Paper · 1974 · Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry

The response of lucerne cultivars to levels of waterlogging

VE Rogers

10
claims
21
verbatim quotes
19
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Five lucerne cultivars were grown for 10 weeks during summer at two irrigation frequencies, specified by evaporation intervals of 38 and 76 mm. Changes in soil moisture were monitored by tensiometers installed at 15 and 30 cm depths. At the first harvest no significant difference in yield was found between treatments. At the second harvest, regrowth of all cultivars was depressed by frequent irrigation, but Du Puits was particularly affected. The yield depression caused by frequent irrigation continued for six months after the treatment ended. The reduced growth following frequent irrigation was related to low soil aeration. In this treatment air-filled pore space in the 15-30 cm horizon remained at or below 15 per cent, a critical level for plant growth. A period of waterlogging for 10 days when the temperature at 5 cm depth remained at approximately 30¦C led to reduced production and high mortality in all cultivars. Yields of Lahontan and Siro Peruvian at the end of the waterlogging period were significantly higher than yields of the other three cultivars. The possibility is suggested of increasing the tolerance of lucerne to poor aeration by natural selection on wet soils.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

First-harvest yield did not differ significantly between irrigation treatments.

Taxon
lucerne cultivarsMedicago sativat0
Treatment
two irrigation frequenciese1
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
no significant differencee0
Comparator
38 and 76 mme1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At the first harvest no significant difference in yield was found between treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 234–318 · show in text ↑
e1

“two irrigation frequencies, specified by evaporation intervals of 38 and 76 mm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 64–142 · show in text ↑
t0

“lucerne cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–33 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Frequent irrigation depressed second-harvest regrowth of all cultivars.

Taxon
lucerne cultivarsMedicago sativat0
Treatment
frequent irrigatione0
Outcome
regrowthe0
Direction
depressede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“regrowth of all cultivars was depressed by frequent irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 343–405 · show in text ↑
t0

“lucerne cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–33 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Du Puits was particularly affected by frequent irrigation.

Taxon
lucerne cultivarsMedicago sativat0
Material
Du Puitse0
Treatment
frequent irrigatione1
Outcome
particularly affectede0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Du Puits was particularly affected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 411–445 · show in text ↑
t0

“lucerne cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–33 · show in text ↑
e1

“regrowth of all cultivars was depressed by frequent irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 343–405 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield depression after frequent irrigation persisted for six months after treatment.

Taxon
lucerne cultivarsMedicago sativat0
Treatment
frequent irrigatione0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
depressione0
Qualifier
six months after the treatment endede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The yield depression caused by frequent irrigation continued for six months after the treatment ended”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 447–548 · show in text ↑
t0

“lucerne cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–33 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced growth after frequent irrigation was related to low soil aeration.

Taxon
lucerne cultivarsMedicago sativat0
Treatment
frequent irrigatione0
Outcome
reduced growthe0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
low soil aeratione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The reduced growth following frequent irrigation was related to low soil aeration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 550–631 · show in text ↑
t0

“lucerne cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–33 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ten days of waterlogging at approximately 30¦C reduced production across cultivars.

Taxon
lucerne cultivarsMedicago sativat0
Treatment
waterlogging for 10 dayse0
Outcome
productione0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
approximately 30¦Ce0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“waterlogging for 10 days when the temperature at 5 cm depth remained at approximately 30¦C led to reduced production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 778–894 · show in text ↑
t0

“lucerne cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–33 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ten days of waterlogging at approximately 30¦C caused high mortality across cultivars.

Taxon
lucerne cultivarsMedicago sativat0
Treatment
waterlogging for 10 dayse0
Outcome
mortalitye0
Direction
highe0
Qualifier
approximately 30¦Ce0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“waterlogging for 10 days when the temperature at 5 cm depth remained at approximately 30¦C led to reduced production and high mortality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 778–913 · show in text ↑
t0

“lucerne cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–33 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Lahontan yield was significantly higher than that of three other cultivars after waterlogging.

Taxon
lucerne cultivarsMedicago sativat0
Material
Lahontane0
Treatment
waterlogginge0
Outcome
Yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
the other three cultivarse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yields of Lahontan and Siro Peruvian at the end of the waterlogging period were significantly higher than yields of the other three cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 932–1073 · show in text ↑
t0

“lucerne cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–33 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Siro Peruvian yield was significantly higher than that of three other cultivars after waterlogging.

Taxon
lucerne cultivarsMedicago sativat0
Material
Siro Peruviane0
Treatment
waterlogginge0
Outcome
Yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
the other three cultivarse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yields of Lahontan and Siro Peruvian at the end of the waterlogging period were significantly higher than yields of the other three cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 932–1073 · show in text ↑
t0

“lucerne cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–33 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest natural selection on wet soils to increase lucerne tolerance of poor aeration.

Taxon
lucerneMedicago sativae0
Outcome
natural selection on wet soilse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increasing the tolerance of lucerne to poor aeration by natural selection on wet soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1107–1193 · show in text ↑

flooding · yield · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Results differ

9 papers: 0 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

irrigation · yield · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Results differ

92 papers: 66 positive, 26 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 66 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

88 papers more in this group

See all 92 papers →

flooding · pest · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

irrigation · growth · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

37 papers: 22 positive, 15 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

33 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.