Abstract
Cropping systems based on carefully designed species mixtures reveal many potential advantages in terms of enhancing crop productivity, reducing pest and diseases, and enhancing ecological services. Associating cereals and legume production either through intercropping or rotations might be a relevant strategy of producing both type of culture, while benefiting from combined nitrogen fixed by the legume through its symbiotic association with nitrogen-fixing bacteria, and from a better use of P and water through mycorrhizal associations. These practices also participate to the diversification of agricultural productions, enabling to secure the regularity of income returns across the seasonal and climatic uncertainties. In this context, we designed a field experiment aiming to estimate the 2 years impact of these practices on wheat yield and on soil microbial activities as estimated through Substrate Induced Respiration method and mycorrhizal soil infectivity (MSI) measurement. It is expected that understanding soil microbial functionalities in response to these agricultural practices might allows to target the best type of combination, in regard to crop productivity. We found that the tested cropping systems largely impacted soil microbial functionalities and MSI. Intercropping gave better results in terms of crop productivity than the rotation practice after two cropping seasons. Benefits resulting from intercrop should be highly linked with changes recorded on soil microbial functionalities.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 3
Claim · model-written summary
Cropping systems affected soil microbial functionalities and MSI.
- Taxon
- Wheat/Faba Bean
Vicia faba
Triticum aestivumt0 - Outcome
- soil microbial functionalities and MSIe0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.


Verbatim
e0“the tested cropping systems largely impacted soil microbial functionalities and MSI”
t0“Wheat/Faba Bean”
Claim · model-written summary
Intercropping gave greater crop productivity than rotation after two seasons.
- Taxon
- Wheat/Faba Bean
Vicia faba
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- Intercroppinge0
- Outcome
- crop productivitye0
- Direction
- bettere0
- Qualifier
- after two cropping seasonse0
- Comparator
- rotation practicee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.


Verbatim
e0“Intercropping gave better results in terms of crop productivity than the rotation practice after two cropping seasons”
t0“Wheat/Faba Bean”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors link intercropping benefits to changes in soil microbial functionalities.
- Taxon
- Wheat/Faba Bean
Vicia faba
Triticum aestivumt0 - Outcome
- Benefits resulting from intercrope0
- Qualifier
- changes recorded on soil microbial functionalitiese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.


Verbatim
e0“Benefits resulting from intercrop should be highly linked with changes recorded on soil microbial functionalities”
t0“Wheat/Faba Bean”
The same questions in other papers
intercropping · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ
130 papers in the same direction as this paper · 51 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- negative
- negative
185 papers more in this group
See all 189 papers →intercropping · yield · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results
58 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- no effect
- negative
69 papers more in this group
See all 73 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.