Paper · 1964 · Weed Research

HERBICIDE MIXTURES FOR WEED CONTROL IN PEANUTS (ARACHIS HYPOGAEA L.), 1961–63*

E. W. HAUSER; S. A. PARHAM

9
claims
14
verbatim quotes
10
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Summary. Comparative studies of herbicides and herbicide mixtures in peanuts (groundnuts) were continued at Tifton, Georgia, U.S.A., on Tifton loamy sand during 1961–63. When applied on a dry soil surface at the ‘cracking’ stage, certain mixtures which contained dinoseb as one component with 2,4‐DES, 2,4‐DEP, or DMPA as the Other component gave control of Digitaria sanguinalis (L.) Scop. and Richardia scabra St. Hil. for the entire growing season. However, on wet soils with no subsequent rain during the first weeks or with prolonged excess moisture, mixtures were not appreciably more effective than herbicides applied singly at standard rates. Where mixtures were applied on wet soil, herbicide effectiveness was improved by timely follow‐up sprays of dinoseb at 1.5 lb/ac. Timing of application was often critical for optimum weed control. The best time was when the peanuts were cracking the ground or when the first weeds were barely visible, whichever occurred first. Mixtures permitted the use of the lowest rate of each compound on the weeds for which it was most effective. A mixture of DMPA at 6 lb/ac 4—dinoseb at 3 lb/ac applied at the ‘ground‐cracking’ stage increased the average yield of peanuts. The mixtures evaluated had no effect on shelling‐%, % sound mature kernels (SMK), mean weight per nut, or % germination. Neither did they affect taste of the peanuts or other sensory. characteristics. However, preliminary chemical analyses indicated that peanuts treated with mixtures contained more linolein and less olein than did untreated peanuts. Essais d'herbicides et de mélanges herbicides pour le désherbage dans les arachides (Arachis hypogea L.), 1961–63

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dinoseb mixtures with 2,4-DES, 2,4-DEP, or DMPA controlled Digitaria sanguinalis for the season on dry soil at cracking.

Taxon
PEANUTSt0
Treatment
mixtures which contained dinoseb as one component with 2,4‐DES, 2,4‐DEP, or DMPA as the Other componente0
Interactor
Digitaria sanguinalis (L.) Scop.Digitaria sanguinalise0weed
Outcome
control of Digitaria sanguinalis (L.) Scop.e0
Qualifier
dry soil surface at the ‘cracking’ stagee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Digitaria sanguinalis
Digitaria sanguinalis · InteractorMatt Lavin from Bozeman, Montana, USA · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When applied on a dry soil surface at the ‘cracking’ stage, certain mixtures which contained dinoseb as one component with 2,4‐DES, 2,4‐DEP, or DMPA as the Other component gave control of Digitaria sanguinalis (L.) Scop. and Richardia scabra St. Hil. for the entire growing season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 170–450 · show in text ↑
t0

“PEANUTS (ARACHIS HYPOGAEA L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same mixtures controlled Richardia scabra for the season.

Taxon
PEANUTSt0
Treatment
mixtures which contained dinoseb as one component with 2,4‐DES, 2,4‐DEP, or DMPA as the Other componente0
Interactor
Richardia scabra St. Hil.Richardia scabrae0weed
Outcome
control of Digitaria sanguinalis (L.) Scop. and Richardia scabra St. Hil.e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Richardia scabra
Richardia scabra · InteractorFlorimagix · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When applied on a dry soil surface at the ‘cracking’ stage, certain mixtures which contained dinoseb as one component with 2,4‐DES, 2,4‐DEP, or DMPA as the Other component gave control of Digitaria sanguinalis (L.) Scop. and Richardia scabra St. Hil. for the entire growing season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 170–450 · show in text ↑
t0

“PEANUTS (ARACHIS HYPOGAEA L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

On wet soils, mixtures were not appreciably more effective than single herbicides.

Taxon
PEANUTSt0
Treatment
mixturese0
Outcome
effectivee0
Direction
not appreciably more effectivee0
Qualifier
wet soils with no subsequent rain during the first weeks or with prolonged excess moisturee0
Comparator
herbicides applied singly at standard ratese0

Verbatim

e0

“on wet soils with no subsequent rain during the first weeks or with prolonged excess moisture, mixtures were not appreciably more effective than herbicides applied singly at standard rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 461–649 · show in text ↑
t0

“PEANUTS (ARACHIS HYPOGAEA L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Follow-up dinoseb sprays improved effectiveness on wet soil.

Taxon
PEANUTSt0
Treatment
timely follow‐up sprays of dinoseb at 1.5 lb/ace0
Outcome
herbicide effectivenesse0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Where mixtures were applied on wet soil, herbicide effectiveness was improved by timely follow‐up sprays of dinoseb at 1.5 lb/ac”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 651–779 · show in text ↑
t0

“PEANUTS (ARACHIS HYPOGAEA L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The DMPA-dinoseb mixture increased average peanut yield.

Taxon
peanutsArachis hypogaeae0
Treatment
A mixture of DMPA at 6 lb/ac 4—dinoseb at 3 lb/ace0
Outcome
average yield of peanutse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A mixture of DMPA at 6 lb/ac 4—dinoseb at 3 lb/ac applied at the ‘ground‐cracking’ stage increased the average yield of peanuts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1088–1215 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mixtures had no effect on shelling percentage, sound mature kernels, nut weight or germination.

Taxon
PEANUTSt0
Treatment
mixturese0
Outcome
shelling‐%, % sound mature kernels (SMK), mean weight per nute0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The mixtures evaluated had no effect on shelling‐%, % sound mature kernels (SMK), mean weight per nut, or % germination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1217–1336 · show in text ↑
t0

“PEANUTS (ARACHIS HYPOGAEA L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mixtures did not affect peanut taste or other sensory characteristics.

Taxon
peanutsArachis hypogaeae0
Outcome
taste of the peanuts or other sensory. characteristicse0
Direction
Neither did they affecte0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Neither did they affect taste of the peanuts or other sensory. characteristics”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1338–1416 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treated peanuts contained more linolein than untreated peanuts.

Taxon
peanutsArachis hypogaeae0
Treatment
mixturese0
Outcome
linoleine0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
untreated peanutse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“peanuts treated with mixtures contained more linolein and less olein than did untreated peanuts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1472–1567 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treated peanuts contained less olein than untreated peanuts.

Taxon
peanutsArachis hypogaeae0
Treatment
mixturese0
Outcome
oleine0
Direction
lesse0
Comparator
untreated peanutse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“peanuts treated with mixtures contained more linolein and less olein than did untreated peanuts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1472–1567 · show in text ↑

application · molecular: metabolites · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 17 positive, 2 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.