Paper · 2013 · Journal of Pesticide Science

Effect of application timing of metconazole on Fusarium head blight development and mycotoxin contamination in wheat and barley

Hideaki Tateishi; Taiji Miyake; Masaru Mori; et al.

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
29
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The effect of application timing of metconazole on the control of Fusarium head blight (HFB) and mycotoxin accumulation in wheat and barley was investigated. Single and double applications of metconazole at different spray timings were performed in a wheat field trial. In single application plots, the mid-flowering stage was the optimal application timing of metconazole for controlling FHB symptom development, and the milking stage was optimal for reducing mycotoxin contamination. Similar efficacies were observed in all spray timings in double application plots, which included the mid-flowering stage and another spray timing. In the barley field trial, application at the mid-flowering stage controlled both FHB development and mycotoxin contamination with the highest efficacy. Similar efficacies for controlling the development of FHB in the barley field were observed with single and double applications of the fungicide. However, mycotoxin contamination was lower with double application than with single application of the fungicide.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mid-flowering metconazole application best controlled wheat head blight symptoms among single applications.

Treatment
mid-flowering stagee0
Interactor
FusariumFusariumt0pathogen
Outcome
FHB symptom developmente0
Direction
optimale0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium
Fusarium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In single application plots, the mid-flowering stage was the optimal application timing of metconazole for controlling FHB symptom development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 270–412 · show in text ↑
t0

“Fusarium head blight development and mycotoxin contamination in wheat and barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–127 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Milking-stage application best reduced wheat mycotoxin contamination among single applications.

Treatment
milking stagee0
Interactor
FusariumFusariumt0pathogen
Outcome
mycotoxin contaminatione0
Direction
reducinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium
Fusarium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the milking stage was optimal for reducing mycotoxin contamination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 418–484 · show in text ↑
t0

“Fusarium head blight development and mycotoxin contamination in wheat and barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–127 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Double applications including mid-flowering showed similar efficacy across spray timings in wheat.

Treatment
double application plotse0
Interactor
FusariumFusariumt0pathogen
Outcome
Similar efficaciese0
Direction
Similare0
Comparator
all spray timingse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium
Fusarium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Similar efficacies were observed in all spray timings in double application plots, which included the mid-flowering stage and another spray timing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 486–632 · show in text ↑
t0

“Fusarium head blight development and mycotoxin contamination in wheat and barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–127 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mid-flowering metconazole application gave the highest efficacy against barley head blight and mycotoxin contamination.

Treatment
application at the mid-flowering stagee0
Interactor
FusariumFusariumt0pathogen
Outcome
FHB development and mycotoxin contaminatione0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium
Fusarium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the barley field trial, application at the mid-flowering stage controlled both FHB development and mycotoxin contamination with the highest efficacy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 634–785 · show in text ↑
t0

“Fusarium head blight development and mycotoxin contamination in wheat and barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–127 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Single and double metconazole applications had similar efficacy against barley head blight.

Treatment
double applications of the fungicidee0
Interactor
FusariumFusariumt0pathogen
Outcome
development of FHBe0
Direction
Similare0
Comparator
singlee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium
Fusarium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Similar efficacies for controlling the development of FHB in the barley field were observed with single and double applications of the fungicide”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 787–931 · show in text ↑
t0

“Fusarium head blight development and mycotoxin contamination in wheat and barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–127 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Double metconazole application lowered barley mycotoxin contamination relative to single application.

Treatment
double applicatione0
Interactor
FusariumFusariumt0pathogen
Outcome
mycotoxin contaminatione0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
single applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium
Fusarium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mycotoxin contamination was lower with double application than with single application of the fungicide”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 942–1045 · show in text ↑
t0

“Fusarium head blight development and mycotoxin contamination in wheat and barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–127 · show in text ↑

fungicide · Fusarium · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 3 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.