Paper · 2008 · International Journal of Biotechnology

The economic impacts of second generation Bt cotton in West Africa: empirical evidence from Burkina Faso

Jeffrey Vitale; Harvey Glick; John Greenplate; et al.

3
claims
3
verbatim quotes
27
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

West Africa has been slow in adopting agricultural biotechnology. The most progressive stance has been taken by Burkina Faso, which began field testing Bt cotton in 2003. This paper reports the first three years of Bt cotton field trials, which found that Bt cotton increased cotton yields by an average of 20% and reduced insecticide applications by two-thirds. While the technical success of Bt cotton is encouraging, the tests were confined to small scale plots and unit returns found on the experiment station. This paper extrapolates the field test results to the national scale using an economic model, which predicts the economic impacts of introducing Bt cotton in the Burkina Faso cotton sector. The model results found that Bt cotton would generate benefits of $106 per year under typical pest density conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bt cotton increased cotton yield by an average of 20% in field trials.

Treatment
Bt cottone0
Outcome
cotton yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
20%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Bt cotton increased cotton yields by an average of 20%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 256–310 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bt cotton reduced insecticide applications by two-thirds in field trials.

Treatment
Bt cottone0
Outcome
insecticide applicationse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
two-thirdse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Bt cotton increased cotton yields by an average of 20% and reduced insecticide applications by two-thirds.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 256–362 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositiveprojected

Claim · model-written summary

The model predicted $106 yearly benefits under typical pest density.

Outcome
benefitse0
Value
$106 per yeare0
Qualifier
typical pest density conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Bt cotton would generate benefits of $106 per year under typical pest density conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 734–823 · show in text ↑

transgenic · molecular: metabolites · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

27 papers: 24 positive, 3 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

transgenic · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

78 papers: 74 positive, 4 negative or no effect

73 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

74 papers more in this group

See all 78 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.