Paper · 2008 · Chilean journal of agricultural research

Importance of Abscisic Acid (ABA) in the In Vitro Conservation of Cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz)

L. Pedro Barrueto Cid; Luiz L.C.B Carvalho

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
10
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

The conventional technology for in vitro plant conservation for cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) germplasm collections is laborious due to the need for several subculturing procedures per year. This practice implies high costs for medium preparation, tissue culture tubes, timeconsuming labor, risks of contamination, mislabeling of accession, and the need for large growth chambers. We have developed a new procedure using in vitro cultivated nodal axillary buds treated with different abscisic acid (ABA) concentrations to reduce the time for recycling transplants cultivated in a SP basic nutritive medium. Nodal explants were stored for three months with ABA. Plants were obtained after nodal axillary buds were placed in SP medium without ABA. Results indicated that 20 and 30 M ABA induced bud dormancy and delayed sprouting without affecting subsequent growth of plants after treatment.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

20 M ABA induced cassava bud dormancy.

Treatment
20e1
Outcome
bud dormancye1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 64–98 · show in text ↑
e1

“20 and 30 M ABA induced bud dormancy and delayed sprouting without affecting subsequent growth of plants after treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 774–895 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

20 M ABA delayed cassava bud sprouting.

Treatment
20e1
Outcome
sproutinge1
Direction
delayede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 64–98 · show in text ↑
e1

“20 and 30 M ABA induced bud dormancy and delayed sprouting without affecting subsequent growth of plants after treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 774–895 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

20 M ABA did not affect subsequent cassava plant growth.

Treatment
20e1
Outcome
subsequent growth of plantse1
Direction
without affectinge1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 64–98 · show in text ↑
e1

“20 and 30 M ABA induced bud dormancy and delayed sprouting without affecting subsequent growth of plants after treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 774–895 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

30 M ABA induced cassava bud dormancy.

Treatment
30 M ABAe1
Outcome
bud dormancye1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 64–98 · show in text ↑
e1

“20 and 30 M ABA induced bud dormancy and delayed sprouting without affecting subsequent growth of plants after treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 774–895 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

30 M ABA delayed cassava bud sprouting.

Treatment
30 M ABAe1
Outcome
sproutinge1
Direction
delayede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 64–98 · show in text ↑
e1

“20 and 30 M ABA induced bud dormancy and delayed sprouting without affecting subsequent growth of plants after treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 774–895 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

30 M ABA did not affect subsequent cassava plant growth.

Treatment
30 M ABAe1
Outcome
subsequent growth of plantse1
Direction
without affectinge1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 64–98 · show in text ↑
e1

“20 and 30 M ABA induced bud dormancy and delayed sprouting without affecting subsequent growth of plants after treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 774–895 · show in text ↑

(+)-abscisic acid · growth · Manihot esculenta (cassava)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 2 positive, 4 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.