Abstract
Plants of wheat were cloned and the clonal units transplanted to the field. Mortality was 3 per cent in 1960 and 18 per cent in 1961. A high percentage of the clonal units retillered profusely and produced considerable grain. Differences in yield and its components between units of a clone were non-significant in 1960 but significant differences in number of heads occurred in 1961. Based on the clonal test, varietal differences in yield and its components were significant in 1960 and conformed to known performance. The clonal test established that each of the two varieties was heterogeneous for yielding ability. Significant differences in yield and its components were found between clones. In the seeded small plot test of the next generation significant differences again occurred. Correlations between clonal and small plot yield performance were highly significant.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 9
Claim · model-written summary
Clonal unit mortality was 3 per cent in 1960 and 18 per cent in 1961.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Outcome
- Mortalitye0
- Value
- 3 per cent in 1960 and 18 per cent in 1961e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“CLONAL PROPAGATION OF WHEAT PLANTS”
e0“Mortality was 3 per cent in 1960 and 18 per cent in 1961”
Claim · model-written summary
A high percentage of clonal units retillered profusely and produced considerable grain.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Material
- clonal unitse1
- Outcome
- retillered profusely and produced considerable graine1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“CLONAL PROPAGATION OF WHEAT PLANTS”
e1“A high percentage of the clonal units retillered profusely and produced considerable grain”
Claim · model-written summary
Differences in yield and its components between units of a clone were non-significant in 1960.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Outcome
- Differences in yield and its components between units of a clonee2
- Qualifier
- in 1960e2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“CLONAL PROPAGATION OF WHEAT PLANTS”
e2“Differences in yield and its components between units of a clone were non-significant in 1960”
Claim · model-written summary
Significant differences in number of heads between units of a clone occurred in 1961.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Outcome
- number of headse3
- Qualifier
- in 1961e3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“CLONAL PROPAGATION OF WHEAT PLANTS”
e3“but significant differences in number of heads occurred in 1961”
Claim · model-written summary
Varietal differences in yield and its components were significant in 1960 and conformed to known performance.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Outcome
- varietal differences in yield and its componentse4
- Qualifier
- in 1960 and conformed to known performancee4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“CLONAL PROPAGATION OF WHEAT PLANTS”
e4“varietal differences in yield and its components were significant in 1960 and conformed to known performance”
Claim · model-written summary
Each of the two varieties was heterogeneous for yielding ability.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Material
- the two varietiese5
- Outcome
- heterogeneous for yielding abilitye5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“CLONAL PROPAGATION OF WHEAT PLANTS”
e5“each of the two varieties was heterogeneous for yielding ability”
Claim · model-written summary
Significant differences in yield and its components were found between clones.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Material
- clonese6
- Outcome
- yield and its componentse6
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“CLONAL PROPAGATION OF WHEAT PLANTS”
e6“Significant differences in yield and its components were found between clones”
Claim · model-written summary
Significant differences occurred again in the seeded small plot test of the next generation.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Outcome
- significant differencese7
- Qualifier
- In the seeded small plot test of the next generatione7
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“CLONAL PROPAGATION OF WHEAT PLANTS”
e7“In the seeded small plot test of the next generation significant differences again occurred”
Claim · model-written summary
Clonal and small plot yield performance were highly significantly correlated.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Outcome
- yield performancee1
- Comparator
- small plote1
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“CLONAL PROPAGATION OF WHEAT PLANTS”
e1“Correlations between clonal and small plot yield performance were highly significant”