Paper · 1988 · American Journal of Botany

COMPETITION BETWEEN SCHIZACHYRIUM SCOPARIUM AND PROSOPIS GLANDULOSA

O. W. Van Auken; J. K. Bush

7
claims
7
verbatim quotes
32
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A competition experiment was carried out in a greenhouse with Schizachyrium scoparium (Michx.) Nash (little bluestem) and seedlings of Prosopis glandulosa Torr. (honey mesquite). The effect of S. scoparium density on the growth of P. glandulosa and the effect of a single P. glandulosa seedling on the growth of various densities of S. scoparium were examined. When P. glandulosa was grown with S. scoparium , there was a significant decrease in P. glandulosa above‐, belowground, and total dry weight at all S. scoparium densities tested. In contrast, P. glandulosa did not cause a significant reduction in S. scoparium dry weight. Root: shoot ratios for both P. glandulosa and S. scoparium increased almost three times from lowest to highest grass density. The number and length of flowering stalks of S. scoparium per plant decreased with increasing density. The presence of P. glandulosa caused a slight nonsignificant reduction of the number and length of S. scoparium flowering stalks. Establishment of P. glandulosa and other woody legumes would probably be low in high glass density and highly productive grasslands.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grass competition significantly reduced mesquite aboveground, belowground, and total dry weight at all tested grass densities.

Taxon
P. glandulosaNeltuma glandulosae0
Treatment
grown with S. scopariume0
Interactor
S. scopariumSchizachyrium scopariume0weed
Outcome
P. glandulosa above‐, belowground, and total dry weighte0
Direction
decreasee0
Qualifier
at all S. scoparium densities testede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Neltuma glandulosa
Neltuma glandulosa · TaxonDon A.W. Carlson · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Schizachyrium scoparium
Schizachyrium scoparium · InteractorPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When P. glandulosa was grown with S. scoparium , there was a significant decrease in P. glandulosa above‐, belowground, and total dry weight at all S. scoparium densities tested.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 361–539 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mesquite did not significantly reduce grass dry weight.

Taxon
S. scopariumSchizachyrium scopariume0
Treatment
P. glandulosae0
Interactor
P. glandulosaNeltuma glandulosae0weed
Outcome
S. scoparium dry weighte0
Direction
did not cause a significant reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Schizachyrium scoparium
Schizachyrium scoparium · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Neltuma glandulosa
Neltuma glandulosa · InteractorDon A.W. Carlson · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In contrast, P. glandulosa did not cause a significant reduction in S. scoparium dry weight.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 540–632 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mesquite root to shoot ratio rose almost threefold from the lowest to the highest grass density.

Taxon
P. glandulosaNeltuma glandulosae0
Interactor
S. scopariumSchizachyrium scopariume0weed
Outcome
Root: shoot ratiose0
Direction
increasede0
Value
almost three timese0
Comparator
lowest to highest grass densitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Neltuma glandulosa
Neltuma glandulosa · TaxonDon A.W. Carlson · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Schizachyrium scoparium
Schizachyrium scoparium · InteractorPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Root: shoot ratios for both P. glandulosa and S. scoparium increased almost three times from lowest to highest grass density.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 633–758 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grass root to shoot ratio rose almost threefold from the lowest to the highest grass density.

Taxon
S. scopariumSchizachyrium scopariume0
Outcome
Root: shoot ratiose0
Direction
increasede0
Value
almost three timese0
Comparator
lowest to highest grass densitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Schizachyrium scoparium
Schizachyrium scoparium · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Root: shoot ratios for both P. glandulosa and S. scoparium increased almost three times from lowest to highest grass density.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 633–758 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grass flowering stalk number and length fell as density increased.

Taxon
S. scopariumSchizachyrium scopariume0
Organ / stage
flowering stalkse0
Outcome
number and length of flowering stalkse0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
increasing densitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Schizachyrium scoparium
Schizachyrium scoparium · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The number and length of flowering stalks of S. scoparium per plant decreased with increasing density.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 759–861 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mesquite presence caused a slight, nonsignificant reduction in grass flowering stalk number and length.

Taxon
S. scopariumSchizachyrium scopariume0
Treatment
presence of P. glandulosae0
Interactor
P. glandulosaNeltuma glandulosae0weed
Outcome
number and length of S. scoparium flowering stalkse0
Direction
reductione0
Qualifier
slight nonsignificante0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Schizachyrium scoparium
Schizachyrium scoparium · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Neltuma glandulosa
Neltuma glandulosa · InteractorDon A.W. Carlson · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The presence of P. glandulosa caused a slight nonsignificant reduction of the number and length of S. scoparium flowering stalks.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 862–991 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors predict low establishment of mesquite and other woody legumes in high-density, productive grasslands.

Taxon
P. glandulosaNeltuma glandulosae0
Outcome
Establishmente0
Direction
lowe0
Qualifier
probablye0
Setting
high glass density and highly productive grasslandse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Neltuma glandulosa
Neltuma glandulosa · TaxonDon A.W. Carlson · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Establishment of P. glandulosa and other woody legumes would probably be low in high glass density and highly productive grasslands.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 992–1124 · show in text ↑

Schizachyrium scoparium · growth · Neltuma glandulosa (honey mesquite)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Neltuma glandulosa · growth · Schizachyrium scopariumResults agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.