Paper · 1970 · Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry

Studies on seed pelleting as an aid to legume seed inoculation. 2. Survival of Rhizobium meliloti applied to medic seed sown into dry soil

J Brockwell; RDB Whalley

4
claims
12
verbatim quotes
22
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Seed of Medicago truncatula and Medicago littoralis, with and without lime pelleting and inoculation, was sown dry into medic-free, Rhizobim meliloti-free soils at 12 sites in the Western Division of New South Wales. At the different sites, periods between 1 and 88 days elapsed before germinating rain fell. Seedling nodulation was used as the index of inoculant survival. Nodulation was variable, but the variation was independent of the time between sowing and germination. Best nodulation occurred in treatments in which peat inoculant was incorporated within a lime pellet around the seed. These treatments were superior to others where broth inoculant was incorporated in the pellet or where peat inoculant was applied externally to pelleted or unpelleted seed. Nodulation was improved by incorporating an increased level of peat inoculant in the pellet. In storage, a very low survival rate was recorded in all treatments except those incorporating peat inoculant within the pellet. The results are discussed in relation to the practicalities of pre-inoculation techniques and of sowing inoculated medic seed into dry seed beds.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Peat inoculant incorporated within a lime pellet gave the best nodulation, superior to broth inoculant in the pellet or externally applied peat inoculant.

Taxon
Medicago truncatula and Medicago littoralisMedicago truncatulaMedicago littoralise0
Treatment
peat inoculant was incorporated within a lime pellet around the seede1
Interactor
Rhizobium melilotiSinorhizobium melilotit0symbiont
Outcome
Nodulatione1
Direction
superiore2
Comparator
broth inoculant was incorporated in the pellete2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago truncatula
Medicago truncatula · TaxonNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Medicago littoralis
Medicago littoralis · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDenis Barthel · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Sinorhizobium meliloti
Sinorhizobium meliloti · InteractorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seed of Medicago truncatula and Medicago littoralis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–51 · show in text ↑
e1

“Best nodulation occurred in treatments in which peat inoculant was incorporated within a lime pellet around the seed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 477–593 · show in text ↑
e2

“These treatments were superior to others where broth inoculant was incorporated in the pellet or where peat inoculant was applied externally to pelleted or unpelleted seed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 595–766 · show in text ↑
t0

“Survival of Rhizobium meliloti applied to medic seed sown into dry soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–138 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing the level of peat inoculant in the pellet improved nodulation.

Taxon
Medicago truncatula and Medicago littoralisMedicago truncatulaMedicago littoralise0
Treatment
incorporating an increased level of peat inoculant in the pellete3
Interactor
Rhizobium melilotiSinorhizobium melilotit0symbiont
Outcome
Nodulatione3
Direction
improvede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago truncatula
Medicago truncatula · TaxonNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Medicago littoralis
Medicago littoralis · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDenis Barthel · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Sinorhizobium meliloti
Sinorhizobium meliloti · InteractorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seed of Medicago truncatula and Medicago littoralis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–51 · show in text ↑
e3

“Nodulation was improved by incorporating an increased level of peat inoculant in the pellet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 768–859 · show in text ↑
t0

“Survival of Rhizobium meliloti applied to medic seed sown into dry soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–138 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In storage, Rhizobium meliloti survival was very low in all treatments except those with peat inoculant within the pellet.

Taxon
Medicago truncatula and Medicago littoralisMedicago truncatulaMedicago littoralise0
Interactor
Rhizobium melilotiSinorhizobium melilotit0symbiont
Outcome
survival ratee4
Direction
very lowe4
Qualifier
In storagee4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago truncatula
Medicago truncatula · TaxonNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Medicago littoralis
Medicago littoralis · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDenis Barthel · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Sinorhizobium meliloti
Sinorhizobium meliloti · InteractorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seed of Medicago truncatula and Medicago littoralis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–51 · show in text ↑
e4

“In storage, a very low survival rate was recorded in all treatments except those incorporating peat inoculant within the pellet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 861–988 · show in text ↑
t0

“Survival of Rhizobium meliloti applied to medic seed sown into dry soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–138 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Variation in nodulation was independent of the time between sowing and germination.

Taxon
Medicago truncatula and Medicago littoralisMedicago truncatulaMedicago littoralise0
Outcome
variatione5
Direction
independente5
Comparator
time between sowing and germinatione5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago truncatula
Medicago truncatula · TaxonNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Medicago littoralis
Medicago littoralis · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDenis Barthel · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seed of Medicago truncatula and Medicago littoralis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–51 · show in text ↑
e5

“Nodulation was variable, but the variation was independent of the time between sowing and germination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 374–475 · show in text ↑

inoculation · Sinorhizobium meliloti · Medicago truncatula (barrel medic)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.