Paper · 2015 · Ciência Agronômica/Revista ciência agronômica

Cultivation of cassava and cowpea in intercropping systems held in Roraima’s savannah, Brazil

José de Anchieta Alves de Albuquerque; Larissa Souza de Campos Oliva; José Maria Arcanjo Alves; et al.

3
claims
4
verbatim quotes
22
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The objective of this work was to assess the cultivation of cassava and cowpea in different systems and arrangements of plants in Roraima’s savannah, Brazil. The experiment was performed at the experimental field of the Department of Soil and Climate at the UFRR, Boa Vista (Roraima). The experimental design adopted was in randomized blocks, with seven treatments and four replications. The treatments were: 1) a single row of cassava in monoculture; 2) a single row of cassava plus a row of cowpea; 3) a double row of cassava in monoculture; 4) a double row of cassava plus a row of cowpea; 5) a double row of cassava plus two rows of cowpea; 6) a double row of cassava plus three rows of cowpea; and 7) cowpea in monoculture. For the cassava were assessed the following variables: yield of roots, fresh weight of shoot, harvest index, number of roots per plant, roots length, roots diameter, root dry matter, starch content and index of area equivalence. For the cowpea were assessed: yield of the grains (kg ha-1), number of pods per plant, number of seeds per pod, weight of 1000 seeds, and index of area equivalence. The double rows cropping systems of cassava with two and three rows of cowpea allow obtaining equivalent yield to the monoculture of cassava in single rows. The intercropping, regardless of the arrangement, reduces grain yield of cowpea. All treatments in intercropping systems exhibit a satisfactory area equivalence index, with an average of 1.55.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Double rows of cassava with two or three rows of cowpea give cassava root yield equivalent to single-row cassava monoculture.

Treatment
double rows cropping systems of cassava with two and three rows of cowpeae0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
no_changeinferrede0
Comparator
monoculture of cassava in single rowse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The double rows cropping systems of cassava with two and three rows of cowpea allow obtaining equivalent yield to the monoculture of cassava in single rows”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1123–1278 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping reduces grain yield of cowpea regardless of the arrangement.

Treatment
intercroppinge1
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
reducese1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The intercropping, regardless of the arrangement, reduces grain yield of cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1280–1359 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All intercropping treatments of cassava and cowpea show a satisfactory area equivalence index, averaging 1.55.

Treatment
intercropping systemse3
Outcome
area equivalence indexe3
Value
an average of 1.55e3
Qualifier
satisfactorye3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e2

“assess the cultivation of cassava and cowpea in different systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 34–99 · show in text ↑
e3

“All treatments in intercropping systems exhibit a satisfactory area equivalence index, with an average of 1.55”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1361–1471 · show in text ↑

Vigna unguiculata · yield · Manihot esculenta (cassava)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 13 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
    Cowpea weed management gave net returns of N2843 ha −1.

    Integrated weed management for cassava intercropped with maize · 1986 · compared with control that received two hand‐hoeings

    No difference from an alternative

  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

intercropping · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results differ

103 papers: 63 positive, 40 negative or no effect

39 papers in the same direction as this paper · 63 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

99 papers more in this group

See all 103 papers →

cultivation system · yield · Manihot esculenta (cassava)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 3 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.