Paper · 2021 · EUREKA Life Sciences

Comparative assessment of spray nozzles efficacy in the control of fusarium head blight in the barley crops using developed quantitative PCR assay

Oleh Hrytsev; Oleg Liudvinovskyi; Julia Shevchenko; et al.

7
claims
16
verbatim quotes
2
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Fusarium species infect cereal spikes during anthesis and cause Fusarium head blight (FHB), a destructive disease of cereal crops with worldwide economic relevance. The necessity for these phytopathogenic fungi effective control becomes increasingly important for the production of both cultivated plants and those plants seeds. Fungicide application is a key methodology for controlling the disease development and mycotoxin contamination in cereals. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is currently the most commonly admitted DNA-based technology for specific, rapid and precise Fusarium detection. We have developed and patented the method for detection and quantitative determination of phytopathogenic fungi F. avenaceum and F. graminearum in plant seeds using Real-Time PCR with a pair of primers, designed to amplify sequences of the internal transcribed spacer at the ribosomal RNA gene cluster of those phytopathogenic fungi. This study was aimed to perform a comparative assessment of the efficacy of different spray nozzles for antifungal treatment to control F. avenaceum and F. graminearum infection of barley grains using a developed qPCR diagnostic system. A single application of a fungicide (active ingredient's content: 250 g/l propiconazole, 80 g/l cyproconazole) at BBCH 65 (middle of flowering) was carried out. For this purpose, four spray nozzles with different technical characteristics were used: Flat Fan 030, Amistar 030, Defy 3D 030 and Vegetable 060 (Pentair, USA). DNA-based fungi detection and identification was performed using conventional PCR and developed qPCR. The level of mycotoxins in barley grain was determined using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Grain count in the ear of barley and thousand seed weight (TSW) were also examined. A single application of the fungicide inhibited the development of FHB and is accompanied by the slight increase of TSW values in treated plants. It was found, that the most effective fungicide was against F. avenaceum and F. graminearum. The inhibitory effect depended on sprayer type. According to qPCR results, the best performance was achieved when using Amistar 030 and Flat Fan (FF) 030 sprayers. The average concentration of deoxynivalenol (DON) content in all barley grain samples were up to 4 times higher than the permissible level. Overall, because of the high contamination levels, found in tested samples, it is possible to state that a single application of the fungicide at the flowering phase was not able to effectively reduce DON contamination in barley samples. The developed test-system for qPCR provides new important information in the study of the effectiveness of fungicides and development of strategies to control FHB in cereals, not achievable with conventional PCR.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A single fungicide application inhibited barley Fusarium head blight.

Treatment
A single application of the fungicidee0
Interactor
FusariumFusariume1pathogen
Outcome
development of FHBe0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium
Fusarium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A single application of the fungicide inhibited the development of FHB”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1781–1851 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fusarium species infect cereal spikes during anthesis and cause Fusarium head blight (FHB)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–90 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A single fungicide application slightly increased barley thousand seed weight.

Treatment
A single application of the fungicidee0
Outcome
TSW valuese0
Direction
increasee0
Qualifier
slighte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A single application of the fungicide inhibited the development of FHB and is accompanied by the slight increase of TSW values in treated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1781–1925 · show in text ↑
e1

“thousand seed weight (TSW)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1734–1760 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–107 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inhibitory effect on Fusarium infection depended on sprayer type.

Treatment
sprayer typee0
Interactor
F. avenaceum and F. graminearumFusarium graminearumFusarium avenaceume1pathogen
Outcome
inhibitory effecte0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium graminearum
Fusarium graminearum · InteractorScot Nelson from Honolulu, USA · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium avenaceum
Fusarium avenaceum · InteractorGlimmerpilzchen · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The inhibitory effect depended on sprayer type”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2020–2066 · show in text ↑
e1

“F. avenaceum and F. graminearum infection of barley grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1067–1125 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Amistar 030 and Flat Fan 030 sprayers performed best in qPCR assessment of barley Fusarium control.

Treatment
Amistar 030 and Flat Fan (FF) 030 sprayerse0
Interactor
F. avenaceum and F. graminearumFusarium graminearumFusarium avenaceume1pathogen
Outcome
best performancee0
Direction
beste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium graminearum
Fusarium graminearum · InteractorScot Nelson from Honolulu, USA · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium avenaceum
Fusarium avenaceum · InteractorGlimmerpilzchen · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“According to qPCR results, the best performance was achieved when using Amistar 030 and Flat Fan (FF) 030 sprayers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2068–2182 · show in text ↑
e1

“F. avenaceum and F. graminearum infection of barley grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1067–1125 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–107 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Average DON concentration in barley grain samples reached up to four times the permissible level.

Outcome
concentration of deoxynivalenol (DON) contente0
Direction
highere0
Value
up to 4 timese0
Comparator
permissible levele0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The average concentration of deoxynivalenol (DON) content in all barley grain samples were up to 4 times higher than the permissible level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2184–2322 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors concluded that one fungicide application at flowering did not effectively reduce DON contamination in barley.

Treatment
a single application of the fungicide at the flowering phasee0
Outcome
DON contaminatione0
Direction
not able to effectively reducee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a single application of the fungicide at the flowering phase was not able to effectively reduce DON contamination in barley samples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2429–2560 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The developed qPCR system supplied fungicide efficacy information unavailable from conventional PCR.

Outcome
new important information in the study of the effectiveness of fungicidese0
Comparator
conventional PCRe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The developed test-system for qPCR provides new important information in the study of the effectiveness of fungicides and development of strategies to control FHB in cereals, not achievable with conventional PCR”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2562–2773 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–107 · show in text ↑

fungicide · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results differ

61 papers: 54 positive, 7 negative or no effect

53 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

application · Fusarium graminearum · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

fungicide · Fusarium · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 3 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

stage · disease · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 5 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

fungicide · disease · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

32 papers: 28 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

28 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.