Paper · 2001 · Crop Science

Grain Yield and Yield Components of Doublecropped Winter Wheat as Affected by Wheat and Previous Soybean Production Practices

James R. Frederick; Philip J. Bauer; Warren J. Busscher

7
claims
13
verbatim quotes
13
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Development and grain yield of doublecropped winter wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) are influenced by the production practices used to produce the wheat crop and potentially by those used to produce the previous crop. This 2‐yr field study was conducted on a Goldsboro loamy sand (fine‐loamy, siliceous, thermic Aquic Kandiudult) to determine whether production practices used in the spring to produce the previous soybean [ Glycine max (L.) Merr.] crop affect wheat grain yield and yield component responses to fall production practices. Treatments were deep tillage the previous spring prior to planting soybean using row widths of 19 or 76 cm, deep tillage in the fall prior to wheat planting, deep tillage in both the spring and fall, and no deep tillage for wheat planted with and without surface tillage. Fall deep tillage was the only treatment that consistently increased grain yield and all of the yield components; increasing grain yield, fertile head number per square meter, kernel number per head, and individual kernel weight by an average of 27, 11, 10, and 3%, respectively, over all other treatments. Grain yield and kernel number per square meter responses to fall deep tillage were greatest with no spring deep tillage, with no surface tillage, or when the previous soybean was grown using 76‐cm‐row widths. Grain yield, fertile head number per square meter, and kernel weight were all higher without surface tillage than with surface tillage. Results from this study show that production practices used to produce the previous soybean crop, such as row width and spring deep tillage, can have a significant effect on the grain yield and yield component responses of wheat to fall production practices.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fall deep tillage raised wheat grain yield by 27% on average over other treatments.

Treatment
Fall deep tillagee0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasinge0
Value
27e0
Comparator
all other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fall deep tillage was the only treatment that consistently increased grain yield and all of the yield components; increasing grain yield, fertile head number per square meter, kernel number per head, and individual kernel weight by an average of 27, 11, 10, and 3%, respectively, over all other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 809–1114 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fall deep tillage raised fertile head number per square meter by 11%.

Treatment
Fall deep tillagee0
Outcome
fertile head number per square metere0
Direction
increasinge0
Value
11e0
Comparator
all other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fall deep tillage was the only treatment that consistently increased grain yield and all of the yield components; increasing grain yield, fertile head number per square meter, kernel number per head, and individual kernel weight by an average of 27, 11, 10, and 3%, respectively, over all other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 809–1114 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fall deep tillage raised kernels per head by 10%.

Treatment
Fall deep tillagee0
Outcome
kernel number per heade0
Direction
increasinge0
Value
10e0
Comparator
all other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fall deep tillage was the only treatment that consistently increased grain yield and all of the yield components; increasing grain yield, fertile head number per square meter, kernel number per head, and individual kernel weight by an average of 27, 11, 10, and 3%, respectively, over all other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 809–1114 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fall deep tillage raised individual kernel weight by 3%.

Treatment
Fall deep tillagee0
Outcome
individual kernel weighte0
Direction
increasinge0
Value
3%e0
Comparator
all other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fall deep tillage was the only treatment that consistently increased grain yield and all of the yield components; increasing grain yield, fertile head number per square meter, kernel number per head, and individual kernel weight by an average of 27, 11, 10, and 3%, respectively, over all other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 809–1114 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–62 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield and kernel number responses to fall deep tillage were greatest without spring deep tillage or surface tillage, or after soybean grown in 76 cm rows.

Treatment
fall deep tillagee0
Outcome
Grain yield and kernel number per square meter responsese0
Direction
greateste0
Qualifier
no spring deep tillage, with no surface tillage, or when the previous soybean was grown using 76‐cm‐row widthse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yield and kernel number per square meter responses to fall deep tillage were greatest with no spring deep tillage, with no surface tillage, or when the previous soybean was grown using 76‐cm‐row widths”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1116–1323 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Without surface tillage, grain yield, fertile head number and kernel weight were higher.

Treatment
without surface tillagee0
Outcome
Grain yield, fertile head number per square meter, and kernel weighte0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
with surface tillagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yield, fertile head number per square meter, and kernel weight were all higher without surface tillage than with surface tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1325–1459 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–62 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Previous soybean row width and spring deep tillage significantly affected wheat responses to fall practices.

Treatment
row width and spring deep tillagee0
Outcome
grain yield and yield component responsese0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“production practices used to produce the previous soybean crop, such as row width and spring deep tillage, can have a significant effect on the grain yield and yield component responses of wheat to fall production practices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1495–1718 · show in text ↑

tillage · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

1,414 papers: 1,116 positive, 298 negative or no effect

1,115 papers in the same direction as this paper · 257 in the opposite direction · 41 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

1,410 papers more in this group

See all 1,414 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.