Paper · 2010 · Water Science & Technology

Rainwater harvesting potentials for drought mitigation in Iran

J. Tabatabaee; M. Y. Han

2
claims
3
verbatim quotes
15
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In order to evaluate the potential of rainwater harvesting (RWH) for mitigating water scarcity in a semi-arid zone of the country (Mashhad-Iran), three typical RWH systems were installed and monitored. The first system consists of 5,000 m² natural ground catchment which was leveled and covered with plastic sheets allowing for maximum possible runoff generation. Surface runoff was conducted into a 500 m³ ground reservoir via a series of draining ditches and an end collection channel. The water collected from a plastic covered catchment was used for irrigation of dryland wheat cultivation. According to the result of two years measurements, grain yield was almost doubled in irrigated plots when compared to conventional rainfed cultivation. In the second RWH system, runoff generated from about 2 ha asphaltic road and parking was diverted into a 1,200 m³ ground reservoir. The results of 2 years measurement for reservoir inflow and outflow indicated that runoff generated during rainy season was sufficient to produce necessary water for irrigating 900 planted fruit trees during successive dry seasons. The last experiment reported here is about a 40 m² roof area which was connected to a plastic tank for runoff measurement. The conclusion was that the proposed RWH system can produce enough water for building's toilets' flashes and other sanitary purposes so that the potable water could be saved considerably. In general, the results of three rainwater harvesting experiments showed the importance of using rainwater for compensating the effect of water shortages which is repeatedly occurring due to the effect of current climate change and ever increasing water utilization for drinking and food production.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation with harvested rainwater almost doubled wheat grain yield compared with rainfed cultivation.

Treatment
irrigated plotse0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
almost doublede0
Comparator
conventional rainfed cultivatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grain yield was almost doubled in irrigated plots when compared to conventional rainfed cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 646–745 · show in text ↑
t0

“dryland wheat cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 568–593 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Road and parking runoff supplied enough water to irrigate 900 planted fruit trees through successive dry seasons.

Taxon
fruit treese0
Outcome
water for irrigating 900 planted fruit treese0
Value
900 planted fruit treese0
Qualifier
during successive dry seasonse0

Verbatim

e0

“runoff generated during rainy season was sufficient to produce necessary water for irrigating 900 planted fruit trees during successive dry seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 963–1110 · show in text ↑

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

797 papers in the same direction as this paper · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

985 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.