Paper · 2016 · Frontiers in Plant Science

Impact of Wheat/Faba Bean Mixed Cropping or Rotation Systems on Soil Microbial Functionalities

Sanâa Wahbi; Yves Prin; Jean Thioulouse; et al.

3
claims
6
verbatim quotes
86
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Cropping systems based on carefully designed species mixtures reveal many potential advantages in terms of enhancing crop productivity, reducing pest and diseases, and enhancing ecological services. Associating cereals and legume production either through intercropping or rotations might be a relevant strategy of producing both type of culture, while benefiting from combined nitrogen fixed by the legume through its symbiotic association with nitrogen-fixing bacteria, and from a better use of P and water through mycorrhizal associations. These practices also participate to the diversification of agricultural productions, enabling to secure the regularity of income returns across the seasonal and climatic uncertainties. In this context, we designed a field experiment aiming to estimate the 2 years impact of these practices on wheat yield and on soil microbial activities as estimated through Substrate Induced Respiration method and mycorrhizal soil infectivity (MSI) measurement. It is expected that understanding soil microbial functionalities in response to these agricultural practices might allows to target the best type of combination, in regard to crop productivity. We found that the tested cropping systems largely impacted soil microbial functionalities and MSI. Intercropping gave better results in terms of crop productivity than the rotation practice after two cropping seasons. Benefits resulting from intercrop should be highly linked with changes recorded on soil microbial functionalities.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cropping systems affected soil microbial functionalities and MSI.

Taxon
Wheat/Faba BeanVicia fabaTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
soil microbial functionalities and MSIe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the tested cropping systems largely impacted soil microbial functionalities and MSI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1199–1282 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat/Faba Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–25 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping gave greater crop productivity than rotation after two seasons.

Taxon
Wheat/Faba BeanVicia fabaTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Intercroppinge0
Outcome
crop productivitye0
Direction
bettere0
Qualifier
after two cropping seasonse0
Comparator
rotation practicee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Intercropping gave better results in terms of crop productivity than the rotation practice after two cropping seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1284–1401 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat/Faba Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–25 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors link intercropping benefits to changes in soil microbial functionalities.

Taxon
Wheat/Faba BeanVicia fabaTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
Benefits resulting from intercrope0
Qualifier
changes recorded on soil microbial functionalitiese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Benefits resulting from intercrop should be highly linked with changes recorded on soil microbial functionalities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1403–1516 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat/Faba Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–25 · show in text ↑

intercropping · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

189 papers: 131 positive, 58 negative or no effect

130 papers in the same direction as this paper · 51 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

185 papers more in this group

See all 189 papers →

intercropping · yield · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results

73 papers: 59 positive, 14 negative or no effect

58 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

69 papers more in this group

See all 73 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.