Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Reduced seedborne fusarium did not lead to greater emergence or better stands in the 1986 field trial.

A claim from Scab of Wheat and Barley in Southern Idaho and Evaluation of Seed Treatments for Eradication of Fusarium spp. · 1989

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced seedborne fusarium did not lead to greater emergence or better stands in the 1986 field trial.

Treatment
Fungicidal seed treatmentse0
Interactor
fusariumFusariume0pathogen
Outcome
seedling emergence or better standse0
Direction
did not result in greatere0
Qualifier
1986e0
Setting
field triale0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium
Fusarium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fungicidal seed treatments were evaluated for eradication of seedborne fusarium and prevention of the seed decay and seedling blight phases of the disease; levels of seedborne fusarium were substantially reduced, but this did not result in greater seedling emergence or better stands in a field trial in 1986”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 153–461
t0

“Wheat and Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 8–24

Title

Scab of Wheat and Barley in Southern Idaho and Evaluation of Seed Treatments for Eradication of Fusarium spp.

Laura Mihuta- Grimm Plant Disease 1989. doi:10.1094/pd-73-0769

Other claims from this paper (2)

Record rev-e29d438f4f775e3274f086cb1754d07fe880d9a6ea8da3457c47a2538869e2b8 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

fungicide · Fusarium · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

28 papers: 22 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this claim · 22 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

seed treatment · Fusarium · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
See all 3 papers →

fungicide · Fusarium · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 3 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. no effect
  5. negative
See all 6 papers →

3 of 4 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.