Abstract
본 연구는 국내 육성 밀 3품종을 이용하여 파종량과 밀잎집눈무늬병의 발생정도를 조사하고, 이 식물병을 효과적으로 방제하기 위한 약제를 선발하기 하기 위하여 수행되었다. 파종량이 기준량의 2배로 증가할 때 발병률이 약 13% 증가하였다. 그러나 감수성인 조품밀만이 2배량 파종시에 발병률이 높아지는 유의적인 차이를 보였다. 잎집눈무늬병의 방제 약제 선발을 위해 배지상에서 약제별 효과를 검정한 결과, Triazole 계통인 Hexaconazole EC과 Tebuconazole EC는 균사생장을 효과적으로 억제하였다. 하지만 strobilurin 계통의 Pyraclostrobin EC과 Trifloxystrobin SC는 균사 억제 효과가 약하였다. 식물체에 직접 처리하여 약효를 검정한 결과, in vivo 활성과 in vitro 활성은 유사하게 나타났고 예방효과가 치료효과보다 높은 것으로 나타났다. 즉, Hexaconazole EC와 Tebuconazole EC의 예방효과는 각각 64%와 73%였고, 치료효과는 각각 45%와 39%였다. 본 연구결과는 Hexaconazole EC와 Tebuconazole EC가 밀에 발생하는 입짚눈무늬병의 방제제로 이용될 수 있다는 것을 나타낸다. This study was conducted to examine the effects of the seeding rate on the disease incidence of sharp eyespot(Rhizoctonia cerealis) on three different varieties and to select effective chemicals to control the disease. When the seeds were sown twice as many as the recommendation, the disease incidence increased by approximately 13%. However, the susceptible variety 'Jopummil' alone showed the significantly enhanced disease incidence at a two-fold seeding rate. Two chemicals such as Hexaconazole EC and Tebuconazole EC highly inhibited the fungal growth on agar medium. However, two strobilurin fungicides such as Pyraclostrobin EC and Trifloxystrobin SC were relatively weak. The fungicides tested displayed the similar in vivo antifungal activities as in vitro activities. Hexaconazole EC and Tebuconazole EC showed the strongest both protective and curative activities and the protective activities of the chemicals were generally higher than the curative activities. Hexaconazole EC and Tebuconazole EC controlled the disease by 64% and 73%, respectively, and the two chemicals reduced the disease by 45% and 39%, respectively, when they were applied one day after pathogen inoculation. These results indicate that both Hexaconazole EC and Tebuconazole EC could be used to control sharp eyespot on wheat.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 12
Claim · model-written summary
Sowing wheat at twice the recommended seed rate increased sharp eyespot incidence by about 13%.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume7 - Treatment
- seeds were sown twice as many as the recommendatione1
- Interactor
- Rhizoctonia cerealis
Ceratobasidium cerealee0pathogen - Outcome
- disease incidencee1
- Direction
- increasede1
- Value
- approximately 13%e1
- Comparator
- the recommendatione1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“This study was conducted to examine the effects of the seeding rate on the disease incidence of sharp eyespot(Rhizoctonia cerealis) on three different varieties”
e1“When the seeds were sown twice as many as the recommendation, the disease incidence increased by approximately 13%”
e7“These results indicate that both Hexaconazole EC and Tebuconazole EC could be used to control sharp eyespot on wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
The susceptible wheat variety Jopummil showed significantly enhanced sharp eyespot incidence at a two-fold seeding rate.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume7
- Material
- Jopummile2
- Treatment
- two-fold seeding ratee2
- Interactor
- Rhizoctonia cerealisCeratobasidium cerealee0pathogen
- Outcome
- disease incidencee2
- Direction
- enhancede2
- Qualifier
- susceptiblee2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“This study was conducted to examine the effects of the seeding rate on the disease incidence of sharp eyespot(Rhizoctonia cerealis) on three different varieties”
e2“However, the susceptible variety 'Jopummil' alone showed the significantly enhanced disease incidence at a two-fold seeding rate”
e7“These results indicate that both Hexaconazole EC and Tebuconazole EC could be used to control sharp eyespot on wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Hexaconazole EC and Tebuconazole EC inhibited in vitro growth of Rhizoctonia cerealis on agar medium.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume7
- Treatment
- Hexaconazole EC and Tebuconazole ECe3
- Interactor
- Rhizoctonia cerealisCeratobasidium cerealee0pathogen
- Outcome
- fungal growthe3
- Direction
- inhibitede3
- Setting
- agar mediume3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“This study was conducted to examine the effects of the seeding rate on the disease incidence of sharp eyespot(Rhizoctonia cerealis) on three different varieties”
e3“Two chemicals such as Hexaconazole EC and Tebuconazole EC highly inhibited the fungal growth on agar medium. However, two strobilurin fungicides such as Pyraclostrobin EC and Trifloxystrobin SC were relatively weak”
e7“These results indicate that both Hexaconazole EC and Tebuconazole EC could be used to control sharp eyespot on wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Pyraclostrobin EC and Trifloxystrobin SC were relatively weak in inhibiting in vitro fungal growth.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume7
- Treatment
- Pyraclostrobin EC and Trifloxystrobin SCe3
- Interactor
- Rhizoctonia cerealisCeratobasidium cerealee0pathogen
- Outcome
- fungal growthe3
- Direction
- relatively weake3
- Setting
- agar mediume3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“This study was conducted to examine the effects of the seeding rate on the disease incidence of sharp eyespot(Rhizoctonia cerealis) on three different varieties”
e3“Two chemicals such as Hexaconazole EC and Tebuconazole EC highly inhibited the fungal growth on agar medium. However, two strobilurin fungicides such as Pyraclostrobin EC and Trifloxystrobin SC were relatively weak”
e7“These results indicate that both Hexaconazole EC and Tebuconazole EC could be used to control sharp eyespot on wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
In vivo antifungal activities of the tested fungicides were similar to their in vitro activities against Rhizoctonia cerealis.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume7
- Interactor
- Rhizoctonia cerealisCeratobasidium cerealee0pathogen
- Outcome
- in vivo antifungal activitiese4
- Qualifier
- as in vitro activitiese4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“This study was conducted to examine the effects of the seeding rate on the disease incidence of sharp eyespot(Rhizoctonia cerealis) on three different varieties”
e4“The fungicides tested displayed the similar in vivo antifungal activities as in vitro activities”
e7“These results indicate that both Hexaconazole EC and Tebuconazole EC could be used to control sharp eyespot on wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Hexaconazole EC and Tebuconazole EC showed the strongest protective and curative activities among the tested fungicides.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume7
- Treatment
- Hexaconazole EC and Tebuconazole ECe5
- Outcome
- protective and curative activitiese5
- Direction
- strongeste5
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e5“Hexaconazole EC and Tebuconazole EC showed the strongest both protective and curative activities and the protective activities of the chemicals were generally higher than the curative activities”
e7“These results indicate that both Hexaconazole EC and Tebuconazole EC could be used to control sharp eyespot on wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Protective activities of the chemicals were generally higher than their curative activities.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume7
- Outcome
- protective activitiese5
- Direction
- highere5
- Qualifier
- generallye5
- Comparator
- curative activitiese5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e5“Hexaconazole EC and Tebuconazole EC showed the strongest both protective and curative activities and the protective activities of the chemicals were generally higher than the curative activities”
e7“These results indicate that both Hexaconazole EC and Tebuconazole EC could be used to control sharp eyespot on wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Hexaconazole EC controlled sharp eyespot by 64%.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume7
- Treatment
- Hexaconazole ECe6
- Outcome
- the diseasee6
- Direction
- controllede6
- Value
- 64%e6
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e6“Hexaconazole EC and Tebuconazole EC controlled the disease by 64% and 73%, respectively, and the two chemicals reduced the disease by 45% and 39%, respectively, when they were applied one day after pathogen inoculation”
e7“These results indicate that both Hexaconazole EC and Tebuconazole EC could be used to control sharp eyespot on wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Tebuconazole EC controlled sharp eyespot by 73%.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume7
- Treatment
- Tebuconazole ECe6
- Outcome
- the diseasee6
- Direction
- controllede6
- Value
- 73%e6
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e6“Hexaconazole EC and Tebuconazole EC controlled the disease by 64% and 73%, respectively, and the two chemicals reduced the disease by 45% and 39%, respectively, when they were applied one day after pathogen inoculation”
e7“These results indicate that both Hexaconazole EC and Tebuconazole EC could be used to control sharp eyespot on wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Hexaconazole EC reduced sharp eyespot by 45% when applied one day after inoculation.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume7
- Treatment
- Hexaconazole ECe6
- Outcome
- the diseasee6
- Direction
- reducede6
- Value
- 45%e6
- Qualifier
- applied one day after pathogen inoculatione6
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e6“Hexaconazole EC and Tebuconazole EC controlled the disease by 64% and 73%, respectively, and the two chemicals reduced the disease by 45% and 39%, respectively, when they were applied one day after pathogen inoculation”
e7“These results indicate that both Hexaconazole EC and Tebuconazole EC could be used to control sharp eyespot on wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Tebuconazole EC reduced sharp eyespot by 39% when applied one day after inoculation.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume7
- Treatment
- Tebuconazole ECe6
- Outcome
- the diseasee6
- Direction
- reducede6
- Value
- 39%e6
- Qualifier
- applied one day after pathogen inoculatione6
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e6“Hexaconazole EC and Tebuconazole EC controlled the disease by 64% and 73%, respectively, and the two chemicals reduced the disease by 45% and 39%, respectively, when they were applied one day after pathogen inoculation”
e7“These results indicate that both Hexaconazole EC and Tebuconazole EC could be used to control sharp eyespot on wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Hexaconazole EC and Tebuconazole EC could be used to control sharp eyespot on wheat.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume7
- Outcome
- control sharp eyespote7
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e7“These results indicate that both Hexaconazole EC and Tebuconazole EC could be used to control sharp eyespot on wheat”
The same questions in other papers
hexaconazole · Ceratobasidium cereale · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
tebuconazole · Ceratobasidium cereale · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
hexaconazole · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree
5 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →tebuconazole · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree
35 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
32 papers more in this group
See all 36 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.