 - Treatment
- intercropping systemse3
- Outcome
- area equivalence indexe3
- Value
- an average of 1.55e3
- Qualifier
- satisfactorye3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.


Verbatim
e2“assess the cultivation of cassava and cowpea in different systems”
e3“All treatments in intercropping systems exhibit a satisfactory area equivalence index, with an average of 1.55”
The same questions in other papers
Vigna unguiculata · yield · Manihot esculenta (cassava)Positive and negative results
6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
16 papers more in this group
See all 20 papers →intercropping · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results differ
39 papers in the same direction as this paper · 63 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
99 papers more in this group
See all 103 papers →cultivation system · yield · Manihot esculenta (cassava)Positive and negative results
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.