Paper · 2003 · JSM Mycotoxins

Characterization and typing of aflatoxin-producing fungi in sugarcane fields of the southernmost Japan by cytochrome b gene analysis

Koji YOKOYAMA; Haruo TAKAHASHI; Li WANG; et al.

12
claims
24
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Distribution of Aspergillus flavus and A. parasiticus in sugarcane field soils, air and harvested sugarcane stems was studied in Okinawa Prefecture, the southernmost in Japan. Using a combination of dilution plate and plant debris plate techniques, the fungi were detected on all seven islands tested and in 74% of 53 soil samples. The fungi were also found on the cut surface of sugarcane stems from one of the islands. A. parasiticus was the predominant fungus although many atypical isolates of this fungus that produced metulated conidial heads were also detected. The aflatoxin producing strains were approximately 89% (146/164) of all the isolates and approximately 69% of A. flavus isolates. More than 40% of A, flavus isolates also produced G aflatoxin. SEM observation of conidial wall texture was useful for distinguishing A. parasiticus from A. flavus. Cyclopiazonic acid, an indole mycotoxin, was never synthesized by any of the A. parasiticus or G aflatoxin-producing A. flavus isolates tested. The digest this study is as follows: (1) A. parasiticus was isolated from sugarcane field soils, air and harvested sugarcane; (2) all strains of A. parasiticus isolated in these areas were different from type strain of A. parasiticus in terms of cytochrome b gene sequence and divided into 3 DNA types; and (3) the strains of afratoxin G-producing A. flavus were all A. nomius and divided into 2 DNA types. Molecular analysis of isolates showed that the strains isolated from sugarcane field soil, air and harvested sugarcane stems from the southernmost part of Japan are highly diverse and differ in terms of aflatoxin-producing ability.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aspergillus fungi were detected on all seven islands and in 74% of 53 soil samples.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Interactor
Aspergillus flavusAspergillus flavuse1pathogen
Outcome
fungi were detectede0
Value
74% of 53 soil samplese0
Setting
seven islandse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Aspergillus flavus
Aspergillus flavus · InteractorUS gov · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the fungi were detected on all seven islands tested and in 74% of 53 soil samples.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 249–331 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–76 · show in text ↑
e1

“Aspergillus flavus and A. parasiticus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 16–53 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aspergillus fungi were found on cut sugarcane stems from one island.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Organ / stage
stemse0
Outcome
fungi were also found on the cut surface of sugarcane stemse0
Setting
one of the islandse0

Verbatim

e0

“The fungi were also found on the cut surface of sugarcane stems from one of the islands.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 332–420 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A. parasiticus predominated among the detected fungi.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Interactor
A. parasiticusAspergillus parasiticuse0pathogen
Outcome
predominant funguse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Aspergillus parasiticus
Aspergillus parasiticus · InteractorMedmyco · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A. parasiticus was the predominant fungus although many atypical isolates of this fungus that produced metulated conidial heads were also detected.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 421–568 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–76 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Atypical A. parasiticus isolates with metulated conidial heads were detected.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Interactor
A. parasiticusAspergillus parasiticuse0pathogen
Outcome
atypical isolates of this fungus that produced metulated conidial heads were also detectede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Aspergillus parasiticus
Aspergillus parasiticus · InteractorMedmyco · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A. parasiticus was the predominant fungus although many atypical isolates of this fungus that produced metulated conidial heads were also detected.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 421–568 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–76 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

About 89% of all isolates produced aflatoxin.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Outcome
aflatoxin producing strainse0
Value
approximately 89% (146/164)e0

Verbatim

e0

“The aflatoxin producing strains were approximately 89% (146/164) of all the isolates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 569–653 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–76 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

About 69% of A. flavus isolates produced aflatoxin.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Interactor
A. flavusAspergillus flavuse0pathogen
Outcome
A. flavus isolatese0
Value
approximately 69%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Aspergillus flavus
Aspergillus flavus · InteractorUS gov · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“approximately 69% of A. flavus isolates.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 658–698 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–76 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

More than 40% of A. flavus isolates produced G aflatoxin.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Interactor
A, flavuse0pathogen
Outcome
produced G aflatoxine0
Value
More than 40%e0

Verbatim

e0

“More than 40% of A, flavus isolates also produced G aflatoxin.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 699–761 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–76 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conidial wall texture by SEM distinguished A. parasiticus from A. flavus.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Interactor
A. parasiticusAspergillus parasiticuse0pathogen
Outcome
useful for distinguishing A. parasiticus from A. flavuse0
Comparator
A. flavuse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Aspergillus parasiticus
Aspergillus parasiticus · InteractorMedmyco · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SEM observation of conidial wall texture was useful for distinguishing A. parasiticus from A. flavus.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 762–863 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–76 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No tested A. parasiticus isolates synthesized cyclopiazonic acid.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Interactor
A. parasiticusAspergillus parasiticuse0pathogen
Outcome
Cyclopiazonic acid, an indole mycotoxin, was never synthesizede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Aspergillus parasiticus
Aspergillus parasiticus · InteractorMedmyco · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cyclopiazonic acid, an indole mycotoxin, was never synthesized by any of the A. parasiticus or G aflatoxin-producing A. flavus isolates tested.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 864–1007 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–76 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No tested G aflatoxin-producing A. flavus isolates synthesized cyclopiazonic acid.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Interactor
A. flavusAspergillus flavuse0pathogen
Outcome
Cyclopiazonic acid, an indole mycotoxin, was never synthesizede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Aspergillus flavus
Aspergillus flavus · InteractorUS gov · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cyclopiazonic acid, an indole mycotoxin, was never synthesized by any of the A. parasiticus or G aflatoxin-producing A. flavus isolates tested.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 864–1007 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–76 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A. parasiticus from these areas differed from its type strain and formed three DNA types.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Interactor
A. parasiticusAspergillus parasiticuse0pathogen
Outcome
different from type strain of A. parasiticus in terms of cytochrome b gene sequence and divided into 3 DNA typese0
Value
3 DNA typese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Aspergillus parasiticus
Aspergillus parasiticus · InteractorMedmyco · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“all strains of A. parasiticus isolated in these areas were different from type strain of A. parasiticus in terms of cytochrome b gene sequence and divided into 3 DNA types”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1138–1309 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–76 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The G aflatoxin-producing A. flavus strains were A. nomius and formed two DNA types.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Interactor
A. nomiuse0pathogen
Outcome
were all A. nomius and divided into 2 DNA typese0
Value
2 DNA typese0

Verbatim

e0

“the strains of afratoxin G-producing A. flavus were all A. nomius and divided into 2 DNA types.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1319–1414 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–76 · show in text ↑