Paper · 1984 · Nematologica

Relationship Between Glomus Fascicula Tum Root Colonization of Cotton and Its Effect On Meloidogyne Incognita1)

H. Saleh; R.A. Sikora

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
39
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The interaction between Glomus fasciculatum and Meloidogyne incognita on cotton was studied in the greenhouse. No increases in plant growth were noticed at mycorrhizal inoculation rates of 30 to 480 chlamydospores per plant. Plant growth, however, increased 41 % when inoculated with 750 spores per plant, equivalent to one spore per cm3 soil. Inoculation of 30 spores per plant resulted in root colonization of only 38% and no effect on the nematode population. At densities of 60, 120 and 240 spores per plant, mycorrhizal root levels increased to 55-60% and egg number per plant was significantly reduced. At concentrations of 480 spores per plant, and root colonization levels of 87% , total egg and nematode densities were greatly suppressed. Nematodes and eggs were reduced 41 % on plants inoculated simultaneously at planting with 750 spores, compared to plants inoculated with the nematode alone. The symbiont caused a reduction of 59% in egg and nematode numbers per gm. of root. Fungal root colonization associated with this reduction exceeded 90 % .

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizal inoculation at 30 to 480 chlamydospores per plant did not increase cotton growth.

Treatment
mycorrhizal inoculation rates of 30 to 480 chlamydospores per plante0
Outcome
plant growthe0
Direction
No increasese0

Not reportedInteractorInteractor roleComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No increases in plant growth were noticed at mycorrhizal inoculation rates of 30 to 480 chlamydospores per plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 111–223 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation with 750 spores per plant increased cotton growth by 41%.

Treatment
inoculated with 750 spores per plante0
Outcome
Plant growthe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
41 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plant growth, however, increased 41 % when inoculated with 750 spores per plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 225–304 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–69 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation with 30 spores per plant produced 38% root colonization.

Treatment
Inoculation of 30 spores per plante0
Outcome
root colonizatione0
Value
38%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation of 30 spores per plant resulted in root colonization of only 38%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 344–420 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation with 30 spores per plant had no effect on nematode population.

Treatment
Inoculation of 30 spores per plante0
Outcome
nematode populatione0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedInteractorInteractor roleComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation of 30 spores per plant resulted in root colonization of only 38% and no effect on the nematode population”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 344–461 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 60, 120 and 240 spores per plant, mycorrhizal root colonization increased to 55–60%.

Treatment
60, 120 and 240 spores per plante0
Outcome
mycorrhizal root levelse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
55-60%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At densities of 60, 120 and 240 spores per plant, mycorrhizal root levels increased to 55-60%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 463–556 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At 60, 120 and 240 spores per plant, egg number per plant was significantly reduced.

Treatment
60, 120 and 240 spores per plante0
Outcome
egg number per plante0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedInteractorInteractor roleComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At densities of 60, 120 and 240 spores per plant, mycorrhizal root levels increased to 55-60% and egg number per plant was significantly reduced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 463–607 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 480 spores per plant and 87% root colonization, egg and nematode densities were greatly suppressed.

Treatment
480 spores per plante0
Outcome
total egg and nematode densitiese0
Direction
suppressede0
Qualifier
root colonization levels of 87%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At concentrations of 480 spores per plant, and root colonization levels of 87% , total egg and nematode densities were greatly suppressed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 609–746 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Simultaneous inoculation with 750 spores reduced nematodes and eggs by 41% relative to nematode alone.

Treatment
inoculated simultaneously at planting with 750 sporese0
Outcome
Nematodes and eggse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
41 %e0
Comparator
plants inoculated with the nematode alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nematodes and eggs were reduced 41 % on plants inoculated simultaneously at planting with 750 spores, compared to plants inoculated with the nematode alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 748–903 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The symbiont reduced egg and nematode numbers per gram of root by 59%.

Treatment
The symbionte0
Outcome
egg and nematode numbers per gm. of roote0
Direction
reductione0
Value
59%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The symbiont caused a reduction of 59% in egg and nematode numbers per gm. of root”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 905–987 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–69 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungal root colonization associated with the reduction exceeded 90%.

Outcome
Fungal root colonizatione0
Direction
exceedede0
Value
90 %e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fungal root colonization associated with this reduction exceeded 90 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 989–1058 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–69 · show in text ↑

mycorrhiza · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

31 papers: 29 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 29 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

inoculation · pest · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 7 positive, 4 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

inoculation · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

73 papers: 61 positive, 12 negative or no effect

60 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

69 papers more in this group

See all 73 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.