Paper · 2014 · Russian Journal of Genetics Applied Research

Japanese Iris (Iris ensata Thunb.) in southern West Siberia

Z. V. Dolganova

18
claims
36
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Japanese varieties of Iris ensata Thunb. were imported to Russia for more than 100 years ago by several scientists (E. Regel, N.I. Vavilov, V.M. Nosilov, V.T. Palvelyev), and in the 1980s these varieties were tested in the Central Botanical Garden of the Russian Academy of Sciences (RAS) and in most cases, they failed (Rodionenko, 2002; Mironova, 2008). The first varieties were developed by G.I. Rodionenko. Japanese varieties were successfully introduced under forest-steppe conditions of the Altai Krai at the Lisavenko RI of Horticulture for Siberia (RIHS), and then breeding was conducted with the participation of retro varieties developed in 1980–1982. The crossing of geographically distant varieties, first, French, and Japanese, and then, Altai, Far Eastern, Leningrad, and American, brought about 150 adapted ornamental genotypes and 15 I. ensata varieties. In the progeny of varieties with simple flowers, genotypes with double and half-double flowers were selected, and in the progeny of the last ones, a fertile genotype with 12 perianth segments. The pollen quality of the selected I. ensata genotypes was nearly as good as in the Altai species I. ruthenica and I. glaucenscens: pollen fertility was 78%, and viability, 53%. The fruit formation of cultivars with simple flowers was 54%, with double, 9%, and with forced crossing 93 and 73%, respectively. The fruit contained 5-116 seeds; their weight was 6–9 g; and germinative capacity 1–57%. Seedlings of 3–20% of plants from a group came to flowering in 3–5 years. Eight donors with high productivity, new colour, and flower shape were selected. During breeding, flower diameter increased from 12 to 20 cm; the width of the upper perianth segments, from 2 to 8 cm; and the width of the lower perianth segments, from 7 to 9 cm. The range of flower coloring extended to 11 groups.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 18

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Crosses of geographically distant varieties produced 150 adapted ornamental genotypes.

Taxon
Iris ensata Thunb.Iris ensatat0
Outcome
adapted ornamental genotypese0
Value
150e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Iris ensata
Iris ensata · TaxonDr. Alexey Yakovlev · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The crossing of geographically distant varieties, first, French, and Japanese, and then, Altai, Far Eastern, Leningrad, and American, brought about 150 adapted ornamental genotypes and 15 I. ensata varieties.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 662–870 · show in text ↑
t0

“Iris ensata Thunb.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–33 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Crosses of geographically distant varieties produced 15 I. ensata varieties.

Taxon
Iris ensata Thunb.Iris ensatat0
Outcome
I. ensata varietiese0
Value
15e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Iris ensata
Iris ensata · TaxonDr. Alexey Yakovlev · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The crossing of geographically distant varieties, first, French, and Japanese, and then, Altai, Far Eastern, Leningrad, and American, brought about 150 adapted ornamental genotypes and 15 I. ensata varieties.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 662–870 · show in text ↑
t0

“Iris ensata Thunb.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–33 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Progeny of simple-flowered varieties yielded selected double- and half-double-flowered genotypes.

Taxon
Iris ensata Thunb.Iris ensatat0
Material
varieties with simple flowerse0
Outcome
genotypes with double and half-double flowerse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Iris ensata
Iris ensata · TaxonDr. Alexey Yakovlev · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the progeny of varieties with simple flowers, genotypes with double and half-double flowers were selected, and in the progeny of the last ones, a fertile genotype with 12 perianth segments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 871–1063 · show in text ↑
t0

“Iris ensata Thunb.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–33 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Progeny of double- and half-double forms yielded a fertile genotype with 12 perianth segments.

Taxon
Iris ensata Thunb.Iris ensatat0
Outcome
a fertile genotype with 12 perianth segmentse0
Value
12 perianth segmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Iris ensata
Iris ensata · TaxonDr. Alexey Yakovlev · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the progeny of varieties with simple flowers, genotypes with double and half-double flowers were selected, and in the progeny of the last ones, a fertile genotype with 12 perianth segments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 871–1063 · show in text ↑
t0

“Iris ensata Thunb.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–33 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pollen fertility of selected genotypes was 78%, nearly as good as Altai species.

Taxon
Iris ensata Thunb.Iris ensatat0
Outcome
pollen fertilitye0
Value
78%e0
Comparator
I. ruthenica and I. glaucenscense0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Iris ensata
Iris ensata · TaxonDr. Alexey Yakovlev · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The pollen quality of the selected I. ensata genotypes was nearly as good as in the Altai species I. ruthenica and I. glaucenscens: pollen fertility was 78%, and viability, 53%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1064–1241 · show in text ↑
t0

“Iris ensata Thunb.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–33 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pollen viability of selected genotypes was 53%.

Taxon
Iris ensata Thunb.Iris ensatat0
Outcome
viabilitye0
Value
53%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Iris ensata
Iris ensata · TaxonDr. Alexey Yakovlev · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The pollen quality of the selected I. ensata genotypes was nearly as good as in the Altai species I. ruthenica and I. glaucenscens: pollen fertility was 78%, and viability, 53%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1064–1241 · show in text ↑
t0

“Iris ensata Thunb.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–33 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Simple-flowered cultivars had 54% fruit formation.

Taxon
Iris ensata Thunb.Iris ensatat0
Material
cultivars with simple flowerse0
Outcome
fruit formatione0
Value
54%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Iris ensata
Iris ensata · TaxonDr. Alexey Yakovlev · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The fruit formation of cultivars with simple flowers was 54%, with double, 9%, and with forced crossing 93 and 73%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1242–1371 · show in text ↑
t0

“Iris ensata Thunb.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–33 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Double-flowered cultivars had 9% fruit formation.

Taxon
Iris ensata Thunb.Iris ensatat0
Material
doublee0
Outcome
fruit formatione0
Value
9%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Iris ensata
Iris ensata · TaxonDr. Alexey Yakovlev · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The fruit formation of cultivars with simple flowers was 54%, with double, 9%, and with forced crossing 93 and 73%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1242–1371 · show in text ↑
t0

“Iris ensata Thunb.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–33 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Forced crossing yielded fruit formation of 93 and 73%, respectively.

Taxon
Iris ensata Thunb.Iris ensatat0
Treatment
forced crossinge0
Outcome
fruit formatione0
Value
93 and 73%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Iris ensata
Iris ensata · TaxonDr. Alexey Yakovlev · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The fruit formation of cultivars with simple flowers was 54%, with double, 9%, and with forced crossing 93 and 73%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1242–1371 · show in text ↑
t0

“Iris ensata Thunb.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–33 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit seeds was 5-116 seeds.

Taxon
Iris ensata Thunb.Iris ensatat0
Outcome
seedse0
Value
5-116 seedse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Iris ensata
Iris ensata · TaxonDr. Alexey Yakovlev · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The fruit contained 5-116 seeds; their weight was 6–9 g; and germinative capacity 1–57%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1372–1460 · show in text ↑
t0

“Iris ensata Thunb.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–33 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit weight was 6–9 g.

Taxon
Iris ensata Thunb.Iris ensatat0
Outcome
weighte0
Value
6–9 ge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Iris ensata
Iris ensata · TaxonDr. Alexey Yakovlev · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The fruit contained 5-116 seeds; their weight was 6–9 g; and germinative capacity 1–57%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1372–1460 · show in text ↑
t0

“Iris ensata Thunb.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–33 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit germinative capacity was 1–57%.

Taxon
Iris ensata Thunb.Iris ensatat0
Outcome
germinative capacitye0
Value
1–57%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Iris ensata
Iris ensata · TaxonDr. Alexey Yakovlev · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The fruit contained 5-116 seeds; their weight was 6–9 g; and germinative capacity 1–57%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1372–1460 · show in text ↑
t0

“Iris ensata Thunb.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–33 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

3–20% of seedlings flowered in 3–5 years.

Taxon
Iris ensata Thunb.Iris ensatat0
Outcome
came to floweringe0
Value
3–20%e0
Qualifier
3–5 yearse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Iris ensata
Iris ensata · TaxonDr. Alexey Yakovlev · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seedlings of 3–20% of plants from a group came to flowering in 3–5 years.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1461–1534 · show in text ↑
t0

“Iris ensata Thunb.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–33 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Eight donors with high productivity, new colour and flower shape were selected.

Taxon
Iris ensata Thunb.Iris ensatat0
Outcome
donors with high productivity, new colour, and flower shapee0
Value
Eighte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Iris ensata
Iris ensata · TaxonDr. Alexey Yakovlev · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Eight donors with high productivity, new colour, and flower shape were selected.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1535–1615 · show in text ↑
t0

“Iris ensata Thunb.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–33 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

flower diameter increased from 12 to 20 cm during breeding.

Taxon
Iris ensata Thunb.Iris ensatat0
Outcome
flower diametere0
Direction
increasede0
Value
12 to 20 cme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Iris ensata
Iris ensata · TaxonDr. Alexey Yakovlev · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“During breeding, flower diameter increased from 12 to 20 cm; the width of the upper perianth segments, from 2 to 8 cm; and the width of the lower perianth segments, from 7 to 9 cm.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1616–1796 · show in text ↑
t0

“Iris ensata Thunb.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–33 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

width of the upper perianth segments increased from 2 to 8 cm during breeding.

Taxon
Iris ensata Thunb.Iris ensatat0
Outcome
width of the upper perianth segmentse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
2 to 8 cme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Iris ensata
Iris ensata · TaxonDr. Alexey Yakovlev · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“During breeding, flower diameter increased from 12 to 20 cm; the width of the upper perianth segments, from 2 to 8 cm; and the width of the lower perianth segments, from 7 to 9 cm.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1616–1796 · show in text ↑
t0

“Iris ensata Thunb.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–33 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

width of the lower perianth segments increased from 7 to 9 cm during breeding.

Taxon
Iris ensata Thunb.Iris ensatat0
Outcome
width of the lower perianth segmentse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
7 to 9 cme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Iris ensata
Iris ensata · TaxonDr. Alexey Yakovlev · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“During breeding, flower diameter increased from 12 to 20 cm; the width of the upper perianth segments, from 2 to 8 cm; and the width of the lower perianth segments, from 7 to 9 cm.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1616–1796 · show in text ↑
t0

“Iris ensata Thunb.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–33 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The range of flower coloring extended to 11 groups.

Taxon
Iris ensata Thunb.Iris ensatat0
Outcome
range of flower coloringe0
Direction
extendede0
Value
11 groupse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Iris ensata
Iris ensata · TaxonDr. Alexey Yakovlev · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The range of flower coloring extended to 11 groups.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1797–1848 · show in text ↑
t0

“Iris ensata Thunb.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–33 · show in text ↑