Abstract
SUMMARY Three field experiments studying the effect of chlormequat (CCC) on the grain yield of spring wheat and the quality of the grain for baking purposes were made. In the first, CCC applied as a spray during the stage of rapid internode elongation proved more successful than application as a mixture with superphosphate drilled with the seed at sowing. Both methods prevented lodging and the depression of yield which occurred in the control plots. In the other two experiments the sole method of CCC application was by spraying. In all three experiments CCC‐treated plots had more ears per unit area and grains per ear than control plots; the one exception being at the lowest plant density derived from a seeding rate of 24 kg/ha. CCC helped prevent weather damage to the grain and as a result baking performance of the flour from treated plots was superior to that from the untreated plots.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
CCC sprayed at rapid internode elongation was more successful than CCC mixed with superphosphate and drilled at sowing.
- Taxon
- spring wheat
Triticum aestivume3 - Treatment
- CCC applied as a spray during the stage of rapid internode elongatione1
- Outcome
- more successfule1
- Direction
- more successfule1
- Comparator
- application as a mixture with superphosphate drilled with the seed at sowinge1
- Setting
- Three field experimentse4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“CCC applied as a spray during the stage of rapid internode elongation proved more successful than application as a mixture with superphosphate drilled with the seed at sowing”
e3“chlormequat (CCC) on the grain yield of spring wheat”
e4“Three field experiments”
Claim · model-written summary
CCC prevented lodging and the depression of yield that occurred in control plots.
- Taxon
- spring wheatTriticum aestivume3
- Treatment
- CCCe1
- Outcome
- lodging and the depression of yielde2
- Direction
- preventede2
- Comparator
- control plotse2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“CCC applied as a spray during the stage of rapid internode elongation proved more successful than application as a mixture with superphosphate drilled with the seed at sowing”
e2“Both methods prevented lodging and the depression of yield which occurred in the control plots”
e3“chlormequat (CCC) on the grain yield of spring wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
CCC-treated plots had more ears per unit area and grains per ear than control plots in all but one case.
- Taxon
- spring wheatTriticum aestivume3
- Treatment
- CCCe5
- Outcome
- ears per unit area and grains per eare5
- Direction
- moree5
- Qualifier
- the one exception being at the lowest plant densitye6
- Comparator
- control plotse5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e3“chlormequat (CCC) on the grain yield of spring wheat”
e5“CCC‐treated plots had more ears per unit area and grains per ear than control plots”
e6“the one exception being at the lowest plant density derived from a seeding rate of 24 kg/ha”
Claim · model-written summary
CCC helped prevent weather damage to the grain.
- Taxon
- spring wheatTriticum aestivume3
- Organ / stage
- graine7
- Treatment
- CCCe7
- Outcome
- weather damage to the graine7
- Direction
- helped prevente7
- Comparator
- untreated plotse7
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e3“chlormequat (CCC) on the grain yield of spring wheat”
e7“CCC helped prevent weather damage to the grain and as a result baking performance of the flour from treated plots was superior to that from the untreated plots”
Claim · model-written summary
Baking performance of flour from CCC-treated plots was superior to that from untreated plots.
- Taxon
- spring wheatTriticum aestivume3
- Treatment
- CCCe7
- Outcome
- baking performance of the floure7
- Direction
- superiore7
- Comparator
- untreated plotse7
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e3“chlormequat (CCC) on the grain yield of spring wheat”
e7“CCC helped prevent weather damage to the grain and as a result baking performance of the flour from treated plots was superior to that from the untreated plots”
The same questions in other papers
chlormequat chloride · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ
52 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
67 papers more in this group
See all 71 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.