Paper · 1999 · Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions

Relationship Between Localized Acquired Resistance (LAR) and the Hypersensitive Response (HR): HR Is Necessary for LAR to Occur and Salicylic Acid Is Not Sufficient to Trigger LAR

Laurent Costet; Sylvain Cordelier; Stéphan Dorey; et al.

7
claims
12
verbatim quotes
58
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-sa

Abstract

In tobacco plants reacting hypersensitively to pathogen infection, localized acquired resistance (LAR) is induced in a sharp zone surrounding hypersensitive response (HR) lesions. Using a fungal glycoprotein inducing HR and LAR when infiltrated at 50 nM into tobacco leaves, we have shown previously that a plant signal(s) is released by HR cells and diffuses to induce LAR. Here we address two questions: does LAR occur when HR is not induced, and is salicylic acid the (or one of the) mobile LAR signal? We found that application to tobacco leaves of 0.25 nM glycoprotein triggered defense responses without HR and without an H 2 O 2 burst. The analyzed responses include changes in expression of O-methyltransferase (OMT), 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutarylCoA reductase, pathogenesis-related (PR) proteins, and changes in levels of the signal salicylic acid. No defense responses and no increased resistance to tobacco mosaic virus infection were found beyond the elicitor-infiltrated tissue, providing strong evidence that there is no LAR without HR. Treatments of NahG tobacco leaves with 50 nM elicitor induced the HR and, in the sharp zone surrounding the HR lesion, a strong activation of OMT and of basic PR proteins, but not of acidic PR-1 proteins. This indicates that a signal different from salicylic acid is diffusing.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Application of 0.25 nM fungal glycoprotein to tobacco leaves triggered defense responses without HR and without an H2O2 burst.

Treatment
0.25 nM glycoproteine0
Outcome
defense responsese0
Direction
triggerede0
Qualifier
without HR and without an H 2 O 2 burste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application to tobacco leaves of 0.25 nM glycoprotein triggered defense responses without HR and without an H 2 O 2 burst”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 520–641 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No defense responses and no increased resistance to tobacco mosaic virus infection were found beyond the elicitor-infiltrated tissue.

Interactor
tobacco mosaic virusTobacco mosaic viruse0pathogen
Outcome
defense responses and no increased resistance to tobacco mosaic virus infectione0
Qualifier
beyond the elicitor-infiltrated tissuee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Tobacco mosaic virus
Tobacco mosaic virus · InteractorFrank Vincentz · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No defense responses and no increased resistance to tobacco mosaic virus infection were found beyond the elicitor-infiltrated tissue”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 855–987 · show in text ↑
e1

“application to tobacco leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 520–549 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that localized acquired resistance does not occur without the hypersensitive response.

Outcome
LARe0
Qualifier
no LAR without HRe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there is no LAR without HR”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1020–1046 · show in text ↑
e1

“tobacco plants reacting hypersensitively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3–43 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment of NahG tobacco leaves with 50 nM elicitor induced the hypersensitive response.

Material
NahG tobaccoe0
Treatment
50 nM elicitore0
Outcome
HRe0
Direction
inducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatments of NahG tobacco leaves with 50 nM elicitor induced the HR”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1048–1116 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the sharp zone around the HR lesion of elicitor-treated NahG tobacco leaves, OMT and basic PR proteins were strongly activated.

Material
NahG tobaccoe0
Treatment
50 nM elicitore0
Gene
OMT and of basic PR proteinse1
Outcome
activation of OMT and of basic PR proteinse1
Direction
strong activatione1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatments of NahG tobacco leaves with 50 nM elicitor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1048–1101 · show in text ↑
e1

“a strong activation of OMT and of basic PR proteins”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1167–1218 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the same zone, acidic PR-1 proteins were not activated.

Material
NahG tobaccoe0
Treatment
50 nM elicitore0
Gene
acidic PR-1 proteinse1
Outcome
activatione1
Direction
no_changeinferrede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatments of NahG tobacco leaves with 50 nM elicitor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1048–1101 · show in text ↑
e1

“a strong activation of OMT and of basic PR proteins, but not of acidic PR-1 proteins”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1167–1251 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that a signal different from salicylic acid diffuses around the HR lesion.

Compound
salicylic acide0
Outcome
signal different from salicylic acid is diffusinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a signal different from salicylic acid is diffusing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1273–1324 · show in text ↑
e1

“tobacco plants reacting hypersensitively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3–43 · show in text ↑

glycoprotein · disease · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

resistance inducer · disease · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Results agree

13 papers: 13 positive, 0 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.