Paper · 1995 · Crop Science

Mowing Height and Vertical Mowing Frequency Effects on Putting Green Quality

T. A. Salaiz; G. L. Horst; R. C. Shearman

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
50
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Lowering mowing heights to increase creeping bentgrass ( Agrostis palustris Huds.) putting green speed (i.e., ball roll distance) is a common practice. This practice can increase turfgrass susceptibility to heat and drought stress. Other cultural practices might be used to improve putting green quality and speed without additional stress. In this study, vertical mowing was used as a grooming technique to potentially improve putting green quality and speed. A ‘Penncross’ creeping bentgrass turf, established in 1986, was mowed daily at 3.2, 4.0, and 4.8 mm in combination with vertical mowing frequency treatments of 1 and 2 times per month, and a check of no vertical mowing. Mowing height and vertical mowing frequency effects on ball roll distance, turfgrass color and quality, and root production were evaluated in this study during 1989 and 1990. Vertical mowing treatments did not affect ball roll distance, turfgrass color and quality, or root production. Ball roll distance decreased by 0.2 m in 1989 and 0.4 m in 1990 as mowing height increased from 3.2 to 4.8 mm. Relative putting green speeds were rated as fast (i.e., > 2.6 m) across mowing height in 1989, and medium‐fast to fast (i.e. 2.3–2.6 m) in 1990. Turfgrass color, quality, and root production increased with mowing height in 1989 and 1.0 unit in 1990. Turfgrass quality increased by 0.4 rating unit per mm increase in mowing height in 1989 and 1.0 unit in 1990. Root production at two soil depths of 75 to 150 mm and 150 to 225 mm increased with mowing height in 1990.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vertical mowing did not affect ball roll distance, turfgrass color and quality, or root production.

Taxon
creeping bentgrassAgrostis stoloniferae1
Treatment
Vertical mowing treatmentse0
Outcome
ball roll distance, turfgrass color and quality, or root productione0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agrostis stolonifera
Agrostis stolonifera · TaxonAlfred · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Vertical mowing treatments did not affect ball roll distance, turfgrass color and quality, or root production.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 856–966 · show in text ↑
e1

“creeping bentgrass ( Agrostis palustris Huds.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 36–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ball roll distance decreased by 0.2 m in 1989 as mowing height increased.

Taxon
creeping bentgrassAgrostis stoloniferae1
Treatment
mowing height increased from 3.2 to 4.8 mme0
Outcome
Ball roll distancee0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
0.2 me0
Qualifier
1989e0
Comparator
3.2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agrostis stolonifera
Agrostis stolonifera · TaxonAlfred · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ball roll distance decreased by 0.2 m in 1989 and 0.4 m in 1990 as mowing height increased from 3.2 to 4.8 mm.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 967–1077 · show in text ↑
e1

“creeping bentgrass ( Agrostis palustris Huds.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 36–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ball roll distance decreased by 0.4 m in 1990 as mowing height increased.

Taxon
creeping bentgrassAgrostis stoloniferae1
Treatment
mowing height increased from 3.2 to 4.8 mme0
Outcome
Ball roll distancee0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
0.4 me0
Qualifier
1990e0
Comparator
3.2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agrostis stolonifera
Agrostis stolonifera · TaxonAlfred · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ball roll distance decreased by 0.2 m in 1989 and 0.4 m in 1990 as mowing height increased from 3.2 to 4.8 mm.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 967–1077 · show in text ↑
e1

“creeping bentgrass ( Agrostis palustris Huds.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 36–82 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Putting green speeds were fast across mowing heights in 1989.

Taxon
creeping bentgrassAgrostis stoloniferae1
Outcome
Relative putting green speedse0
Value
> 2.6 me0
Qualifier
1989e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agrostis stolonifera
Agrostis stolonifera · TaxonAlfred · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Relative putting green speeds were rated as fast (i.e., > 2.6 m) across mowing height in 1989”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1078–1171 · show in text ↑
e1

“creeping bentgrass ( Agrostis palustris Huds.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 36–82 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Putting green speeds were medium-fast to fast in 1990.

Taxon
creeping bentgrassAgrostis stoloniferae1
Outcome
medium‐fast to faste0
Value
2.3–2.6 me0
Qualifier
1990e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agrostis stolonifera
Agrostis stolonifera · TaxonAlfred · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“medium‐fast to fast (i.e. 2.3–2.6 m) in 1990”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1177–1221 · show in text ↑
e1

“creeping bentgrass ( Agrostis palustris Huds.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 36–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Turfgrass color increased with mowing height in 1989.

Taxon
creeping bentgrassAgrostis stoloniferae1
Treatment
mowing heighte0
Outcome
Turfgrass colore0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agrostis stolonifera
Agrostis stolonifera · TaxonAlfred · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Turfgrass color, quality, and root production increased with mowing height in 1989”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1223–1305 · show in text ↑
e1

“creeping bentgrass ( Agrostis palustris Huds.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 36–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Turfgrass quality increased 0.4 rating unit per mm increase in mowing height in 1989.

Taxon
creeping bentgrassAgrostis stoloniferae1
Treatment
mowing heighte0
Outcome
Turfgrass qualitye0
Direction
increasede0
Value
0.4 rating unit per mme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agrostis stolonifera
Agrostis stolonifera · TaxonAlfred · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Turfgrass quality increased by 0.4 rating unit per mm increase in mowing height in 1989”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1328–1415 · show in text ↑
e1

“creeping bentgrass ( Agrostis palustris Huds.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 36–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Turfgrass quality increased 1.0 unit in 1990 with mowing height.

Taxon
creeping bentgrassAgrostis stoloniferae1
Treatment
mowing heighte0
Outcome
Turfgrass qualitye0
Direction
increasede0
Value
1.0 unite0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agrostis stolonifera
Agrostis stolonifera · TaxonAlfred · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Turfgrass quality increased by 0.4 rating unit per mm increase in mowing height in 1989 and 1.0 unit in 1990”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1328–1436 · show in text ↑
e1

“creeping bentgrass ( Agrostis palustris Huds.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 36–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root production at both reported soil depths increased with mowing height in 1990.

Taxon
creeping bentgrassAgrostis stoloniferae1
Treatment
mowing heighte0
Outcome
Root productione0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
75 to 150 mm and 150 to 225 mme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agrostis stolonifera
Agrostis stolonifera · TaxonAlfred · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Root production at two soil depths of 75 to 150 mm and 150 to 225 mm increased with mowing height in 1990”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1438–1543 · show in text ↑
e1

“creeping bentgrass ( Agrostis palustris Huds.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 36–82 · show in text ↑

pruning · yield · Agrostis stolonifera (creeping bent grass)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

pruning · quality: general · Agrostis stolonifera (creeping bent grass)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

pruning · quality: postharvest · Agrostis stolonifera (creeping bent grass)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.