Paper · 2001 · TSpace

The Effect of Crop Rotation on Bacterial Wilt Incidence and PotatoTuber Yield

20
claims
40
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

African Crop Science Journal, Vol. 9, No. 1, March 2001, pp. 257-266 The Effect of Crop Rotation on Bacterial Wilt Incidence and Potato Tuber Yield Berga Lemaga, R. Kanzikwera, R. Kakuhenzire, J. J. Hakiza and G. Maniz Code Number: cs01056 ABSTRACT: To determine the effects of crop rotation on potato bacterial wilt incidence and tuber yields, one-and two-season rotation experiments were conducted during 1995-1999 at Kachwekano Agricultural Research and Development Centre located at an altitude of 2200 meters in southwestern Uganda. Pulses, cereals, root crops and vegetables commonly grown in the area were included in different sets of rotation experiments. Each time, prior to planting the experiment, the field was planted to a bacterial wilt susceptible potato variety and artificial inoculation was also done, when needed, to achieve a somewhat uniform distribution of Ralstonia solanacearum. A one-season rotation in heavily infested field (>90% wilt incidence) with wheat and maize did not significantly reduce wilt but increased ware tuber yield, while the effects of phaseolus beans were not significant. On the contrary, a one-season rotation in mildly infested field (about 15-20% infestation) resulted in a significant reduction in wilt incidence as compared to the control. The highest wilt incidence under rotation was below 13% as compared to 62% in the control. Finger millet and sweetpotatoes reduced wilt the most, while carrots and onions reduced the least. There were no significant yield differences among the rotation treatments except for the control. A two-season rotation on heavily infested soil reduced wilt to 22% - 49% as compared to 81% in the control. The highest wilt reduction was obtained with potato-beans-maize-potato treatment, while the lowest reduction was with potato-maize-maize-potato. Total yields and ware potatoes increased from 3.2 t ha-1 with the control monocrop to 9.3 - 11 t ha-1 with rotation and marketable yields increased from 1.8 t ha-1 to 6.7 - 9.2 t ha-1. Planting different crops in two consecutive seasons performed better than planting the same crop. Interestingly, sweetpotato, which is a major staple food in the area this experiment was conducted, was found to be a good rotation crop for reducing wilt. Beans, the most important food crop and a protein source, but probably a symptom less carrier of Ralstonia solanacearum can be a good rotation crop if used before or after cereals in a potato rotation scheme. KEY WORDS: Crop rotation, infestations, marketable yield, Solanum tuberosum, ware potatoes, wilt incidence RÉSUM&Eacute: Pour déterminer des effets de rotation des cultures sur l'incidence de la bactériose et le rendement des tubercules, des essais d'une saison et de deux saisons ont été conduits en 1995-1999 au centre de développement et de recherche agricole de Kachwekamo, situé à une altitude 2200 m au Sud-Ouest de l'Uganda. Des légumineuses à gousses, des céréales, des plantes à racines et tubercules, et des légumes communément cultivées dans cette région ont été inclues dans des differentes séries d'essais de rotation. Chaque fois, avant l' établissement de l'essai, le champ était planté d'une variété de pomme de terre sensible à la bactériose et une inoculation artificielle était faite, une fois jugée nécessaire pour avoir une uniformité de la distribution de Ralstonia solanacerum. Une saison de rotation dans un champ fortememnt infesté (>90% d' incidence) avec le blé et le maïs n'a pas réduit significativement le mildiou mais a augmenté le rendement des tubercules, alors que les effets des haricots phaseolés n'ont pas été importants. Au contraire, une saison de rotation dans un champ moyennement infesté (environ 15-20% d'infestation) a conduit à une réduction significative de l'incidence du mildiou par rapport au témoin. L'incidence la plus élevée sous rotation était inferieur à 18% par rapport à 62% du témoin. L' eleusine et les patates douces ont réduit le plus le mildiou, alors que les carrotttes et les oignons ont réduit le moins le mildiou. Ils n'y avaient pas de differences significatives entre les traitements de rotation excepté le témoin. Une rotation de deux saisons sur un sol fortement infesté a réduit le mildiou de 22-49% par rapport à 81% pour le contrôle. La réduction la plus élevée du mildiou a été obtenue avec le traitement pomme de terre-haricots-maïs- pomme de terre, alors que la plus faible réduction a été obtenue avec la pomme de terre-maïs-maïs-pomme de terre. Les rendements en tubercules a augmenté de 3.2 t ha-1 chez le témoin monoculture à 9.3-11t ha-1 avec rotation et le rendement commercialisable a augmenté de 1.8 t ha-1 jusqu'a 6.7-9.2t ha-1. La plantation de differentes cultures dans deux saisons consécutives ont donné des meilleurs résultats plus que la plantation d'une même culture. La patate douce, qui est une des principales cultures vivrières de cette région où l'essai a été conduit a été trouvée être une culture de rotation diminuant la bactériose. Les haricots, principale culture vivrière et une source de protéines, mais probablement moins transporteur de Ralstonia solanacearum, peut être une culture de bonne rotation, si il est utilisé avant ou après les céréales dans un programme de rotation de la pomme de terre. Mots Clés: Rotation des cultures, infestation, rendememnt commercialisable, Solanum tuberosum, ware potatoes, incidence du mildiou Copyright 2001, African Crop Science Society

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In heavily infested fields, one-season wheat rotation did not significantly reduce potato wilt.

Treatment
wheate0
Outcome
wilte0
Direction
did not significantly reducee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A one-season rotation in heavily infested field (>90% wilt incidence) with wheat and maize did not significantly reduce wilt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 904–1028 · show in text ↑
e1

“potato bacterial wilt incidence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 295–326 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In heavily infested fields, one-season maize rotation did not significantly reduce potato wilt.

Treatment
maizee0
Outcome
wilte0
Direction
did not significantly reducee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A one-season rotation in heavily infested field (>90% wilt incidence) with wheat and maize did not significantly reduce wilt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 904–1028 · show in text ↑
e1

“potato bacterial wilt incidence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 295–326 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In heavily infested fields, one-season wheat rotation increased ware tuber yield.

Treatment
wheate0
Outcome
ware tuber yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A one-season rotation in heavily infested field (>90% wilt incidence) with wheat and maize did not significantly reduce wilt but increased ware tuber yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 904–1059 · show in text ↑
e1

“potato bacterial wilt incidence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 295–326 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In heavily infested fields, one-season maize rotation increased ware tuber yield.

Treatment
maizee0
Outcome
ware tuber yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A one-season rotation in heavily infested field (>90% wilt incidence) with wheat and maize did not significantly reduce wilt but increased ware tuber yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 904–1059 · show in text ↑
e1

“potato bacterial wilt incidence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 295–326 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

One-season phaseolus bean rotation had no significant reported effect.

Treatment
phaseolus beanse0
Outcome
effectse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the effects of phaseolus beans were not significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1067–1118 · show in text ↑
e1

“potato bacterial wilt incidence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 295–326 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In mildly infested fields, one-season rotation significantly reduced wilt incidence versus control.

Treatment
one-season rotatione0
Outcome
wilt incidencee0
Direction
reductione0
Qualifier
about 15-20% infestatione0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a one-season rotation in mildly infested field (about 15-20% infestation) resulted in a significant reduction in wilt incidence as compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1137–1291 · show in text ↑
e1

“potato bacterial wilt incidence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 295–326 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest wilt incidence under one-season rotation was below 13%, versus 62% in control.

Treatment
rotatione0
Outcome
wilt incidencee0
Direction
belowe0
Value
below 13%e0
Qualifier
62%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest wilt incidence under rotation was below 13% as compared to 62% in the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1293–1382 · show in text ↑
e1

“potato bacterial wilt incidence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 295–326 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Finger millet gave the greatest wilt reduction among one-season rotations.

Treatment
Finger millete0
Outcome
wilte0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Finger millet and sweetpotatoes reduced wilt the most”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1384–1437 · show in text ↑
e1

“potato bacterial wilt incidence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 295–326 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sweetpotatoes gave the greatest wilt reduction among one-season rotations.

Treatment
sweetpotatoese0
Outcome
wilte0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Finger millet and sweetpotatoes reduced wilt the most”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1384–1437 · show in text ↑
e1

“potato bacterial wilt incidence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 295–326 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carrots gave the least wilt reduction among one-season rotations.

Treatment
carrotse0
Outcome
wilte1
Direction
reduced the leaste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“carrots and onions reduced the least”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1445–1481 · show in text ↑
e1

“potato bacterial wilt incidence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 295–326 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Onions gave the least wilt reduction among one-season rotations.

Treatment
onionse0
Outcome
wilte1
Direction
reduced the leaste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“carrots and onions reduced the least”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1445–1481 · show in text ↑
e1

“potato bacterial wilt incidence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 295–326 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield did not differ significantly among one-season rotation treatments apart from control.

Outcome
yield differencese0
Direction
no significante0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There were no significant yield differences among the rotation treatments except for the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1483–1579 · show in text ↑
e1

“potato bacterial wilt incidence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 295–326 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two-season rotation in heavily infested soil reduced wilt to 22%–49% versus 81% in control.

Treatment
two-season rotatione0
Outcome
wilte0
Direction
reducede0
Value
22% - 49%e0
Qualifier
81%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A two-season rotation on heavily infested soil reduced wilt to 22% - 49% as compared to 81% in the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1581–1687 · show in text ↑
e1

“potato bacterial wilt incidence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 295–326 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potato-beans-maize-potato rotation had the highest wilt reduction.

Treatment
potato-beans-maize-potato treatmente0
Outcome
wilt reductione0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest wilt reduction was obtained with potato-beans-maize-potato treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1689–1769 · show in text ↑
e1

“potato bacterial wilt incidence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 295–326 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potato-maize-maize-potato rotation had the lowest wilt reduction.

Treatment
potato-maize-maize-potatoe0
Outcome
reductione0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the lowest reduction was with potato-maize-maize-potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1777–1832 · show in text ↑
e1

“potato bacterial wilt incidence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 295–326 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rotation increased total and ware potato yields to 9.3–11 t ha-1 from 3.2 t ha-1.

Treatment
rotatione0
Outcome
Total yields and ware potatoese0
Direction
increasede0
Value
9.3 - 11 t ha-1e0
Qualifier
3.2 t ha-1e0
Comparator
control monocrope0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Total yields and ware potatoes increased from 3.2 t ha-1 with the control monocrop to 9.3 - 11 t ha-1 with rotation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1834–1949 · show in text ↑
e1

“potato bacterial wilt incidence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 295–326 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rotation increased marketable potato yield to 6.7–9.2 t ha-1 from 1.8 t ha-1.

Treatment
rotatione1
Outcome
marketable yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
6.7 - 9.2 t ha-1e0
Qualifier
1.8 t ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“marketable yields increased from 1.8 t ha-1 to 6.7 - 9.2 t ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1954–2017 · show in text ↑
e1

“9.3 - 11 t ha-1 with rotation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1920–1949 · show in text ↑
e2

“potato bacterial wilt incidence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 295–326 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Different crops in successive seasons performed better than repeating one crop.

Treatment
different crops in two consecutive seasonse0
Outcome
performed bettere0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
same crope0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Planting different crops in two consecutive seasons performed better than planting the same crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2019–2115 · show in text ↑
e1

“potato bacterial wilt incidence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 295–326 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Sweetpotato was identified as a good rotation crop for reducing potato wilt.

Outcome
sweetpotatoe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sweetpotato, which is a major staple food in the area this experiment was conducted, was found to be a good rotation crop for reducing wilt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2132–2271 · show in text ↑
e1

“potato bacterial wilt incidence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 295–326 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Beans may be a good potato rotation crop before or after cereals.

Outcome
Beanse0
Qualifier
before or after cerealse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Beans, the most important food crop and a protein source, but probably a symptom less carrier of Ralstonia solanacearum can be a good rotation crop if used before or after cereals in a potato rotation scheme”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2273–2480 · show in text ↑

Zea mays · disease · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect
See all 4 papers →

Triticum aestivum · disease · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Triticum aestivum · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Zea mays · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 14 positive, 6 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

Eleusine coracana · disease · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Daucus carota · disease · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

rotation · disease · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 8 positive, 9 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
    Wilt was most severe when potato followed fallow

    Effects of Green Manures on Verticillium Wilt of Potato · 1996 · compared with rape, Austrian winter pea, oat, and rye

    Opposite direction

  2. no effect
  3. negative

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

rotation · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

42 papers: 26 positive, 16 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

38 papers more in this group

See all 42 papers →

8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.