Paper · 2009 · Agronomy Journal

Barley Yield and Nutrient Uptake for Soil Amended with Fresh and Composted Cattle Manure

J. J. Miller; B. W. Beasley; C. F. Drury; et al.

15
claims
30
verbatim quotes
65
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Limited research exists on the long‐term effect of fresh (FM) versus composted manure (CM) from beef cattle on barley ( Hordeum vulgare L.) yield and nutrient uptake. Barley was grown (1999–2007) as silage on an irrigated clay loam soil in southern Alberta where organic amendments and fertilizer were annually applied for 9 yr in the fall of 1998 to 2006. The treatments were three rates (13, 39, 77 Mg ha −1 dry wt.) of FM or CM containing either straw or wood‐chip bedding, one inorganic fertilizer treatment, and a nonfertilized control. Nine years of annual application of FM and CM resulted in similar aboveground dry matter yield, and total N and total P uptake compared with inorganic fertilizer. However, apparent nitrogen recovery (ANR) and phosphorus recovery (APR) were significantly lower for FM and CM (5–9%) than inorganic (22–47%). Barley dry matter yield, ANR, and APR were similar for FM and CM. Manure type influenced N and P uptake, but the effects varied with bedding type and year. The N and P uptake were greater for CM with straw than the other three treatments except FM with straw. The DM yield was similar for straw and wood bedding, but ANR was greater for straw (10%) than wood (7%). Bedding influenced N uptake, P uptake, and APR, but the effects varied with manure type, rate, and year. Based on the results of this study, producers converting from FM to CM, or from straw to wood‐chip bedding, should suffer no loss in barley silage production.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fresh and composted manure produced similar aboveground dry matter yield to inorganic fertilizer.

Treatment
FM and CMe0
Outcome
aboveground dry matter yielde0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
inorganic fertilizere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nine years of annual application of FM and CM resulted in similar aboveground dry matter yield, and total N and total P uptake compared with inorganic fertilizer.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 542–704 · show in text ↑
t0

“Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–6 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fresh and composted manure produced similar total N to inorganic fertilizer.

Treatment
FM and CMe0
Outcome
total Ne0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
inorganic fertilizere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nine years of annual application of FM and CM resulted in similar aboveground dry matter yield, and total N and total P uptake compared with inorganic fertilizer.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 542–704 · show in text ↑
t0

“Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–6 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fresh and composted manure produced similar total P to inorganic fertilizer.

Treatment
FM and CMe0
Outcome
total Pe0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
inorganic fertilizere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nine years of annual application of FM and CM resulted in similar aboveground dry matter yield, and total N and total P uptake compared with inorganic fertilizer.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 542–704 · show in text ↑
t0

“Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–6 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

apparent nitrogen recovery (ANR) was lower under manure than inorganic fertilizer.

Treatment
FM and CMe0
Outcome
apparent nitrogen recovery (ANR)e0
Direction
lowere0
Value
5–9%e0
Qualifier
22–47%e0
Comparator
inorganice0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However, apparent nitrogen recovery (ANR) and phosphorus recovery (APR) were significantly lower for FM and CM (5–9%) than inorganic (22–47%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 705–847 · show in text ↑
t0

“Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–6 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

phosphorus recovery (APR) was lower under manure than inorganic fertilizer.

Treatment
FM and CMe0
Outcome
phosphorus recovery (APR)e0
Direction
lowere0
Value
5–9%e0
Qualifier
22–47%e0
Comparator
inorganice0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However, apparent nitrogen recovery (ANR) and phosphorus recovery (APR) were significantly lower for FM and CM (5–9%) than inorganic (22–47%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 705–847 · show in text ↑
t0

“Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–6 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

dry matter yield was similar under fresh and composted manure.

Treatment
FMe0
Outcome
dry matter yielde0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
CMe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Barley dry matter yield, ANR, and APR were similar for FM and CM.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 848–913 · show in text ↑
t0

“Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–6 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ANR was similar under fresh and composted manure.

Treatment
FMe0
Outcome
ANRe0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
CMe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Barley dry matter yield, ANR, and APR were similar for FM and CM.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 848–913 · show in text ↑
t0

“Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–6 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

APR was similar under fresh and composted manure.

Treatment
FMe0
Outcome
APRe0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
CMe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Barley dry matter yield, ANR, and APR were similar for FM and CM.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 848–913 · show in text ↑
t0

“Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–6 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Manure type affected N and P uptake depending on bedding and year.

Treatment
Manure typee0
Outcome
N and P uptakee0
Qualifier
varied with bedding type and yeare0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Manure type influenced N and P uptake, but the effects varied with bedding type and year.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 914–1003 · show in text ↑
t0

“Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–6 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Composted manure with straw gave greater N and P uptake than other treatments except fresh manure with straw.

Treatment
CM with strawe0
Outcome
N and P uptakee0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
the other three treatments except FM with strawe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The N and P uptake were greater for CM with straw than the other three treatments except FM with straw.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1004–1107 · show in text ↑
t0

“Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–6 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry matter yield was similar with straw and wood bedding.

Treatment
strawe0
Outcome
DM yielde0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
wood beddinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The DM yield was similar for straw and wood bedding, but ANR was greater for straw (10%) than wood (7%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1108–1212 · show in text ↑
t0

“Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–6 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Apparent nitrogen recovery was greater with straw than wood bedding.

Treatment
strawe0
Outcome
ANRe0
Direction
greatere0
Value
10%e0
Qualifier
7%e0
Comparator
woode0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The DM yield was similar for straw and wood bedding, but ANR was greater for straw (10%) than wood (7%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1108–1212 · show in text ↑
t0

“Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–6 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bedding affected N uptake, P uptake, and APR depending on manure type, rate, and year.

Treatment
Beddinge0
Outcome
N uptake, P uptake, and APRe0
Qualifier
varied with manure type, rate, and yeare0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Bedding influenced N uptake, P uptake, and APR, but the effects varied with manure type, rate, and year.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1213–1317 · show in text ↑
t0

“Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–6 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Converting from fresh to composted manure should not reduce barley silage production.

Outcome
converting from FM to CMe0
Direction
no losse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Based on the results of this study, producers converting from FM to CM, or from straw to wood‐chip bedding, should suffer no loss in barley silage production.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1318–1476 · show in text ↑
t0

“Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–6 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Converting from straw to wood-chip bedding should not reduce barley silage production.

Outcome
from straw to wood‐chip beddinge0
Direction
no losse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Based on the results of this study, producers converting from FM to CM, or from straw to wood‐chip bedding, should suffer no loss in barley silage production.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1318–1476 · show in text ↑
t0

“Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–6 · show in text ↑

fertilization · nutrient: efficiency · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 6 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

120 papers: 96 positive, 24 negative or no effect

95 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

116 papers more in this group

See all 120 papers →

fertilization · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

550 papers: 473 positive, 77 negative or no effect

76 papers in the same direction as this paper · 473 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

546 papers more in this group

See all 550 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.