Paper · 2001 · African Crop Science Journal

The effect of crop rotation on bacterial wilt incidence and potato tuber yield

Berga Lemaga; R. Kanzikwera; R. Kakuhenzire; et al.

16
claims
29
verbatim quotes
44
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

To determine the effects of crop rotation on potato bacterial wilt incidence and tuber yields, one-and two-season rotation experiments were conducted during 1995-1999 at Kachwekano Agricultural Research and Development Centre located at an altitude of 2200 meters in southwestern Uganda. Pulses, cereals, root crops and vegetables commonly grown in the area were included in different sets of rotation experiments. Each time, prior to planting the experiment, the field was planted to a bacterial wilt susceptible potato variety and artificial inoculation was also done, when needed, to achieve a somewhat uniform distribution of Ralstonia solanacearum. A one-season rotation in heavily infested field (>90% wilt incidence) with wheat and maize did not significantly reduce wilt but increased ware tuber yield, while the effects of phaseolus beans were not significant. On the contrary, a one-season rotation in mildly infested field (about 15-20% infestation) resulted in a significant reduction in wilt incidence as compared to the control. The highest wilt incidence under rotation was below 13% as compared to 62% in the control. Finger millet and sweetpotatoes reduced wilt the most, while carrots and onions reduced the least. There were no significant yield differences among the rotation treatments except for the control. A two-season rotation on heavily infested soil reduced wilt to 22% - 49% as compared to 81% in the control. The highest wilt reduction was obtained with potato-beans-maize-potato treatment, while the lowest reduction was with potato-maize-maize-potato. Total yields and ware potatoes increased from 3.2 t ha-1 with the control monocrop to 9.3 - 11 t ha-1 with rotation and marketable yields increased from 1.8 t ha-1 to 6.7 - 9.2 t ha-1. Planting different crops in two consecutive seasons performed better than planting the same crop. Interestingly, sweetpotato, which is a major staple food in the area this experiment was conducted, was found to be a good rotation crop for reducing wilt. Beans, the most important food crop and a protein source, but probably a symptom less carrier of Ralstonia solanacearum can be a good rotation crop if used before or after cereals in a potato rotation scheme. Key Words: Crop rotation, infestations, marketable yield, Solanum tuberosum, ware potatoes, wilt incidence (African Crop Science Journal 2001 9(1): 257-266)

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat rotation in heavily infested fields did not significantly reduce potato wilt.

Treatment
wheate0
Outcome
wilte0
Direction
did not significantly reducee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A one-season rotation in heavily infested field (>90% wilt incidence) with wheat and maize did not significantly reduce wilt but increased ware tuber yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 654–809 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize rotation in heavily infested fields did not significantly reduce potato wilt.

Treatment
maizee0
Outcome
wilte0
Direction
did not significantly reducee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A one-season rotation in heavily infested field (>90% wilt incidence) with wheat and maize did not significantly reduce wilt but increased ware tuber yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 654–809 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat rotation increased potato ware tuber yield in heavily infested fields.

Treatment
wheate0
Outcome
ware tuber yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A one-season rotation in heavily infested field (>90% wilt incidence) with wheat and maize did not significantly reduce wilt but increased ware tuber yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 654–809 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize rotation increased potato ware tuber yield in heavily infested fields.

Treatment
maizee0
Outcome
ware tuber yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A one-season rotation in heavily infested field (>90% wilt incidence) with wheat and maize did not significantly reduce wilt but increased ware tuber yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 654–809 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Phaseolus bean rotation had no significant reported effect.

Treatment
phaseolus beanse0
Outcome
effectse0
Direction
not significante0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“while the effects of phaseolus beans were not significant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 811–869 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

One-season rotation in mildly infested fields significantly reduced potato wilt incidence compared with control.

Treatment
one-season rotatione0
Outcome
wilt incidencee0
Direction
reductione0
Qualifier
about 15-20% infestatione0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a one-season rotation in mildly infested field (about 15-20% infestation) resulted in a significant reduction in wilt incidence as compared to the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 887–1042 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest wilt incidence under rotation was below 13%, compared with 62% in control.

Treatment
rotatione0
Outcome
wilt incidencee0
Direction
belowe0
Value
below 13%e0
Qualifier
62%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest wilt incidence under rotation was below 13% as compared to 62% in the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1043–1133 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Finger millet and sweetpotato rotations reduced potato wilt most.

Treatment
Finger millet and sweetpotatoese0
Outcome
wilte0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Finger millet and sweetpotatoes reduced wilt the most, while carrots and onions reduced the least.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1134–1232 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carrot and onion rotations reduced potato wilt least.

Treatment
carrots and onionse0
Outcome
wilte0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Finger millet and sweetpotatoes reduced wilt the most, while carrots and onions reduced the least.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1134–1232 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield differences among rotation treatments were not significant, except versus control.

Treatment
rotation treatmentse0
Outcome
yield differencese0
Direction
no significante0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There were no significant yield differences among the rotation treatments except for the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1233–1330 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two-season rotation lowered potato wilt to 22%–49%, versus 81% under control.

Treatment
two-season rotatione0
Outcome
wilte0
Direction
reducede0
Value
22% - 49%e0
Qualifier
81%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A two-season rotation on heavily infested soil reduced wilt to 22% - 49% as compared to 81% in the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1331–1438 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potato-beans-maize-potato gave the greatest wilt reduction.

Treatment
potato-beans-maize-potatoe0
Outcome
wilt reductione0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
potato-maize-maize-potatoe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest wilt reduction was obtained with potato-beans-maize-potato treatment, while the lowest reduction was with potato-maize-maize-potato.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1439–1583 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potato-maize-maize-potato gave the lowest wilt reduction.

Treatment
potato-maize-maize-potatoe0
Outcome
wilt reductione0
Direction
loweste0
Comparator
potato-beans-maize-potatoe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest wilt reduction was obtained with potato-beans-maize-potato treatment, while the lowest reduction was with potato-maize-maize-potato.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1439–1583 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rotation increased total and ware potato yields from 3.2 to 9.3–11 t ha-1.

Taxon
potatoesSolanum tuberosume0
Treatment
rotatione0
Outcome
Total yields and ware potatoese0
Direction
increasede0
Value
9.3 - 11 t ha-1e0
Qualifier
3.2 t ha-1e0
Comparator
control monocrope0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Total yields and ware potatoes increased from 3.2 t ha-1 with the control monocrop to 9.3 - 11 t ha-1 with rotation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1584–1699 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rotation increased marketable potato yields from 1.8 to 6.7–9.2 t ha-1.

Outcome
marketable yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
6.7 - 9.2 t ha-1e0
Qualifier
1.8 t ha-1e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“marketable yields increased from 1.8 t ha-1 to 6.7 - 9.2 t ha-1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1704–1768 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Planting different crops in consecutive seasons performed better than repeating the same crop.

Treatment
Planting different crops in two consecutive seasonse0
Outcome
performed bettere0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
planting the same crope0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Planting different crops in two consecutive seasons performed better than planting the same crop.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1769–1866 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–66 · show in text ↑

Zea mays · disease · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect
See all 4 papers →

Triticum aestivum · disease · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Triticum aestivum · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Zea mays · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 14 positive, 6 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

Eleusine coracana · disease · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Daucus carota · disease · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

rotation · disease · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 8 positive, 9 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
    Wilt was most severe when potato followed fallow

    Effects of Green Manures on Verticillium Wilt of Potato · 1996 · compared with rape, Austrian winter pea, oat, and rye

    Opposite direction

  2. no effect
  3. negative

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

rotation · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

42 papers: 26 positive, 16 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

38 papers more in this group

See all 42 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.