Paper · 1988 · Australian Journal of Agricultural Research

Inoculum density of Cochliobolus sativus in soil and common root rot of wheat cultivars in Queensland

RD Tinline; GB Wildermuth; DT Spurr

9
claims
21
verbatim quotes
27
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Common root rot was assessed in wheat cultivars grown at field sites in Queensland having low, intermediate and high inoculum densities of Cochliobolus sativus. The densities at seeding time in the upper 10 cm of the profile, were 3, 77 and 132 viable propagules per g soil respectively. Both incidence and intensity of disease at tillering, flowering and firm dough stages of plant development appeared closely related to inoculum density. Additional inoculum applied with seed increased disease markedly at the low inoculum density site and slightly at the intermediate site, and had no effect at the high inoculum density site, indicating a threshold level for maximum disease in the test. Reduction in dry weight of plants at the low and high sites paralleled the disease levels at the tillering and flowering stages. The relative reactions of the cultivars were expressed consistently: Songlen and Timgalen invariably were more diseased than Kite and QT2338/9. The results suggest that cultivars may be evaluated for resistance in the field from tillering onward if disease levels are adequate. C. sativus was the dominant fungus isolated from the subcrown internodes of plants from non-inoculated subplots. Its frequency of isolation was much less from the low inoculum density site than the intermediate and high inoculum density sites, and lower from Kite and QT2338/9 than from Songlen and Timgalen. Fursariurn chlamydosporum was isolated from subcrown internodes with increasing frequency as the season progressed. However, it was considered to be a secondary invader of the plant material.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Incidence and intensity of common root rot appeared closely related to soil inoculum density of Cochliobolus sativus.

Treatment
inoculum densitye1
Interactor
Cochliobolus sativusBipolaris sorokinianat0pathogen
Outcome
incidence and intensity of diseasee1
Setting
field sites in Queenslande3

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bipolaris sorokiniana
Bipolaris sorokiniana · InteractorJie-Hao Ou · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Inoculum density of Cochliobolus sativus in soil and common root rot of wheat cultivars in Queensland”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–101 · show in text ↑
e1

“Both incidence and intensity of disease at tillering, flowering and firm dough stages of plant development appeared closely related to inoculum density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 288–439 · show in text ↑
e3

“Common root rot was assessed in wheat cultivars grown at field sites in Queensland”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Additional seed-applied inoculum markedly increased disease at the low inoculum density site.

Treatment
Additional inoculum applied with seede2
Interactor
Cochliobolus sativusBipolaris sorokinianat0pathogen
Outcome
diseasee2
Direction
increasede2
Qualifier
markedlye2
Setting
low inoculum density sitee2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bipolaris sorokiniana
Bipolaris sorokiniana · InteractorJie-Hao Ou · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Inoculum density of Cochliobolus sativus in soil and common root rot of wheat cultivars in Queensland”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–101 · show in text ↑
e2

“Additional inoculum applied with seed increased disease markedly at the low inoculum density site and slightly at the intermediate site, and had no effect at the high inoculum density site, indicating a threshold level for maximum disease in the test”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 441–691 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed-applied inoculum had no effect on disease at the high inoculum density site, indicating a threshold for maximum disease.

Treatment
Additional inoculum applied with seede2
Interactor
Cochliobolus sativusBipolaris sorokinianat0pathogen
Outcome
diseasee2
Direction
no effecte2
Qualifier
threshold level for maximum diseasee2
Setting
high inoculum density sitee2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bipolaris sorokiniana
Bipolaris sorokiniana · InteractorJie-Hao Ou · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Inoculum density of Cochliobolus sativus in soil and common root rot of wheat cultivars in Queensland”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–101 · show in text ↑
e2

“Additional inoculum applied with seed increased disease markedly at the low inoculum density site and slightly at the intermediate site, and had no effect at the high inoculum density site, indicating a threshold level for maximum disease in the test”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 441–691 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduction in dry weight of wheat plants at the low and high sites paralleled the disease levels at tillering and flowering.

Outcome
dry weight of plantse4
Direction
Reductione4
Setting
low and high sitese4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Inoculum density of Cochliobolus sativus in soil and common root rot of wheat cultivars in Queensland”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–101 · show in text ↑
e4

“Reduction in dry weight of plants at the low and high sites paralleled the disease levels at the tillering and flowering stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 693–820 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Songlen and Timgalen were more diseased than Kite and QT2338/9.

Material
Songlen and Timgalene5
Outcome
diseasee5
Direction
more diseasede5
Comparator
Kite and QT2338/9e5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Inoculum density of Cochliobolus sativus in soil and common root rot of wheat cultivars in Queensland”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–101 · show in text ↑
e5

“Songlen and Timgalen invariably were more diseased than Kite and QT2338/9”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 891–964 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivars may be evaluated for field resistance from tillering onward if disease levels are adequate.

Outcome
evaluated for resistance in the fielde6
Qualifier
if disease levels are adequatee6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Inoculum density of Cochliobolus sativus in soil and common root rot of wheat cultivars in Queensland”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–101 · show in text ↑
e6

“The results suggest that cultivars may be evaluated for resistance in the field from tillering onward if disease levels are adequate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 966–1098 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cochliobolus sativus was the dominant fungus isolated from subcrown internodes of plants in non-inoculated subplots.

Organ / stage
subcrown internodese7
Interactor
C. sativusBipolaris sorokinianae7pathogen
Outcome
dominant fungus isolated from the subcrown internodese7
Setting
non-inoculated subplotse7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bipolaris sorokiniana
Bipolaris sorokiniana · InteractorJie-Hao Ou · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Inoculum density of Cochliobolus sativus in soil and common root rot of wheat cultivars in Queensland”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–101 · show in text ↑
e7

“C. sativus was the dominant fungus isolated from the subcrown internodes of plants from non-inoculated subplots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1100–1211 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Isolation frequency of Cochliobolus sativus was much lower at the low inoculum density site than at the intermediate and high sites.

Interactor
C. sativusBipolaris sorokinianae7pathogen
Outcome
frequency of isolatione2
Direction
much lesse2
Comparator
intermediate and high inoculum density sitese2
Setting
low inoculum density sitee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bipolaris sorokiniana
Bipolaris sorokiniana · InteractorJie-Hao Ou · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Inoculum density of Cochliobolus sativus in soil and common root rot of wheat cultivars in Queensland”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–101 · show in text ↑
e7

“C. sativus was the dominant fungus isolated from the subcrown internodes of plants from non-inoculated subplots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1100–1211 · show in text ↑
e2

“Its frequency of isolation was much less from the low inoculum density site than the intermediate and high inoculum density sites”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1213–1342 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fursariurn chlamydosporum was isolated from subcrown internodes with increasing frequency as the season progressed.

Organ / stage
subcrown internodese1
Interactor
Fursariurn chlamydosporume1other
Outcome
isolated from subcrown internodese1
Direction
increasing frequencye1
Qualifier
secondary invadere2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Inoculum density of Cochliobolus sativus in soil and common root rot of wheat cultivars in Queensland”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–101 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fursariurn chlamydosporum was isolated from subcrown internodes with increasing frequency as the season progressed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1409–1523 · show in text ↑
e2

“it was considered to be a secondary invader of the plant material”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1534–1599 · show in text ↑

inoculation · Bipolaris sorokiniana · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 10 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.