Paper · 1989 · Journal of Phytopathology

Effects of Soil Solarization on Fusarium Wilt of Chickpea

D. K. Arora; A. K. Pandey

9
claims
20
verbatim quotes
15
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract The effect of soil solarization on chickpea wilt, caused by Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceri , was examined during the summer of 1985 and 1986. Preplant solarization for 45 days in 1985 significantly ( P = 0.5) decreased the incidence of wilt in two subsequent chickpea crops. Additional solarization of sub‐plots of the same soil during the summer of 1986 further reduced the disease and the pathogen. Yield and nodulation in the solarized plots were significantly ( P = 0.05) higher than untreated plots. No pronounced differences in maximum temperature, percentage of diseased plants, plant height at maturity, and xylem discoloration indices were observed between solarized irrigated and non‐irrigated treatments. However, the above parameters differed significantly ( P = 0.05) between solarized irrigated and nonsolarized non‐irrigated soil. Solarization significantly reduced both the population of F. oxysporum f. sp. ciceri , and viability of conidia and chlamydospores. These reductions were proportional to soil temperatures achieved during solarization. Zusammenfassung Der Einfluß einer Bodensolarisation auf die Fusarium ‐Welke bei Kichererbsen Im Sommer 1985 und 1986 wurde der Einfluß einer Bodensolarisation auf die Kichererbsenwelke, verursacht durch Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceri, beobachtet. Eine Präpflanzensolarisation über 45 Tage in 1985 verringert das Auftreten einer Welke in zwei nachfolgenden Kichererbsenbeständen deutlich ( P = 0,5). Eine zusätzliche Solarisation von einigen Parzellen innerhalb dieser Fläche während des Sommers 1986 reduzierte die Krankheit und den Krankheitserreger weiter. Der Ertrag und die Knöllchenbildung in solarisierten Parzellen waren deutlich ( P = 0,05) größer als in unbehan‐delten Parzellen. Signifikante Unterschiede der maximalen Temperatur, Prozentsatz erkrankte Pflanzen, Pflanzengröße bei der Reife, und Xylemverfärbung wurden zwischen solarisierten, bewässerten und nichtbewässerten Behandlungen nicht beobachtet. Jedoch unterschieden sich diese Parameter deutlich ( P = 0,05) zwischen soiarisierten, bewässerten und nichtsolarisierten, nichtbewässerten Behandlungen. Eine Solarisation senkte sowohl die F. oxysporum f. sp. acm‐Population als auch die Lebensfähigkeit von Konidien und Chlamydosporen deutlich. Diese Reduzierungen waren proportional zu den Bodentemperaturen, die während der Solarisation erreicht wurden.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Preplant solarization for 45 days in 1985 decreased wilt incidence in two subsequent chickpea crops.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Preplant solarization for 45 days in 1985e0
Interactor
Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceriFusarium oxysporume1pathogen
Outcome
incidence of wilte0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
P = 0.5e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium oxysporum
Fusarium oxysporum · InteractorClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Fusarium Wilt of Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–57 · show in text ↑
e0

“Preplant solarization for 45 days in 1985 significantly ( P = 0.5) decreased the incidence of wilt in two subsequent chickpea crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 153–284 · show in text ↑
e1

“chickpea wilt, caused by Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceri”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 44–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

An additional solarization in 1986 further reduced the disease and the pathogen.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Additional solarization of sub‐plots of the same soil during the summer of 1986e0
Interactor
Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceriFusarium oxysporume1pathogen
Outcome
disease and the pathogene0
Direction
further reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium oxysporum
Fusarium oxysporum · InteractorClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Fusarium Wilt of Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–57 · show in text ↑
e0

“Additional solarization of sub‐plots of the same soil during the summer of 1986 further reduced the disease and the pathogen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 286–410 · show in text ↑
e1

“chickpea wilt, caused by Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceri”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 44–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield and nodulation were higher in solarized plots than in untreated plots.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
solarized plotse0
Outcome
Yield and nodulatione0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
P = 0.05e0
Comparator
untreated plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Fusarium Wilt of Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–57 · show in text ↑
e0

“Yield and nodulation in the solarized plots were significantly ( P = 0.05) higher than untreated plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 412–514 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maximum temperature, percentage of diseased plants and plant height at maturity showed no pronounced differences between solarized irrigated and non-irrigated treatments.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
solarized irrigatede0
Outcome
maximum temperature, percentage of diseased plants, plant height at maturitye0
Direction
No pronounced differencese0
Comparator
non‐irrigated treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Fusarium Wilt of Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–57 · show in text ↑
e0

“No pronounced differences in maximum temperature, percentage of diseased plants, plant height at maturity, and xylem discoloration indices were observed between solarized irrigated and non‐irrigated treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 516–725 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Xylem discoloration indices showed no pronounced difference between solarized irrigated and non-irrigated treatments.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
solarized irrigatede0
Outcome
xylem discoloration indicese0
Direction
No pronounced differencese0
Comparator
non‐irrigated treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Fusarium Wilt of Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–57 · show in text ↑
e0

“No pronounced differences in maximum temperature, percentage of diseased plants, plant height at maturity, and xylem discoloration indices were observed between solarized irrigated and non‐irrigated treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 516–725 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The above parameters differed significantly between solarized irrigated and nonsolarized non-irrigated soil.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
solarized irrigatede0
Outcome
above parameterse0
Qualifier
P = 0.05e0
Comparator
nonsolarized non‐irrigated soile0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Fusarium Wilt of Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–57 · show in text ↑
e0

“However, the above parameters differed significantly ( P = 0.05) between solarized irrigated and nonsolarized non‐irrigated soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–855 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Solarization significantly reduced the population of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceri.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Solarizatione0
Interactor
F. oxysporum f. sp. ciceriFusarium oxysporume0pathogen
Outcome
population of F. oxysporum f. sp. cicerie0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium oxysporum
Fusarium oxysporum · InteractorClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Fusarium Wilt of Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–57 · show in text ↑
e0

“Solarization significantly reduced both the population of F. oxysporum f. sp. ciceri , and viability of conidia and chlamydospores”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 857–987 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Solarization significantly reduced the viability of conidia and chlamydospores of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceri.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Solarizatione0
Interactor
F. oxysporum f. sp. ciceriFusarium oxysporume0pathogen
Outcome
viability of conidia and chlamydosporese0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium oxysporum
Fusarium oxysporum · InteractorClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Fusarium Wilt of Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–57 · show in text ↑
e0

“Solarization significantly reduced both the population of F. oxysporum f. sp. ciceri , and viability of conidia and chlamydospores”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 857–987 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reductions in the pathogen were proportional to the soil temperatures achieved during solarization.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
soil temperatures achieved during solarizatione0
Outcome
reductionse0
Direction
proportionale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Fusarium Wilt of Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–57 · show in text ↑
e0

“These reductions were proportional to soil temperatures achieved during solarization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 989–1073 · show in text ↑

irrigation · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

41 papers: 27 positive, 14 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 27 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

37 papers more in this group

See all 41 papers →

solarization · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

solarization · Fusarium oxysporum · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.