Paper · 1991 · Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture

Conservation cropping systems for the semi-arid tropics of North Queensland, Australia

AL Cogle; RJ Bateman; DH Heiner

4
claims
9
verbatim quotes
10
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A farming systems project was commenced in the semi-arid tropics of north-eastern Australia to assess the cropping potential and reliability of a newly developing region. Emphasis was placed on evaluation of conservation cropping systems, since it was expected that these would be the most successful and protective uses of the land. This paper discusses the agronomy of peanuts, maize and sorghum grown under different conservative cropping practices (reduced tillage, no tillage, ley) on the soil (red earth) most likely to be developed for large-scale cropping in the region. Crop yields with all practices were limited by establishment difficulties including high soil temperatures, poor weed control and climatic variability. Reduced tillage was more successful than no tillage due to higher yields in dry years; however, in wet years no tillage produced similar yields. The ley cropping system may have some advantages in this environment for integrated production and resource protection.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Crop yields with all conservation cropping practices were limited by establishment difficulties, including high soil temperatures and poor weed control.

Taxon
peanuts, maize and sorghumArachis hypogaeaSorghumZea mayse0
Treatment
conservative cropping practicese0
Outcome
Crop yieldse1
Qualifier
limited by establishment difficulties including high soil temperatures, poor weed control and climatic variabilitye1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This paper discusses the agronomy of peanuts, maize and sorghum grown under different conservative cropping practices (reduced tillage, no tillage, ley)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 334–486 · show in text ↑
e1

“Crop yields with all practices were limited by establishment difficulties including high soil temperatures, poor weed control and climatic variability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 579–729 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced tillage gave higher yields than no tillage in dry years.

Taxon
peanuts, maize and sorghumArachis hypogaeaSorghumZea mayse0
Treatment
Reduced tillagee2
Outcome
yieldse2
Direction
highere2
Qualifier
in dry yearse2
Comparator
no tillagee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This paper discusses the agronomy of peanuts, maize and sorghum grown under different conservative cropping practices (reduced tillage, no tillage, ley)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 334–486 · show in text ↑
e2

“Reduced tillage was more successful than no tillage due to higher yields in dry years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 731–816 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In wet years no tillage gave yields similar to reduced tillage.

Taxon
peanuts, maize and sorghumArachis hypogaeaSorghumZea mayse0
Treatment
no tillagee3
Outcome
yieldse3
Direction
similare3
Qualifier
in wet yearse3
Comparator
Reduced tillagee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This paper discusses the agronomy of peanuts, maize and sorghum grown under different conservative cropping practices (reduced tillage, no tillage, ley)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 334–486 · show in text ↑
e2

“Reduced tillage was more successful than no tillage due to higher yields in dry years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 731–816 · show in text ↑
e3

“in wet years no tillage produced similar yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 827–874 · show in text ↑
Recommendationhypothesisoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The ley cropping system may have advantages for integrated production and resource protection in this environment.

Taxon
peanuts, maize and sorghumArachis hypogaeaSorghumZea mayse0
Treatment
ley cropping systeme4
Outcome
integrated production and resource protectione4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This paper discusses the agronomy of peanuts, maize and sorghum grown under different conservative cropping practices (reduced tillage, no tillage, ley)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 334–486 · show in text ↑
e4

“The ley cropping system may have some advantages in this environment for integrated production and resource protection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 876–994 · show in text ↑

tillage · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results differ

90 papers: 66 positive, 24 negative or no effect

65 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

86 papers more in this group

See all 90 papers →

tillage · yield · SorghumResults differ

123 papers: 102 positive, 21 negative or no effect

101 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

119 papers more in this group

See all 123 papers →

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

811 papers in the same direction as this paper · 230 in the opposite direction · 57 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

1,095 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.