Paper · 2014 · Agriculture Forestry and Fisheries

Influence of Small Cereal Intercropping and Additive Series of Seed Proportion on the Yield and Yield Component of Lupine (Lupinus Spp.) in North Western Ethiopia

Yayeh Bitew

7
claims
7
verbatim quotes
5
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Small cereals as a main crop and lupine as a minor crop are food crops often traditionally grown in association in North Western Ethiopia. The experiment was conducted on intercropping of lupine (Lupinus albus L.) with wheat (Triticum aestivum), barley (Hordeum vulgar) and finger millet (Eleusine coracana) in 2009 at Adet Agricultural research station. The treatments were sole wheat at a seed rate of 175 kg/ ha, sole barley at a seed rate of 125 kg/ ha, sole finger millet at a seed rate of 30 kg/ ha, sole lupine at a seed rate of 90 kg/ ha, and an additive series of 25, 50 and 75 % of the sole lupine seed rate combined with the full cereal seed rate to determine the effect of small cereal intercropping in additive series on the yield and yield component of lupine. The experimental design was a completely randomized block with nine intercropping and four sole cropping systems in three replications. Lupine was planted in rows after establishment of main crops. SAS software’s were used to compute the analysis of variance. Maximum lupine seed proportion was superior to the lowest when intercropped with wheat and finger millet. The lowest population density resulted in reduced agronomic attributes of lupine. Intercropping higher proportion of lupine with wheat and finger millet did help much in increasing grain yield and biomass yield of lupine without affecting cereal crop yield. However, nearly complete dominance of barley over lupine at all seeding ratios leads to absolute reduction in grain yield. The lupine-finger millet mixture at the 50:100 and 75:100 seeding ratio and lupine-wheat mixture at the 75:100 seeding ratio had a higher yield advantage of intercropping for exploiting the resources of the environment compared with the other intercropping systems.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maximum lupine seed proportion was superior to the lowest proportion when intercropped with wheat and finger millet.

Taxon
lupinee1
Treatment
intercropped with wheat and finger millete1
Outcome
superiore1
Direction
superiore1
Qualifier
Maximum lupine seed proportione1
Comparator
the loweste1

Verbatim

e1

“Maximum lupine seed proportion was superior to the lowest when intercropped with wheat and finger millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1035–1139 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The lowest population density reduced agronomic attributes of lupine.

Taxon
lupinee2
Treatment
lowest population densitye2
Outcome
agronomic attributese2
Direction
reducede2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e2

“The lowest population density resulted in reduced agronomic attributes of lupine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1141–1221 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping a higher proportion of lupine with wheat and finger millet increased grain yield and biomass yield of lupine.

Taxon
lupinee3
Treatment
Intercropping higher proportion of lupine with wheat and finger millete3
Outcome
grain yield and biomass yielde3
Direction
increasinge3

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e3

“Intercropping higher proportion of lupine with wheat and finger millet did help much in increasing grain yield and biomass yield of lupine without affecting cereal crop yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1223–1397 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping a higher proportion of lupine with wheat and finger millet did not affect cereal crop yield.

Taxon
wheat and finger milletEleusine coracanaTriticum aestivume3
Treatment
Intercropping higher proportion of lupine with wheat and finger millete3
Outcome
cereal crop yielde3
Direction
without affectinge3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Intercropping higher proportion of lupine with wheat and finger millet did help much in increasing grain yield and biomass yield of lupine without affecting cereal crop yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1223–1397 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nearly complete dominance of barley over lupine at all seeding ratios reduced lupine grain yield.

Taxon
lupinee5
Treatment
barley over lupine at all seeding ratiose5
Outcome
grain yielde5
Direction
reductione5

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e5

“nearly complete dominance of barley over lupine at all seeding ratios leads to absolute reduction in grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1408–1520 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The lupine-finger millet mixture at 50:100 and 75:100 seeding ratios had a higher yield advantage of intercropping than the other intercropping systems.

Taxon
lupinee6
Treatment
lupine-finger millet mixture at the 50:100 and 75:100 seeding ratioe6
Outcome
yield advantage of intercroppinge6
Direction
highere6
Comparator
other intercropping systemse6

Verbatim

e6

“The lupine-finger millet mixture at the 50:100 and 75:100 seeding ratio and lupine-wheat mixture at the 75:100 seeding ratio had a higher yield advantage of intercropping for exploiting the resources of the environment compared with the other intercropping systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1522–1786 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The lupine-wheat mixture at 75:100 seeding ratio had a higher yield advantage of intercropping than the other intercropping systems.

Taxon
lupinee6
Treatment
lupine-wheat mixture at the 75:100 seeding ratioe6
Outcome
yield advantage of intercroppinge6
Direction
highere6
Comparator
other intercropping systemse6

Verbatim

e6

“The lupine-finger millet mixture at the 50:100 and 75:100 seeding ratio and lupine-wheat mixture at the 75:100 seeding ratio had a higher yield advantage of intercropping for exploiting the resources of the environment compared with the other intercropping systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1522–1786 · show in text ↑

intercropping · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

189 papers: 131 positive, 58 negative or no effect

57 papers in the same direction as this paper · 131 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

185 papers more in this group

See all 189 papers →

intercropping · yield · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Positive and negative results

32 papers: 29 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 29 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

28 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.